Bloggfrslur mnaarins, oktber 2016

Hugur og hnd, skapa allt samflagi, og alla neysluna. egar vi segjum, a eru engir peningar til, er a eins og a segja, a a s ekkert bkhald til.

Sett blogg: Bjarni Jnsson

Fjrmlakerfi til flksins

segir, sem er rtt.

Grundvallaratrii velferarkerfisins, .e. aukinnar velferar, er framleiniaukning atvinnuveganna.

g segi, sem er rtt.

Hugur og hnd, skapa allt samflagi, og alla neysluna.

egar vi segjum, a eru engir peningar til, er a eins og a segja, a a s ekkert bkhald til.

Bkhald framleiir ekkert.

Vi notum bkhaldi, til a hafa yfirsn yfir framleisluna og ll viskipti jflaginu.

000

vibt

Ekki segja, a vantar bkhald, peninga fyrir innviunum jflaginu.

Betra er a segja, a a vanti mannskap, ea tlendan gjaldeyrir til a hgt s a vinna verkefni.

gti komi til greina a f til dmis Plverja verkefni.

Ef a vantar gjaldeyrir, er a vera duglegri a afla gjaldeyris, a er bkhalds inneign hj rum jum.

Einnig kemur til greina a lkka gengi slensku krnunnar, slenska bkhaldsins, til a innlend eysla dragist saman.

Laun og msar greislur, vera a samsvara tekjum, urfum vi ekki a lkka gengi, bkhaldinu.

Auvita lkkum vi fyrst svindl bnusa og yfir launin, og allt s upp borinu.

Lrum a svindla ekki, allir.

Stundum er hnupl rtta, sjkdmur.

Hjlpum hver rum.

000

Vi eru ekki bnir a gleyma v a fjrmlakerfi setti allt hausinn,

til a geta n eignunum af flki og fyrirtkjum.*

etta stendur allt blogginu mnu.

Lra nstareyndirnar, og koma me lausnirnar gegn um skpunina.

Vi erum raunsir, en um lei leitandi a njum lausnum, skapandi.

egar g segi etta.

arna tti a vera sl vi hverja setningu til a skra mli, en g set aeins eina.

Egilsstair, 30.10.2016 Jnas Gunnlaugsson

hr koma tvr slir

*etta er gamla sagan, g lna r pening, og hiri peninginn af r. hef g a sem g lnai r og skuldar a lka. Og a besta, g lnai r ekki neitt. Er r, a hreinsa gljuna r augunum, og sktinn r eyrunum?

000

Verum fulltrar gngta, lausna.


Sm hugleiing um Reykjavkurflugvll, eldgos, jarskjlfta og, jarsig, hkkun sjvarbors og sjvarfl. g myndi byrja v a f allskonar elisfringa, jarelisfringa, jarfringa, eldfjallafringa til a huga mli.

Lestarkerfi ea niurgreidd flug?

Mbl.is

000

essari samgngu umru, langar mig a endurtaka, a nausynlegt er a hafa tvo flugvelli suvesturlandi vegna eldgosa httu slandi.

g er a reyna a stta ig vi, a g lti eyileggja Reykjavkur flugvll. g vil a , egar hefur tapa 50 miljara flugvelli, borgiru aftur 50 miljara fyrir jrnbrautarlest til Keflavkur.

28.3.2016 | 08:14

Sm hugleiing um Reykjavkurflugvll, eldgos, jarskjlfta og, jarsig, hkkun sjvarbors og sjvarfl.

Jnas Gunnlaugsson | 16. desember 2015

Egilsstair, 27.10.2016 Jnas Gunnlaugsson


mbl.is Lestarkerfi ea niurgreitt flug?
Tilkynna um vieigandi tengingu vi frtt

str hluti af skpuum peningum, bkhaldi, a fara heilbrigiskerfi, sklakerfi, vegakerfi og alla innvii jflagana, samt atvinnuuppbyggingu, og arf litla ea enga skatta?

Til a f vitrna umru um fjrmlin, arf a byrja v a skilja hva fjrml eru.

Fjrml eru bkhald.

Peningar eru bkhald.

000

Sett blogg: Bjarni Jnsson

Fjrmlakerfi til flksins

000

Og spyrjum vi, hvernig hgum vi bkhaldinu.

str hluti af skpuum peningum, bkhaldi, a fara Heilbrigiskerfi, sklakerfi, vegakerfi og alla innvii jflagana?

rennur peningaskpunarbkhaldi, gegn um essa aila, innviina, og til flksins fyrir a vihalda rekstri jflagsins, og byggja innvii jflagsins upp.

sama mta verur skpunarbkhaldi fyrir atvinnuuppbygginguna, og etta kemur sta skatta.

