Bloggfrslur mnaarins, jn 2017

Dennis Lee, an American hero, goes over why they killed the electric car! He shows a super efficient electric motor that could be powered with just two deep cycle Marine batteries! You'd never have to go to the gas station,

New Motor Killed The Electric Car! Dennis Lee Explains

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7QxL4oCa8Jw

Dennis Lee, an American hero, goes over why they killed the electric car! He shows a super efficient electric motor that could be powered with just two deep cycle Marine batteries! You'd never have to go to the gas station, just replace the two batteries when they finally gave out years down the road!

Spread the word about this technology so everybody knows we're being completely ripped off! It's time to wake up! Share on all social networks and email lists so we can change history together!

klikka, strri mynd,

2017-06-28-vatns-gas

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7QxL4oCa8Jw

Egilsstair, 28.06.2017 Jnas Gunnlaugsson


Russian Scientists Discover Cure to Homosexuality, - The study concluded that INAH [part of the hypothalamus] is dimorphic with sexual orientation, at least in men, and suggests that sexual orientation has a biological substrate.

Russian Scientists Discover Cure to Homosexuality

http://worldnewsdailyreport.com/russian-scientists-discover-cure-to-homosexuality/

Novosibirsk|Dr. Dimitri Yusrokov Slamini of the Russian Institute for Medical Science in Novosibirskand his team of researchers have discovered what they claim to be a new vaccine which could prevent early symptoms and eveThe study concluded thatINAH [part of the hypothalamus] is dimorphic with sexual orientation, at least in men, and suggests that sexual orientation has a biological substrate.

Ira

n cure humans from homosexuality, if treated at a young age.

Russian scientists developed the so-called antidote based on a 1959 scientific researchpublished under the title Organizing action of prenatally administered testosterone propionate on the tissues mediating mating behavior in the female guinea pig by Charles H. Phoenix, an american researcher.

n, China and Saudi Arabia have been the first countries to show interest in the new discovery.

Xenoestrogen are a type of estrogen mimickers found in synthetic or natural chemical compounds. Synthetic xenoestrogens such as PCBs, BPA and phthalates have been also been found to have estrogenic effects on living organisms and to disrupt the endocrine system explains Dr. Yuri Krutchev, who took part in the experiment. Injecting specific quantities of testosterone helps to unset this artificial biological unbalance which occurs mostly in part because of environmental pollution and an excess of estrogen mimickers in our modern environment he adds.

The new discovery has attracted much criticism from lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) organizations around the Globe, yet a few country leaders have outspokenly showed support and interest for the research.Iran, China and Saudi Arabia have been the first countries to show interest in the new discovery.

American and European researchers have expressed much skepticism upon receiving the news.

000

Egilsstair, 27.06.2017 Jnas Gunnlaugsson


Ef a eru 10% mnus vextir, hverfur upphin smsaman. Bankinn vill a enginn geti teki peningana sna t r bankanum selum. Bannkinn vill lsa peningana inni bankanum, mean sparif hverfur. ess vegna vill bankinn banna reiuf, sela.

24.6.2017 | 10:09

The ban on cash is coming. Soon. But since central banks have no other choice than to continue imposing negative interest rates, the only logical option is to ban cash and force consumers to hold their money within the banking system.

The ban on cash is coming. Soon. -

http://www.dailyalternative.co.uk/the-ban-on-cash-is-coming-soon/

Daily Alternative News - Alternative News -

Something Different for the People! | Alternative News

Wakeup

The ban on cash is coming. Soon.

By MrG

February 24, 2016

This is starting to become very concerning.

The momentum to ban cash, and in particular high denomination notes like the 500 euro and $100 bills, is seriously picking up steam.

On Monday the European Central Bank President emphatically disclosed that he is strongly considering phasing out the 500 euro note.

Yesterday, former US Treasury Secretary Larry Summers published an op-ed in the Washington Post about getting rid of the $100 bill.

Prominent economists and banks have joined the refrain and called for an end to cash in recent months.

The reasoning is almost always the same: cash is something that only criminals, terrorists, and tax cheats use.

In his op-ed, Summers refers to a new Harvard research paper entitled: Making it Harder for the Bad Guys: The Case for Eliminating High Denomination Notes.

That title pretty much sums up the conventional thinking. And the paper goes on to propose abolishing, among others, 500 euro and $100 bills.

The authors claim that without being able to use high denomination notes, those engaged in illicit activities the bad guys of our title would face higher costs and greater risks of detection. Eliminating high denomination notes would disrupt their business models.

Personally I find this comical.

