icesave-2 - Htun

http://www.herad.is/y04/1/2010-11-17-icesave-2.htm

N eru fyrirtkin ltin segja.

Fyrirtkin f ekki ln nema a i greii ICAVE.

getum vi fyrirtkin teki ln, og svo greii i slendingar lnin,

me nsta, ICAVE-2.

Vi getum a sjlfsgu styrkt Veraldarbankann, Evruna,

og sem eiga vandrum, ekki minna en Evrpa gerir,

helst aeins meira mann.

byrjum vi v a Bretar greii eftir hu mati, tjni sem var,

egar eir stvuu slensku bankana,.

uru vein fyrir tlnum slensku bankana nt a hluta.

Nst metum vi sama htt, tjni sem hlaust af v a Bretar lgu hald

slenska gjaldeyrissjinn.

gtu slendingar ekki greitt fyrir nausynjar, mat og lyf.

Nst neyddu Bretar, Evrpa, slendinga til a skrifa upp snepil,

letter of understanding, um a slendingar skulduu

Bretum og Hollendingum geysilegar upphir.

Auvita skrifuum vi undir til a f mat og lyf.

etta orsakai mikil vandri fyrir slensk fyrirtki og slenska rki.

Hr arf a f h mat skaanum fyrir allt slenska fjrmlakerfi.

a sr hver heilvita maur a fjrmlakerfi veraldarinnar,

er ekki skipulagt fyrir jirnar, flki.

Henry Ford og Thomas Edison hldu fund desember 1921

og sendu tvr greinar The New York Times,

ara 04.12.1921 og hina 06.12.1921.

http://www.ismennt.is/not/jonasg/jg/jg06/debtslavery/debtslavery.html

arna reyna eir a f stjrnvld til a breyta fjrmlakerfinu,

annig a einkabankarnir leggu ekki 120 % til 150 %

alla fjrmgnun verldinni.

Bankarnir vildu ekki sleppa essum tekjum,

og eim vldum sem etta fri eim.

N ttum vi a dreifa essum frleik um verldina,

og laga etta me mikilli festu og

me mikilli st og umhyggju.

Egilsstair, 17.11.2010, Jnas Gunnlaugsson

.

Hrna fyrir nean, eru Henry Ford og Thomas Edison a segja a egar bankarnir prenta peninginn eiga eir allt 100%

og svo egar bankarnir taka vextina af prentaa peningnum, koma 20% (2% 10 r) ea 50% (2% 25 r) ,

ea ef til vill mun hrri vextir dag, ri 2010

"Now, that is what Henry Ford wants to prevent. He thinks it is stupid, and so do I, that for the loan of $30,000,000 of their own money the people of the United States should be compelled to pay $66,000,000 -- that is what it amounts to, with interest. People who will not turn a shovelful of dirt nor contribute a pound of material will collect more money from the United States than will the people who supply the material and do the work. That is the terrible thing about interest. In all our great bond issues the interest is always greater than the principal. All of the great public works cost more than twice the actual cost, on that account. Under the present system of doing business we simply add 120 to 150 per cent, to the stated cost.

"But here is the point: If our nation can issue a dollar bond, it can issue a dollar bill. The element that makes the bond good makes the bill good. The difference between the bond and the bill is that the bond lets the money brokers collect twice the amount of the bond and an additional 20 per cent, whereas the currency pays nobody but those who directly contribute to Muscle Shoals in some useful way.

" ... if the Government issues currency, it provides itself with enough money to increase the national wealth at Muscles Shoals without disturbing the business of the rest of the country. And in doing this it increases its income without adding a penny to its debt.

"It is absurd to say that our country can issue $30,000,000 in bonds and not $30,000,000 in currency. Both are promises to pay; but one promise fattens the usurer, and the other helps the people. If the currency issued by the Government were no good, then the bonds issued would be no good either. It is a terrible situation when the Government, to increase the national wealth, must go into debt and submit to ruinous interest charges at the hands of men who control the fictitious values of gold."


Sasta frsla | Nsta frsla

Bta vi athugasemd

Ekki er lengur hgt a skrifa athugasemdir vi frsluna, ar sem tmamrk athugasemdir eru liin.

Innskrning

Ath. Vinsamlegast kveiki Javascript til a hefja innskrningu.

Hafu samband