Allt kemur fr flkinu, vinnan, hugsunin, skpunin, svo a etta er rkrtt.

talar um banka einkaeigu, og samflagsbanka.

Hver segir a einhver megi ekki reka banka, en a hann eigi skrifaa tlu bankabkhaldinu og segist svo eiga barhsi, nr engri tt.

Vi viljum ekki sj einhverja sem taka 50, 100 ea 200 % af llu sem vi gerum.

Vi vitum a stru flgin heimsvsu, me dreift eignarhald, lenda strax eigu stjrna flagana.

Einhver fr ln banka til a kaupa 6 til 7 % hlut flgunum.

er komin meiri eign, en eignarhlutur eirra sem mta aalfund.

egar ert binn a n stjrnar taumunum flaginu, rur 100 lgfringa til a kaupa brf flaginu, til dmis 10%.

fer stjrnarformaurinn me umbo flagsins aalfundum.

annig ert binn a yfirtaka flagi.

essi aferafri er vel ekkt.

etta verur a vera grundvllur vitrnnar umru um fjrmlin, peninganna, a er bkhaldi.

Lfeyririnn er einnig aeins bkhald, og ekkert getur greitt lfeyri nema rttmiklir framleislu atvinnuvegir og skilvirkt jflag.

N setjum vi alla rkisstyrkta lfeyririnn, og skoum hvort a gengur, og ef a gengur ekki lagfrum vi allt lfeyriskerfi.

Skoa gegnumstreymis lfeyriskerfi.

Skoa hvort gfulegt er a hafa sj til uppbyggingar, fyrir sland, og heimsvsu.

essi sjur gti veri hugsaur til a byggja upp lndin, innvii og atvinnulf, ekki gjafa f.

Ef eitthvert land vill f sitt RARIK, sna Landsvirkjun, og svo framvegis, getum vi hjlpa til.

A sjlfsgu viljum vi a einstaklingurinn geti ntt skpunargfu skipulagshfileika sna.

Vi urfum a lesa um nstareynda trar manninn okkur,

Og svo skaparann okkur, sem drfur fram allar framfarir.

Ekki tma,

Egilsstair, 26.10.2016 Jnas Gunnlaugsson


Villuleit boi Pka


The Government ... has shamefully abdicated its traditional responsibility to create a supply of money, publicly, and debt-free, for the people.

Otherwise, we will continue with the situation today where the private banking system is acting as the national money supply mechanism and levels of debt will continue to go through the roof, along with bank profits, and our taxes!

http://www.ismennt.is/not/jonasg/jg/jg06/deptfreemoney/deptfreemoney.html

000

Prosperity: Freedom from Debt Slavery, is a four page monthly journal on Money Reform.
To subcribe follow this link

Our Money Reform brings Democracy and Freedom from Debt Slavery

The following speech was delivered by Alistair McConnachie at the American Monetary Institute's 2005 Monetary Reform Conference, at the Essex Inn, 800 South Michigan Avenue, Chicago, on Thursday 29th September 2005, at 6pm. It was published in the September 2005 issue of Prosperity.

Thank you. I have been asked to speak about the Bank of England, and its place within the monetary system of the UK. After that, I want to tell you about the monetary reform which we in the United Kingdom are proposing.

Tomorrow we are going to be hearing about the US Federal Reserve, from Mr William Hixson -- author of the two wonderful books, Triumph of the Bankers and A Matter of Interest, and one of the founders of COMER, the Canadian-based Committee on Monetary and Economic Reform, from whom we will also be hearing this evening.

Now, the Federal Reserve is differently constituted from the Bank of England, but given the political will, both institutions are able to be reformed to deliver the results which we as Money Reformers are seeking.

"Given the political will" -- creating that political will, is the real challenge for us.

THE BANK OF ENGLAND
The Bank of England is Britain's Central Bank. Just as individuals and businesses keep accounts at commercial banks, so commercial banks and government keep accounts at the Central Bank -- in our case, the Bank of England.

The Bank of England began in 1694 when King William needed money to fight a war against France. A company promoter by the name of William Paterson came up with the idea of a bank. It would raise 1.2 million and then lend a million to the Crown, at a high rate of interest. In return for the loan, it was incorporated by Royal Charter as the "Bank of England" which became the government's banker. Thus began the British national debt.