I can just imagine a bunch of bureaucrats and policy wonks sitting in a room pretending to know anything about criminal activity.

Its total nonsense. As long as there has been human civilization there has been crime. Crime pre-dates cash. And it will exist long after they attempt to ban it.

Perhaps even more hilarious is that many of these bankrupt governments have become so desperate for economic growth that they now count illegal drug activity and prostitution in their GDP calculations, both of which are typically transacted in cash.

So, ironically, by banning cash these governments will end up reducing their own GDP figures.

Whats really behind this? Why is there such a big movement to ban something that is used for felonious purposes by just a fraction of a percent of the population?

Cash, it turns out, is the Achilles Heel of the financial system.

Central banks around the world have kept interest rates at near-zero levels for nearly eight years now.

And despite having created massive bubbles and enabled extraordinary amounts of debt, their policies arent working.

Especially in Europe, the hope of stoking economic growth (and even the sickening goal of inflation) has failed.

So naturally, since what theyve been trying hasnt worked, their response is to continue trying the same thing and more of it.

Interest rates across the European continent are now negative.

Japanese interest rates are now negative.

And even in the United States, the Federal Reserve has acknowledged that negative interest rates are being considered.

They have no other choice; raising rates will bankrupt the governments they support and derail any fledgling economic growth.

Look at how low interest rates are in the US and yet 4th quarter GDP practically ground to a halt. They simply cannot afford to raise rates.

As global economic weakness continues to play out, central banks will have no other option but to take interest rates even further into negative territory.

That said, negative interest rates will be the destruction of the financial system.

Because sooner or later, if banks have to pay negative wholesale interest rates to each other and to the central bank, then eventually theyll have to pass those negative rates on to their customers.

Many banks have already started doing this, especially on larger depositors.

Weve seen this in Europe where some banks charge their customers negative interest to save money, and in some extraordinary circumstances, pay other customers to borrow money.

Its total madness.

Theres a certain point, however, when interest rates become so negative that no rational person would hold money in the banking system.

Eventually people will realize that theyre better off withdrawing their money and holding physical cash.

Sure, cash doesnt pay any interest. But it doesnt cost any either.

If you have a $200,000 in your savings account at negative 1%, youd have to pay the bank $2,000 each year.

Clearly it would make more sense to buy a safe and hold most of that money in cash.

Problem is, the banks dont have the money.

For starters, theres literally not enough cash in the entire financial system to pay out more than a fraction of all bank deposits.

More importantly, banks (especially in the US and Europe) are extremely illiquid.

They invest the vast majority of your deposit in illiquid loans or securities of dubious long-term value, whatever the latest stupid investment fad happens to be.

And many banks have been engaging in a substantial balance sheet shift, rotating bonds from whats called Available for Sale to Hold to Maturity.

This is an accounting trick used to hide losses in their bond portfolios. But it also means they have less liquidity available to support bank customer withdrawal requests.

The natural side effect of negative interest rates is pushing people to hold money outside of the banking system.

Yet its clear that a surge of withdrawal requests would bring down that system.

Banks dont want that to happen. Governments dont want that to happen.

But since central banks have no other choice than to continue imposing negative interest rates, the only logical option is to ban cash and force consumers to hold their money within the banking system.

Make no mistake, this is absolutely a form of capital controls. And its coming soon to a banking system near you.

daily alternative | alternative news The ban on cash is coming. Soon.

via The ban on cash is coming. Soon. Sovereign Man.

000

Central-banks

18.3.2012 | 15:25

000

Egilsstair, 24.06.2017 Jnas Gunnlaugsson


mbl.is Tu sund kallinn ekki frum
Tilkynna um vieigandi tengingu vi frtt

Ef a eru 10% mnus vextir, hverfur upphin smsaman. Bankinn vill a enginn geti teki peningana sna t r bankanum selum. Bannkinn vill lsa peningana inni bankanum, mean sparif hverfur. ess vegna vill bankinn banna reiuf, sela.

Jnas Gunnlaugsson - jonasg-eg.blog.is

24.6.2017 | 10:09

The ban on cash is coming. Soon. But since central banks have no other choice than to continue imposing negative interest rates, the only logical option is to ban cash and force consumers to hold their money within the banking system.

The ban on cash is coming. Soon. -

http://www.dailyalternative.co.uk/the-ban-on-cash-is-coming-soon/

Daily Alternative News - Alternative News -

Something Different for the People! | Alternative News

Wakeup

The ban on cash is coming. Soon.

By MrG

February 24, 2016

This is starting to become very concerning.