It wasn't until 1946 -- 252 years after it was first established -- that the Bank was nationalised and brought more firmly under the control of the British government. In practice this didn't change very much although it meant that the State acquired all the shares, and that Governors and Directors were to be chosen by the Sovereign on the advice of the Prime Minister. Further, the Chancellor of the Exchequer reserved powers to give the Bank formal directions.

Richard Greaves has written a very good article, which I commend to you, in the January 2005 issue of Prosperity, "Shedding some Light on the Bank of England". Copies are at the back of the hall, and I'm using his research when I tell you that:

Today, operating as it does as the bankers' bank, it is to the commercial banks (ie the High Street banks) what the commercial banks are to the public.

Just as we may deposit money with commercial banks, so commercial banks in turn keep deposits with the Bank of England. The amount of cash that a commercial bank can buy up from the Bank of England to meet its customers' cash withdrawals is limited to the amount of deposits it has in its account at the Bank of England and/or what it can borrow from the Bank of England or from other banks. Commercial banks borrow from the Bank of England in exactly the same way that individuals and businesses borrow from commercial banks

However, it is much more significant to note that whilst the Bank of England is now state-owned the fact is that our money supply is once again almost entirely in private hands, with 97% of it being in the form of interest bearing loans of one sort or another, created by private commercial banks.

Indeed this is now where the real power resides -- with commercial banking.

The Bank of England is now essentially a regulatory body that supports and oversees the existing system. It is sometimes referred to as "the lender of last resort" in so far as one of its functions as the bankers' bank is to support any bank or financial institution that gets into difficulties and suffers a run on its liquid assets. In these circumstances, it is not obliged to disclose details of any such measures, the reason being so as to avoid a crisis in confidence -- confidence being something on which the current system is very dependant.

However beyond that, it is no longer a major player in the lending/money creation market. Its annual accounts reveal that its loans and profits are only a fraction of those of a major commercial bank such as Barclays, and it only holds a very small amount of government stocks, so it is no longer really lending to government either -- that function has largely passed to the merchant banks.

Most of its profits come from what is known as the "issue department" -- the department of the bank which is responsible for printing and distributing bank notes and coins. These are purchased by the high street banks to meet their customers' demands for cash and the various banks have their accounts at the Bank of England debited accordingly. Basically, the profits from this operation belong to the state and are transferred to the Treasury, thus being added to the public purse.

THE PROFITS FROM THE NOTE ISSUE GO TO THE PUBLIC PURSE
The Bank of England Annual Report 2005 states that for the year 2004/2005, "the profits of the note issue were 1,618 million (2003/2004 1,234 million). The change was the net effect of more notes in circulation on average during the year and higher interest rates. These profits are all payable to HM Treasury." (p.34)
http://www.bankofengland.co.uk/publications/annualreport/2005report.pdf

So we see here that the Bank of England is quite open about the fact that the profit from its note issue -- that is, the difference between what it earns by selling the notes at face value to the commercial banks, minus its cost of printing, minting and distributing them -- goes to the Treasury.

That is, the profit goes right into the public purse as an effective debt-free input -- this benefit is traditionally termed "seigniorage".

Now imagine if everyone was using notes and coins instead of electronic forms of money. The debt-free benefit to the public purse would be immense! It would be in the billions and billions of pounds, and taxes would fall massively.

Indeed, in 1948, around half of all money in circulation (46%) was notes and coins which were created debt-free by the government, with the profits going directly to the public purse.

However, as the demand for electronic, cheque book and credit card money has risen, the demand for notes and coins has fallen.

This means that most money circulating in society is now private bank debt-based money in electronic and cheque book form -- around 97% of money circulating.

As a result, the private banks are making vast profits from this situation. And because the government has an ever-declining source of seigniorage revenue, our taxes go up to repay the money which the government has to borrow from this private banking system!

*****

At the same time, more and more people are swallowed up in ever-rising levels of private debt.

Over the years, the Government has simply ignored what has been happening to the money supply. It has ignored the fall in the demand for notes and coins and its subsequent loss of seigniorage.

In other words, it has shamefully abdicated its traditional responsibility to create a supply of money, publicly, and debt-free, for the people.

*****

As Money Reformers, we are saying that in addition to regulating the banking system, it is the responsibility of government to maintain a basic stock of money in circulation which is free from debt at its point of creation.

If society enjoyed the benefit of a 46% debt-free money stock in 1948, then there is no reason why we shouldn't continue to enjoy such a benefit today -- although this doesn't necessarily have to be in the form of notes and coins. It can be in the form of electronic money, created debt-free for public purposes.

*****

Otherwise, we will continue with the situation today where the private banking system is acting as the national money supply mechanism and levels of debt will continue to go through the roof, along with bank profits, and our taxes!

*****

FOCUSING OUR MESSAGE
So what do we propose to do about all this?

If we want to take an idea into the mainstream, we need to concentrate on one of the core issues, and we need to come up with a practical policy to apply it, which is politically workable in the circumstances of the moment.

Focusing in this way is a core strategy of the American Monetary Institute.

If we don't have focus, then the message won't take off and fly. So, while I am not going to speak about the specific reforms suggested by the American Monetary Institute, I want to tell you about what we in the UK are proposing.

THE POLICY WHICH WE PROMOTE IS
what we call The Prosperity Proposal: Publicly-created Debt-free Money. Slogan: "Money for the People, and by the People: The Democratic Imperative".

SO, WHAT IS PUBLICLY-CREATED DEBT-FREE MONEY?
It is money created by the government of the day, debt-free.

That is, debt-free! Not "interest-free". Not "low-interest". But debt-free -- money which does not have to be paid back.

Money Reformers say the government has the power, indeed the duty and the responsibility, to create money debt-free, instead of running to the private banking system for it.

We have seen that it already does this via the note issue.

It needs to extend that principle to other forms of money, such as electronic-based money.

We call this money, "publicly-created money" since it is created on behalf of the people of the nation by their elected government. It belongs to the people of the nation, and it works for the benefit of the people of the nation.

It is not intended to benefit the banking system or any private interests -- as so much government borrowing does today.

INSTITUTE A PUBLIC MONEY DEPARTMENT AT THE B of E
Practically speaking, our innovation proposes an extension to the Bank of England -- which we could call the Public Money Department -- which would be chartered to create debt-free money for the exclusive purpose of financing investment in Public Fixed Assets -- that is, in things like maintaining the schools and hospitals.

This "publicly-created money" would be a debt-free input of money to the Treasury, just like the production and sale of the notes and coins represents a debt-free input to the Treasury -- of, as we have seen, somewhere around 1.6 billion last year.

The means is c, but the principle of debt-free seigniorage enjoyed by the public purse, is long established.

As we have seen, it has simply been eroded by the evolution of the private banking system whose bank-created money has come to exist primarily in non-cash form. That is, in electronic form, transmitted by information technology.

Similarly, our innovative "publicly-created money" can be created as non-cash money. It does not have to be in the form of notes and coins.

People should not have to suffer in an increasingly usurious and debt-soaked society just because the demand for notes and coins has fallen.

It is the responsibility of the government to maintain the debt-free money stock for the benefit of the people.

No other innovation could benefit so many and harm none. The basic research is done and recorded. What remains is to generate credibility and overcome the inertia within government and the civil service establishment.

WHY WE CALL IT "PUBLICLY-CREATED MONEY"
We don't call it "government-created" or "state-created money" because some people have an aversion to the words "government" and "state". Such aversions can lead to bogus objections on the basis of a misunderstanding of words alone. "Oh, you can't let the government create money", such people will say in a knee-jerk manner.

SOME OBJECTIONS WE HAVE FACED
Indeed, one of the main objections which we have encountered and which is found across the political spectrum is that we should not be giving this power to the government because the government, it is claimed, "cannot be trusted".

We would answer this in several ways. We answer it Technically, and we answer it Philosophically.

A technical answer would be that we could ensure that the amount of publicly-created money was limited to a certain amount or percentage each year, which would be objectively measured in some way. For example, it could be the amount necessary to pay off the interest on the national debt, or it could be an amount equivalent to the difference between the rise in the overall money supply from one year to the next -- as was suggested by Michael Rowbotham in his book, The Grip of Death.

The point here being that there would be an objective measure. With this specific amount there could be strict limitations imposed upon its allocation. Perhaps only to be spent on Fixed Public Assets such as schools, hospitals, and roads, or public sector projects decided by the elected Parliament or Congress.

Of course, these spending choices will create controversy, but such political debate is at the heart of our democratic system.

A MODEST PROPOSAL -- DEMOCRATIC CONTROL
Philosophically though, we would answer the question by saying that at the heart of our Reform is a modest proposal -- democratic control!