The momentum to ban cash, and in particular high denomination notes like the 500 euro and $100 bills, is seriously picking up steam.

On Monday the European Central Bank President emphatically disclosed that he is strongly considering phasing out the 500 euro note.

Yesterday, former US Treasury Secretary Larry Summers published an op-ed in the Washington Post about getting rid of the $100 bill.

Prominent economists and banks have joined the refrain and called for an end to cash in recent months.

The reasoning is almost always the same: cash is something that only criminals, terrorists, and tax cheats use.

In his op-ed, Summers refers to a new Harvard research paper entitled: Making it Harder for the Bad Guys: The Case for Eliminating High Denomination Notes.

That title pretty much sums up the conventional thinking. And the paper goes on to propose abolishing, among others, 500 euro and $100 bills.

The authors claim that without being able to use high denomination notes, those engaged in illicit activities the bad guys of our title would face higher costs and greater risks of detection. Eliminating high denomination notes would disrupt their business models.

Personally I find this comical.

I can just imagine a bunch of bureaucrats and policy wonks sitting in a room pretending to know anything about criminal activity.

Its total nonsense. As long as there has been human civilization there has been crime. Crime pre-dates cash. And it will exist long after they attempt to ban it.

Perhaps even more hilarious is that many of these bankrupt governments have become so desperate for economic growth that they now count illegal drug activity and prostitution in their GDP calculations, both of which are typically transacted in cash.

So, ironically, by banning cash these governments will end up reducing their own GDP figures.

Whats really behind this? Why is there such a big movement to ban something that is used for felonious purposes by just a fraction of a percent of the population?

Cash, it turns out, is the Achilles Heel of the financial system.

Central banks around the world have kept interest rates at near-zero levels for nearly eight years now.

And despite having created massive bubbles and enabled extraordinary amounts of debt, their policies arent working.

Especially in Europe, the hope of stoking economic growth (and even the sickening goal of inflation) has failed.

So naturally, since what theyve been trying hasnt worked, their response is to continue trying the same thing and more of it.

Interest rates across the European continent are now negative.

Japanese interest rates are now negative.

And even in the United States, the Federal Reserve has acknowledged that negative interest rates are being considered.

They have no other choice; raising rates will bankrupt the governments they support and derail any fledgling economic growth.

Look at how low interest rates are in the US and yet 4th quarter GDP practically ground to a halt. They simply cannot afford to raise rates.

As global economic weakness continues to play out, central banks will have no other option but to take interest rates even further into negative territory.

That said, negative interest rates will be the destruction of the financial system.

Because sooner or later, if banks have to pay negative wholesale interest rates to each other and to the central bank, then eventually theyll have to pass those negative rates on to their customers.

Many banks have already started doing this, especially on larger depositors.

Weve seen this in Europe where some banks charge their customers negative interest to save money, and in some extraordinary circumstances, pay other customers to borrow money.

Its total madness.

Theres a certain point, however, when interest rates become so negative that no rational person would hold money in the banking system.

Eventually people will realize that theyre better off withdrawing their money and holding physical cash.

Sure, cash doesnt pay any interest. But it doesnt cost any either.

If you have a $200,000 in your savings account at negative 1%, youd have to pay the bank $2,000 each year.

Clearly it would make more sense to buy a safe and hold most of that money in cash.

Problem is, the banks dont have the money.

For starters, theres literally not enough cash in the entire financial system to pay out more than a fraction of all bank deposits.

More importantly, banks (especially in the US and Europe) are extremely illiquid.

They invest the vast majority of your deposit in illiquid loans or securities of dubious long-term value, whatever the latest stupid investment fad happens to be.

And many banks have been engaging in a substantial balance sheet shift, rotating bonds from whats called Available for Sale to Hold to Maturity.

This is an accounting trick used to hide losses in their bond portfolios. But it also means they have less liquidity available to support bank customer withdrawal requests.

The natural side effect of negative interest rates is pushing people to hold money outside of the banking system.

Yet its clear that a surge of withdrawal requests would bring down that system.

Banks dont want that to happen. Governments dont want that to happen.

But since central banks have no other choice than to continue imposing negative interest rates, the only logical option is to ban cash and force consumers to hold their money within the banking system.

Make no mistake, this is absolutely a form of capital controls. And its coming soon to a banking system near you.

daily alternative | alternative news The ban on cash is coming. Soon.

via The ban on cash is coming. Soon. Sovereign Man.