Money for the People and by the People! Money Reformers, highlight the fundamental monopoly power of money creation enjoyed by the few to the detriment of the many.

We highlight the fundamental question of who has the power to create the money in the first place.

We say, our money supply is a public resource, which should not be exploited for private profit. The creation of money should be a public service, under public control for the public good.

We point to the fact that many of the economic and social ills which beset society and the world today are due to the power to create money being concentrated in the hands of a tiny minority, rather than democratically distributed in the hands of the People.

So, "If", as James Gibb Stuart has written, "we can break the Monopoly of Credit -- the control over the 97%, and rising, of our money supply, presently created by the banking system -- then we have established the right of government to create more, on behalf of the people." (Prosperity, June 04 -- also May 02, June 03 and Jan 04)

MONEY REFORMERS ARE QUESTING FOR REAL DEMOCRACY
Now some others will say, "Well, that is all very well and good but best not talk about that until we have the democratic changes in place which will allow us to implement these reforms safely."

However, life doesn't work that way. You don't start doing something until every other little thing around you is perfect. That would be neurotic.

Rather, you begin as soon as you can and you engage with the reality that is around you, which will always be less than perfect!

So, let us seek Money Reform at the same time as we seek Democratic Reform.

Let us not wait for one before we promote the other.

Let us be clear to locate our programme for reform -- and to locate our opposition to the present monopoly of the banking system -- within a wider struggle for democracy and for social justice, for Americans, for Canadians, for Australians, for British people, and for all the people of the world.

In closing, let me wish the greatest success to the American Monetary Institute and to the valuable and inspirational work which Stephen Zarlenga and his colleagues are doing here.

We have such a powerful truth on our side. Let us tell it widely.

We have such a powerful light on our side.

Let us shine it brightly upon the darkness of the debt-ridden international financial system which enslaves so many.

And by so doing let us, and the American Monetary Institute, bring freedom from debt slavery to Americaand to the world.


Peningar, selar. - Coins and bills.

Og a besta, g lnai r ekki neitt.

sl

Peningar, selar.

Coins and bills

Spuni, gamla sagan, skr.

*--- Spuni---*

klikka mynd, verur hn strri.

gamla-sagan-05

Egilsstair, 25.10.2016 Jnas Gunnlaugsson


mbl.is Segir hagfringum a stunda alvru strfri
Tilkynna um vieigandi tengingu vi frtt

Fstur eying, fstur deying. Hva a gera? heimili og brnin a hafa forgang? Er a konan og barni sem eiga a f mestu umhyggjuna? Eru a svokallair fjrfestar sem f mesta umhyggju nna egar eir hirtu bir flksins?***

ttir a margfaldast og uppfylla jrina,

a er a sem flestar slir,

kmust kennsluna jrinni,

mannslkama.

skilur myndirnar, tt skiljir litla ensku.

000

He performed 1,200 abortions. In new viral video, he wants you to see what abortion really looks like

sl

https://youtu.be/5THDmys8z30

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/he-performed-1200-abortions.-in-new-videos-he-wants-you-to-see-what-abortio

og youtube

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5THDmys8z30

klikka myndina, verur hn strri

LiveAction-LevantinoDismembermentVideo-02232016-810px_810_500_55_s_c1

000

WATCH: A third of pro-choice women change their view of abortion after seeing this viral video

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/watch-one-third-of-pro-choice-women-change-their-view-of-abortion-after-wat

..klikka myndirnar, vera r strri..

ur en g skoai myndbandi...

abortion-00

ur en g skoai myndbandi...

abortion-01

ur en g skoai myndbandi...

abortion-02

Eftir a hafa skoa myndbandi...

abortion-02-2

Eftir a hafa skoa myndbandi...

abortion-03

Eftir a hafa skoa myndbandi...

abortion-04

Eftir a hafa skoa myndbandi...

abortion-05

Tilhugunar.

WP_20160424_10_46_38_Pro

Egilsstair, 04.06.2016 Jnas Gunnlaugsson

***Kreppuflttan, endurteki

Hva er feminismi, er hann a eya sjlfum sr?

Jnas Gunnlaugsson | 11. desember 2015

Er a hlutverk forustu manna Evrpu a eya eim sem eir hafa forustu fyrir?


mbl.is etta skiptir okkur miklu mli
Tilkynna um vieigandi tengingu vi frtt

40.000 manns var stefnt til Parsar fund, a sgn vegna mengunar, .. og yru ailar a f lg samykkt, .. til a ra vi ennan vanda... lg sem hentuu strfyrirtkjunum 14.9.2016 | 23:09

40.000 manns var stefnt til Parsar fund, a sgn vegna mengunar, .. og yru ailar a f lg samykkt, .. til a ra vi ennan vanda... lg sem hentuu strfyrirtkjunum

Er etta svona? vinsamlega lttu mig vita ef g misskil eitthva.

g er a reyna a skilja etta.

Eru a glballistar sem eru a vinna fyrir tlendu strfyrirtkin.

Ef landbnaurinn er eyilagur, erum vi h erlendun ailum um matvru.

Eru glbalistar, heimsvaldasinnar? og embttismannakerfi, bin a koma erlendu kjti inn slenskan marka, merktu?

Okkur er sagt a kjti, erlenda s menga af aukaefnum, til dmis pensilni, og ess vegna su sklarnir ornir nmir fyrir pensilninu.

egar 40.000 manns var stefnt til Parsar a sgn vegna mengunar, voru fyrirlestrar haldnir um vandrin.

San var sagt a til a ra vi etta, yru ailar a f lg samykkt,fyrir lndin sameiginlega, til a ra vi ennan vanda.

a er fyrst varst gerur hrddur, og san bein a slst hpinn til a bjarga heiminum.

Inn lginn settum vi svo reglur sem henta strfyrirtkjunum.

annig fengum vi mengaa kjti, og annig fengum vi lginn um a flki gti leita rttar sns hinum msu lndum, h bsetu.

etta vri svo gott fyrir litla manninn, a er Jn og Gunnu.

En, auvita spila g altaf me ig, ea me mig.

Jn og Gunna skrifuu um einhvern einokunar hring Finnlandi.

Einokunar fyrirtki fr ml vi Jn og Gunnu, Irlandi.

Jn og Gunna skildu ekkert mlskjlunum sem au fengu, og hfu enga peninga til a ra sr endur og lgfringa.

essar aferir voru notaar kring um 1900 egar fjrmlakerfi bj til hverja kreppuna af annarri, til a f flki til a heimta breytingar.

bjuggu fjrmlafyrirtkin til n lg bak vi tjldin, og ar var alltaf tala um a jin yrfti a eiga peningaprentunina, svo a ekki yri svindla Jni og Gunnu.

Nju lgin voru samykkt, og var allt peninga bkhalds valdi komi til einka-fjrmlafyrirtkjanna.

Htti nna.

Loftslagsbreytingar eftir gst H Bjarnason ttu allir a lesa.

Metanl

Egilsstair, 14.09.2016 Jnas Gunnlaugsson

Egilsstair, 24.10.2016 Jnas Gunnlaugsson


mbl.is ingkona stt vi loftslagshp
Tilkynna um vieigandi tengingu vi frtt

Cancer, krabbi, allir skoi og velti vngum. Vi erum takmarkair skilningnum. Ef vi leggjum saman, getum vi yfirfari a sem msir hafa skrifa um sjkdminn. arna gti leynst einfld lkning. Fi vini og vandamenn til a kynna sr mlin.

Cancer, krabbi, allir skoi og velti vngum.

Vi erum allir eitthva takmarkair skilningnum.

Ef vi leggjum saman, getum vi yfirfari a sem msir hafa skrifa um sjkdminn.

arna gti leynst einfld lkning.

Fi vini og vandamenn til a kynna sr mlin.

egar fyrirtkin urfa a f sjklinga til a greia skuldir

og til a skila ari, getur margt gerst.

Forstjrinn og rekstrarteymi er reki ef fyrirtki jnar ekki snum tilgangi, a borga stofnkostna, og skila mr eigandanum ari.

Cancer The biggest lie in the world * Blow Your Mind * Velt vngum um krabbamein og fleira

Jnas Gunnlaugsson | 12. oktber 2016

Vangsveltur. etta eru aeins vangaveltur. Vi heyrum alltaf um erfileika hj flkinu. Leitum lausna. Cancer The biggest lie in the world * Blow Your Mind * https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ccnxWIHUiyc Einhver i etta slensku, og sendi mr, og g

Cancer basically needs a low oxygen environment to survive. Basically 99% of the time a terminal cancer victim body is a thousand time more acidic than normal. By 1931 Nobel Prize Winner Dr. Otto Warburg

Jnas Gunnlaugsson | 29. ma 2016

Why Cancer and Diseases Can’t Survive in an Alkaline Body. 1931 Nobel Prize By 1931 Nobel Prize Winner Dr. Otto Warburg The Root Cause of All Cancers – By 1931 Nobel Prize Winner Dr. Otto Warburg Cancer basically needs a low oxygen

Fra okkur fremst lfkejuna. mengum vi minna, notum minni orku og lifum meir stt vi nttruna. A htta a bora flki nsta orpi.