000

Central-banks

18.3.2012 | 15:25

000

Egilsstair, 24.06.2017 Jnas Gunnlaugsson


essi gengishkkun krnunnar er skipulg. Ef bankinn lnar ekki htel, eignast bankinn ekkert. Ef bankinn lnar htel eignast bankinn htel. Vi vitum a bankinn, gerir ekkert nema a skrifa tluna.

Sett blogg: Jhann Elasson

ALLT SEM BENDIR TIL A N S "UPPGANGSTMINN" ENDA.......

http://johanneliasson.blog.is/blog/johanneliasson/entry/2198204/

000

essi gengishkkun krnunnar er skipulg.

Ef bankinn lnar ekki htel, eignast bankinn ekkert.

Bankinn skrifar aeins tluna.

Ef bankinn lnar htel eignast bankinn htel.

Bankinn skrifar aeins tluna.

Vi vitum a bankinn, gerir ekkert nema a skrifa tluna.

000

Ef eigendur htelanna geta reki htelin me ga, greia eir niur skuldina og eignast htelin.

f bankarnir lni a er tluna sem eir skrifuu til baka, og s tala er ekkert.

000

Ef fjrmlakerfi hkkar krnuna veri mia vi gjaldeyri, f ll tflutningsfyrirtki, og ferajnustan frri krnur fyrir gjaldeyririnn, og geta ekki greitt niur lnin.

000

Ef bankakerfi getur komi veg fyrir a fyrirtkin greii lnin, bankinn eignirnar.

000

Venjulegt nsta skref fjrmlafyrirtkjanna er a segja eins og 2008, a bankinn s tmur.

Banki er alltaf tmur.

000

Nst segjast fjrmlafyrirtkin ekki geta lna r tmum banka, eins og sagt var 2008.

egar bankar htta a lna, a er a skrifa peningabkhaldi, verur fljtt urr peningabkhaldi, peningum.

000

stvast fyrirtkin, og flki missir vinnuna.

reyna allir a selja, en bankinn segist engum lna til a kaupa, og stvast viskipti me fasteignir.

000

reyna ailar a selja 80%, svo 50%, til a borga skuldir.

segir bankinn, er a reyna a selja 50% veri, og er n eign farin.

000

g bankinn, tek allar eignirnar til mn, helst uppboum, til dmir 2% veri.

skuldar eignirnar fram, a g hafi n eignunum.

000

Hr hefur bankinn n llum eignunum til sn.

N ltur bankinn endurmeta eignirnar snar mia vi byggingakostna og tvfaldast eignirnar veri.

000

San selur bankinn eignirnar tvfldu ea refldu veri.

g er bin a fara yfir etta oft ur bloggunum mnum.

000

Central-banks

18.3.2012 | 15:25

000

Egilsstair, 23.06.2017 Jnas Gunnlaugsson

000

Og ess vegna a tskfa eirri hagtr sem drkar Mammon, ekki bara vegna ess a tt ekki hjgui hafa, eli snu er essi hagtr ill, byggir mannvonsku og mannhatri, og hn rst a sjlfri tilveru mannsins, mennskunni og si.

a er rangt a hefja hana til valda, a lta hana ra yfir samflagi okkar.

Og vi eigum aldrei a ka me henni.

mar Geirsson

000

http://jonasg-egi.blog.is/

http://jonasg-eg.blog.is/

Egilsstair, 23.06.2017 Jnas Gunnlaugsson


mbl.is Krnan sligar blaleigur
Tilkynna um vieigandi tengingu vi frtt

essi gengishkkun krnunnar er skipulg. Ef bankinn lnar ekki htel, eignast bankinn ekkert. Ef bankinn lnar htel eignast bankinn htel. Vi vitum a bankinn, gerir ekkert nema a skrifa tluna.

Sett blogg: Jhann Elasson

ALLT SEM BENDIR TIL A N S "UPPGANGSTMINN" ENDA.......

http://johanneliasson.blog.is/blog/johanneliasson/entry/2198204/

000

essi gengishkkun krnunnar er skipulg.

Ef bankinn lnar ekki htel, eignast bankinn ekkert.

Bankinn skrifar aeins tluna.

Ef bankinn lnar htel eignast bankinn htel.

Bankinn skrifar aeins tluna.

Vi vitum a bankinn, gerir ekkert nema a skrifa tluna.

000

Ef eigendur htelanna geta reki htelin me ga, greia eir niur skuldina og eignast htelin.

f bankarnir lni a er tluna sem eir skrifuu til baka, og s tala er ekkert.

000

Ef fjrmlakerfi hkkar krnuna veri mia vi gjaldeyri, f ll tflutningsfyrirtki, og ferajnustan frri krnur fyrir gjaldeyririnn, og geta ekki greitt niur lnin.