Jnas Gunnlaugsson | 14. janar 2016

Fra okkur fremst lfkejuna. mengum vi minna, notum minninorku og lifum meir stt vi nttruna. A htta a bora flki nsta orpi. etta var sett bloggi: sthildur Cesil rardttir 5.1.2016 | 14:56 Veganar. J hva er n a s a

Forvitnilegt hj Agn

Jnas Gunnlaugsson | 31. janar 2014

Forvitnilegt hj Agn Magnesum og sink MAGNESUM , OFBELDI OG UNGLYNDI... http://agny.blog.is/blog/agny/entry/309634/ ooooo BLRUHLSKIRTILS MISTKIN SEM MILJNIR KARLMANNA GERA http://agny.blog.is/blog/agny/entry/1334220/ Jhann Kristinsson ,

kall, - i arna ti

Jnas Gunnlaugsson | 13. aprl 2013

kall i arna ti.. Leiti i internetinu a bestu lausnum fyrir allt a flk sem berst fyrir lfi snu vegan hinna msu sjkdma. g er alltaf a heyra af flki sem stendur essari barttu. a eru ekki allir me mikla tungumlakunnttu og mikin

Krabbi, Cancer

Jnas Gunnlaugsson | 20. desember 2012

Krabbi, Cancer Forvitnilegt http://www.herad.is/y04/1/2012-12-19-cancer.htm eir sem eru gir ensku, skri etta fyrir okkur hinum. Eg. 20.12.2012 jg

Cancer, Read, Read, Read

Jnas Gunnlaugsson | 29. jl 2012

Read, Read, Read http://www.herad.is/y04/1/2012-07-29-cancer.htm The issue http://dcawatch.com/home/ The issue Egilsstadir,29.07.2012 Jnas Gunnlaugsson Dreifu essu eins og lifandi getur. Publish this everywhere (" We all have been lead to believe

17-year-old devises potential cure for cancer

Jnas Gunnlaugsson | 18. mars 2012

http://www.herad.is/y04/1/2012-03-14-potential-cure-cancer.htm 17-year-old devises potential cure for cancer http://www.smartplanet.com/blog/science-scope/17-year-old-devises-potential-cure-for-cancer/12152

a er ekki anna hgt, en a vekja athygli, essu.

Jnas Gunnlaugsson | 17. mars 2012

http://www.herad.is/y04/1/2011-06-14-Cancer-cure-known-for-35-years/2011-06-14-Cancer-cure-known-for-35-years.htm a er ekki anna hgt, en a vekja athygli, essu. Er fundin lkning vi krabbameini? 14.6.2011 | 03:24 Hfundur Jn Steinar Ragnarsson

Can-we-eat-to-starve-cancer

Jnas Gunnlaugsson | 17. mars 2012

Can-we-eat-to-starve-cancer http://www.herad.is/y04/1/2011-06-05-Can-we-eat-to-starve-cancer/

Egilsstair, 23.10.2016 Jnas Gunnlaugsson


Vi urfum a kynna okkur standi. Rv, flytur frttir fr stru frttastofunum, essum 6 fyrirtkjum sem mata frttir okkur. g hef aeins veri a kynna etta.

Sett blogg: Halldr Jnsson

Enginn kristinn

21.10.2016 | 18:41

000

Vi urfum a kynna okkur standi.

Rv, flytur frttir fr stru frttastofunum, essum 6 fyrirtkjum sem mata frttir okkur.

g hef aeins veri a kynna etta.

YOU ARE WITNESS TO A GREAT AWAKENING, A MEDIA RENAISSANCE - did you know 6 corporations control 90% of all you read, see and hear?

klikka myndina, verur myndin strri

2016-10-24-engin-kristinn-islam-fjlmidlar

2016-10-24-engin-kristinn-islam-fjlmidlar-04

verur a muna sgu Rsslands, egar lest etta.

Welcome to our Spring Crowdfunding

Campaign of 2016!

YOU ARE WITNESS TO A GREAT AWAKENING

...A MEDIA RENAISSANCE

Did you know 6 corporations control 90%,

of all you read, see and hear?