000

Ef bankakerfi getur komi veg fyrir a fyrirtkin greii lnin, bankinn eignirnar.

000

Venjulegt nsta skref fjrmlafyrirtkjanna er a segja eins og 2008, a bankinn s tmur.

Banki er alltaf tmur.

000

Nst segjast fjrmlafyrirtkin ekki geta lna r tmum banka, eins og sagt var 2008.

egar bankar htta a lna, a er a skrifa peningabkhaldi, verur fljtt urr peningabkhaldi, peningum.

000

stvast fyrirtkin, og flki missir vinnuna.

reyna allir a selja, en bankinn segist engum lna til a kaupa, og stvast viskipti me fasteignir.

000

reyna ailar a selja 80%, svo 50%, til a borga skuldir.

segir bankinn, er a reyna a selja 50% veri, og er n eign farin.

000

g bankinn, tek allar eignirnar til mn, helst uppboum, til dmir 2% veri.

skuldar eignirnar fram, a g hafi n eignunum.

000

Hr hefur bankinn n llum eignunum til sn.

N ltur bankinn endurmeta eignirnar snar mia vi byggingakostna og tvfaldast eignirnar veri.

000

San selur bankinn eignirnar tvfldu ea refldu veri.

g er bin a fara yfir etta oft ur bloggunum mnum.

000

Egilsstair, 23.06.2017 Jnas Gunnlaugsson

000

Og ess vegna a tskfa eirri hagtr sem drkar Mammon, ekki bara vegna ess a tt ekki hjgui hafa, eli snu er essi hagtr ill, byggir mannvonsku og mannhatri, og hn rst a sjlfri tilveru mannsins, mennskunni og si.

a er rangt a hefja hana til valda, a lta hana ra yfir samflagi okkar.

Og vi eigum aldrei a ka me henni.

mar Geirsson

000

http://jonasg-egi.blog.is/

http://jonasg-eg.blog.is/

Egilsstair, 23.06.2017 Jnas Gunnlaugsson


Global warming is all wet, Giaever said in a speech entitled Global Warming Revisited he gave on July 1 to scientists from 90 countries attending the 65th annual Nobel Laureate Meeting in Lindau, Germany.

Nobel Winner to Obama on Global Warming: 'Mr. President, You're Wrong'

http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/kathleen-brown/nobel-prize-winning-physicist-obama-dead-wrong-global-warming-0

By Kathleen Brown | July 17, 2015 | 2:46 PM EDT

Nobel Laureate Iver Giaever. (Climate Depot)

(CNSNews.com) -- President Obamas statements on global warming are dead wrong, said Nobel laureate Ivar Giaever, who rejected the president's claims that man-made global warming is causing climate change.

I think Obama is a clever person, but he gets bad advice. Global warming is all wet, Giaever said in a speech entitled Global Warming Revisited he gave on July 1 to scientists from 90 countries attending the 65th annual Nobel Laureate Meeting in Lindau, Germany.

Giaever, who was born in Norway and became a naturalized U.S. citizen in 1964, was one of three recipients of the Nobel Prize for Physics in 1973.

Although he endorsed Obama in 2008 along with more than 70 other Nobel-winning scientists, Giaever is now criticizing the presidents statements on climate change -- particularly his 2015 State of the Union remark that no challenge poses a greater threat to future generations than climate change.

"The biggest problem Obama faces is climate change? How can he say that?" Giaever asked. "I say this to Obama: 'Excuse me, Mr. President, but you're wrong.' He is dead wrong...

"So global warming really starts with these two people: Al Gore and [former United Nations climate head Rajendra] Pachauri," Giaever continued. "And what they did - they made this curve popular...And what did this curve measure? Well, this curve measures what is the average temperature for the world for a whole year...For one year. So there's an average temperature for the whole Earth for one year and that measures in a fraction of a degree.

"So what does that mean? I think probably nothing. Let me talk about that again: From 1880 to 2015, the temperature has increased from 288 K [degrees Kelvin] to 288.8 K - 0.3 percent. I think the temperature has been amazingly stable.

"If I take where I live in Albany, New York, there is roughly an 80 K difference between summer and winter at some time, so would you think that a 0.8 degree average on the Earth makes any difference to the climate in Albany? Is that sensible to you?...

"I would say that global warming basically is a non-problem. Just leave it alone, it will take care of itself, he added.

On July 3, 36 Nobel laureates attending the meeting signed the Mainau Declaration 2015 on Climate Change, which compared human-induced climate change to nuclear war, calling it another threat of comparable magnitude.

But Giaever reminded the assembled scientists that climate change has happened all the time, has happened everywhere, and has nothing to do with global warming.

So far we have left the world in a better shape than when we arrived, and this will continue, with one exception: we have to stop wasting a huge, I mean huge, amount of money on global warming. We have to do that, he said.

Giaever rejected the notion that man-made global warming is an incontrovertible truth, telling his Lindau audience that global warming really has become a new religion. Because you cant discuss it -- its not proper.

But he said he was concerned about the United Nations climate change conference, which will be held in Paris later this year.

I really worry about that, because when the conference was in Copenhagen, that almost became a disaster but nothing got decided. But now I think the people who are alarmists are in a very strong position. he warned, accusing them of resorting to scare tactics without having temperature data to back up their claims.

If climate change doesnt work to scare people, they can scare people by talking about the extreme weather. That must work, he joked, observing that the U.S. is currently seeing a low period in both hurricane and tornado activity.

Giaever resigned from the American Physical Society (APS) in 2011 over its official statement on global warming: The evidence is incontrovertible: Global warming is occurring. If no mitigating actions are taken, significant disruptions in the Earths physical and ecological systems, social systems, security and human health are likely to occur. We must reduce emissions of greenhouse gases beginning now.

In an email to APS executive director, he wrote: "In the APS it is ok to discuss whether the mass of the proton changes over time, and how a multi-universe behaves, but the evidence of global warming is incontrovertible?"

Although APS warned of the dangers of global warming, Giaever pointed out in his speech that there has been only a 0.3% increase in the global average temperature (GAT) between 1880 and 2015 (from 288 to 288.8 Kelvin), which he called amazingly stable.

Everything is going to hell. But the facts are that in the last 100 years we have measured the temperature, it has gone up 0.8 degrees and everything in the world has gotten better...We live better, we have better work, better health, better everything -- but if we go [up] another 0.8 degrees, were gonna die, I guess, he said sarcastically.

Giaever also does not perceive a threat in rising carbon dioxide (CO2) levels, noting that if you have more CO2 the plant grows faster...Its a wonderful thing, but they dont talk about that in Nature magazine, which he accused of wanting to cash in on the [global warming] fad.

I think the average temperature of the Earth is equal to the emperors new clothes. There was a boy who cried, The emperor has no clothes on. And I would cry out and say you cant measure the temperature for the whole Earth with such accuracy.

He added that the "optimal temperature" for the globe has never been establsihed.

What is the optimal temperature for the Earth? Is it the temperature we have right now? That would be a miracle. he said. Maybe its two degrees warmer. Maybe its two degrees colder. No one has told me what the optimal temperature is for the whole Earth.

Egilsstair, 16.06.2017 Jnas Gunnlaugsson


Og Gu skapai au, Adam og Evu, eftir sinni mynd.- Er hr veri a tala um Adam og Evu nmer tv? - Skilur viskan sguna? - Krleikurinn, stin, umhyggjan leii gerina.

How upgrading humans will become the next billion-dollar industry

http://www.marketwatch.com/story/how-upgrading-humans-will-become-the-next-billion-dollar-industry-2017-04-03

Fifty years from now, todays humans will be obsolete, historian Yuval Harari says

By Jeremy Olshan

Amazon

Detail of Homo Deus hardcover dust jacket.

Investors searching for the next transformative technology destined to turn a bunch of Ivy League dropouts into billionaires, and half the market into a loose slot machine, need only look in the mirror.

The greatest industry of the 21st century will probably be to upgrade human beings, historian Yuval Harari, author of the fascinating new book Homo Deus, told MarketWatch.

For the first time in history it will be possible to translate economic inequality into biological inequality. Yuval Harari

For all of humanitys scientific, economic and artistic achievements, we have neglected this ultimate self-improvement project, Harari said. Our bodies and brains, after all, still run on the same hardware and software that evolved some 200,000 years ago.

Alphabets GOOG, -0.27% GOOGL, -0.16% Google already has a unit devoted to overcoming death, Harari noted. And who can doubt that Apple AAPL, -1.40% will want to pick from this new tree of knowledge, as well, or that after conquering self-driving cars Uber, in spite of the antics of its CEO, will want to build an bermensch?

Dont miss: Top concerns for the future of aging Americans

As new technologies yield humans with much longer battery lives, killer apps and godlike superpowers, within the next six decades, if Harari is right, even the finest human specimens of 2017 will in hindsight seem like flip phones.