2016-10-24-engin-kristinn-islam-fjlmidlar-06

bond-fjolmidlana-08

https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/russia-insider-a-media-awakening#/

Slir

Frttaflutningnum er strt.

Jnas Gunnlaugsson | 28. jl 2016

Agerir ISIS Iraq og Srlandi jarmor, segir Kerry, Stjrnsslan USA og The House, fulltradeildin USA.

18.3.2016 | 00:02

Spurninginn er hvort etta er raun str gegn Kristni?

Jnas Gunnlaugsson | 10. jl 2016

In Iraq, Christians are down to around 300,000 from about 1.4 million in 2003, according to 2015 estimates from a UK-based Catholic NGO. In Syria, there are now just 500,000 Christians, compared to over 1.25 million in 2011.

Jnas Gunnlaugsson | 2. mars 2016

Hva eru Kristnir a hugsa

Jnas Gunnlaugsson | 28. nvember 2015

Barttan verldinni

Jnas Gunnlaugsson | 12. nvember 2013


a er frlegt a friarseggurinn, yfirgangsmaurinn, fer strax af sta me fri og yfirgang, ef a hann heldur a hann komist upp me a.

Sett blogg:

Einar Bjrn Bjarnason

Forseti Filippseyja segist halla sr a Kna, a Bandarkin hafi tapa - mean honum er teki me kostum og kynjum opinberri heimskn Kna

000

sl

arna virist Washington hafa sagt a USA mundi ekki skipta sr af svisbundnum deilum, og er strax fari landvinninga. "Yang, called on Washington to "honour its promise of not taking a position in territorial disputes""

Jnas Gunnlaugsson | 14. jn 2016

a er frlegt a friarseggurinn, yfirgangsmaurinn, fer strax af sta me fri og yfirgang, ef a hann heldur a hann komist upp me a.

Yang biur Washington a hafa heiri lofori um a skipta sr ekki af svisbundnum deilumlum.

"Yang, called on Washington to "honour its promise of not taking a position in territorial disputes"

arna virist sem a stjrnin USA hafi gefi tyfirlsingu um afskiptaleysi, og Knverjar treysta v svo vel, a eir fara landvinninga.

fer USAareyna a stva Kna,og vtar Kna, USA fyrir a standa ekki vi or sn um a lta friar og rsar ailann reittan.

etta er kennslubkardmi um mistk alja stjrnmlum.

Egilsstair, 21.10.2016 Jnas Gunnlaugsson

000

Vibt bloggi hj Einar Bjrn Bjarnason

essi Yang virist eiga nokku undir sr.

etta hj mr byggir allt essari grein fr MSN NEWS

Beijing refuses to move on sea disputes as US meet ends

http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/beijing-refuses-to-move-on-sea-disputes-as-us-meet-ends/ar-BBtYjlW

China's top diplomat Yang Jiechi addresses the US-China Strategic and Economic Dialogues in Beijing, on June 7, 2016

Provided by AFPChina's top diplomat Yang Jiechi addresses the US-China Strategic and Economic Dialogues in Beijing, on June 7, 2016

Egilsstair, 21.10.2016 Jnas Gunnlaugsson

000

Og aftur vibt bloggi hj Einar Bjrn Bjarnason

Til n, Einar Bjrn Bjarnason.

China's top diplomat Yang Jiechi, skrir stefnu Knverskra stjrnvalda.

Og til n Bjarne rn Hansen,

Geta jir Evrpu og Amerku, krafist eignar eim lndum, ar sem essi lnd stunduu fiskveiar og kaupmensku, rhundru, og reyndar rsund.

Sennilega gtu Rmverjar, Rm, tala, Frakkland, skalans, Holland, Bertland, Dnnnmrk, Noregur, Svj, Finnland, Freyjar, krafist eignar spildum.

g man og s skip fr sj af essum jum Seyisfiri, voru au landlegum, vegna veurs.

Einnig er sagt fr veiiskipum fr Bandarkjunum, Boston, og trlega hefur Kanada komi vi sgu.

g tla ekki a fara a leita a essu netinu, en a tti a vera auvelt.

Hgt er a lesa sgu hinna msu fiskveiija og n nlega kom saga hvalveia vi sland eftir Smra Geirsson.

Bi ykkur vel a lifa.

Egilsstair, 22.10.2016 Jnas Gunnlaugsson


Nsta sa

Innskrning

Ath. Vinsamlegast kveiki Javascript til a hefja innskrningu.

Hafu samband