There is, of course, a catch. Many of us will remain flip phones, as the technology to upgrade humans to iPhones is likely to be costly, and regulated differently around the world. These advances will likely lead to greater income inequality than ever before, Harari said. For the first time in history it will be possible to translate economic inequality into biological inequality.

Such a divide could give rise to a new version of old racist ideologies that some races are naturally superior to others, Harari said. Except this time the biological differences will be real, something that is engineered and manufactured.

ALSO SEE: Imagine if everyone in the world had a fiduciary duty to act in your best interest

At the same time, these superhumans will have less and less to do, Harari, said, because robots and artificial intelligence will perform more and more of the jobs with which obsolete humans used to be tasked.

So what will these future humans do all day? Will we sail aboard an intergalactic cruise ship sitting on our butts while sucking down junk food like the future humans in Pixars DIS, -0.44% feel-good dystopian movie Wall-E?

Almost, Harari said.

The only serious answer I can give is they will play computer games, Harari said. Immersive, 3D virtual-reality games that will be far more fun and more exciting than anything in real life.

If that sounds straight out of an episode of Black Mirror, Harari noted that we have been playing variants on such games for thousands of years. This is actually not completely new religion is in a sense a virtual-reality game. There are a set of quite arbitrary laws, you have to gain points, and if you gain enough points in

this life you get to go on to the next level.

Given that choice, it may be preferable to remain a flip phone in a dad bod case.

000

Egilsstair, 17.06.2017 Jnas Gunnlaugsson


The wishful thinking of a Trump assassination is getting more threatening. No Republican is safe, whether its Jeff Sessions in the Senate on Tuesday, or Congressional Republicans at a baseball practice ... Told they were Republicans, he opened fire.

Trump was the real target

The wishful thinking of a Trump assassination is getting more threatening.

http://www.israelnationalnews.com/Articles/Article.aspx/20637

Contact Editor

Jack Engelhard,15/06/17 18:0

So it has come to this --

No Republican is safe, whether its Jeff Sessions in the Senate on Tuesday, or Congressional Republicans at a baseball practice in Virginia on Wednesday.

Wednesdays shooting, from a gunman identified as a Bernie Sanders supporter, hit and wounded House (GOP) Majority Whip Steve Scalise and others.

They were sent to the hospital.Scalises condition is apparently most serious, but all are hopefully expected to recover. But will the republic, seeing how the Democrats are on a tear; them and all leftists who call themselves the Resistance. That means resistance to President Trump.

The gunman (now dead from the heroic actions of the police) wanted to know whose team were playing ball there in Alexandria.

Told they were Republicans, he opened fire.

Trump is the real target.

Thats who theyre really trying to bag, if by Red Scare innuendos in Congress or by mockery that plainly hints at the wishful thinking of a Trump assassination.

From Stephen Colberts rant, to Kathy Griffins head-on-a stick, to Shakespeare in the Park substituting Trump for the bludgeoning of Caesar, we know what theyre thinkingand we can only guess who they may be influencing.

There are any number of nut cases out there who get the general idea.

Those of us who watched Tuesdays Senate hearing that featured Attorney General Jeff Sessions could only wonder when this will stop this fixation on Russia.

Apparently it wont stop any time soon. Sen. Mark Warner (D. Virginia) opened by demanding that Sessions make himself available for many more investigations still to come as if Sessions has no day job, and as if branding Trump and all of Trumps people no better than Russian spies will preoccupy Democrats from now until forever.

Have they no other business?

Do they ever listen to themselves talk, these Democrats, their desperation through nitpicking, to find something, anything that will stick?

Are they aware of their hysteria?

Who won this election anyway? Why are the Republicans, who did win, on the hot heat? Youd think it would be the other way round.

As for me, I thought a GOP sweep of the White House and Congress would send Hillary Clinton running for the hills.

She, not Sessions, would be begging for mercy. Or was it Sessions who was guilty of extreme carelessness with classified material?

Was it Sessions who destroyed evidence, even using a hammer to beat to death 30,000 e-mails?

No, all that was Hillary Clinton, aided by Huma Abedin and former Attorney General Loretta Lynch. Why are they sleeping safe and snug while Sessions sweats his way through another day at the Inquisition, pleading for his job and his reputation, already in tatters as Democrats thrill to their success at character assassination en route to Trump.

People say Sessions was feisty at Tuesdays Senate witch-hunt. I say he was lame.

I say he was lame from the moment he recused himself from the Russia probeand still lame for notbringing charges against Hillaryet al.

I say Republican lawmakers owe us an explanation. Explain, please, why you allow yourselves to be led by the nose by the party that lost?

New York-based bestselling American novelist Jack Engelhard writes regularly for Arutz Sheva. His books, including The Bathsheba Deadline, are available from Amazon and other retailers. Engelhard wrote the international bestseller Indecent Proposal and the award-winning Montreal memoir Escape from Mount Moriah. His latest is News Anchor Sweetheart. He is the recipient of the Ben Hecht Award for Literary Excellence. Website: www.jackengelhard.com

000

Allur hugmyndaheimur mannsins er til, og milljn sinnum meira. Einhversstaar sagi g: Auvita er Gu er til. N segi g, auvita er helvti til. Vi vitum a, vi sjum a.

14.9.2016 | 20:25

Egilsstair, 16.06.2017 Jnas Gunnlaugsson


a virist sem Albert Einstein segi eins og Nikola Tesla a allt komi fr kjarnanum, the Core, eins og Nikola Tesla sagi. Vi erum vanir a nota orin, fr heilgum anda, og fr Gui.

Sett blogg: Valdimar Samelsson

Wow air tlar a taka flttamennina beint til slands og ar me ISIS menn J hli n.

ef Asuflk fr bein flug er ekkert anna en a skr sig sem hlisleitenda me alla fjldaskildunaog bngo sland sem fyrsta land ber 100% skyldura hsa a flki. Eiga strgrasseraretta land og munum peningurinn sem liggur bak vi Wow air kemur einmitt fr Asu.

000

  1. Fyrsta athugasemd.

Flottur.

Vonandi fer a a kallast kostur a geta hugsa rkrnt.

Egilsstair, 07.06.2017 Jnas Gunnlaugsson

Jnas Gunnlaugsson, 7.6.2017 kl. 11:53

  1. nnur athugasemd.

Til n DoctorE

akka r fyrir a kenna okkur hgvr.

Vi minni spmennirnir, getum lrt af Nikola Tesla, og Albert Einstein.

000

a virist sem Albert Einstein segi eins og Nikola Tesla a allt komi fr kjarnanum,

the Core, eins og Nikola Tesla sagi.

Vi erum vanir a nota orin,

fr heilgum anda, og fr Gui.

000

essa sl verur a skoa -

http://jonasg-egi.blog.is/blog/jonasg-egi/entry/2192832/

Greind enga mguleika egar uppfinningar eru annars vegar.

Hugurinn arf a taka undir sig stkk

maur getur kalla a innsi ea eitthva anna

og fst niurstaa n ess a maur viti hvernig ea hvers vegna. -

Albert Einstein

000

Andlegir hfileikar eru gjf fr Gui, gulegri veru,

og ef vi einbeitum huga okkar a eim sannleika

lumst vi samhljm vi ennan ri mtt. -

Nikola Tesla

000

Nikola Tesla Greatest Secret EXPOSED 2017 The One Thing He Said That NOBODY Mentions

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ZziOPGcXSk

000

Egilsstair, 07.06.2017 Jnas Gunnlaugsson

Jnas Gunnlaugsson, 7.6.2017 kl. 19:55

000

  1. rija athugasemd.

akk DoctorE.

yngri rum hlt Einstein a eterinn, sem sagur var fylla rmmi vri vitleysa. Rmmi vri a mestu tm. etta var mr kennt skla.

Nikola Tesla sagi a vsindamennirnir vru rangri lei, reiknuu fyrst sm vitlaust og svo meira og meira vitlaust.

Nikola Tesla sem fri okkur flest raforkunni, orku framleisluna frNiagarafossvirkjunum, og rafmtorana til a nta orkuna, a gleymdum spennubreytunum, og hspennulnunum, sem geru okkur kleyft a flytja raforkuna, hundru klmeta.

ur var aeins hgt a flytja jafnstraumsrafmagni 1 klmetra, pls mnus einhverja km.

Nikola Tesla bau mannkyninu rjtandi orku, en uru ll bankavein kolanmunum, olulindunum og llum eim bnai verlaus, og bankar og orkulinda eigendur uru fyrir miklu tapi.

essum tma var Nikola Tesla komin nokku langt undan okkur kennslunni og vi skildum ekkert. talai hann um a allt vri geislar og bylgjur.

var hann sagur vitlaus.

efri rum viurkenndi Einstein Tesla, og sagi egar a fjlmilamaur spuri Einstein, hvernig a vri a vera gfaasti maurinn heiminum.

svarai Einstein, g veit a ekki, verur a spyrja Nikola Tesla.

Einnig voru vsindamenn almennt farnir a viurkenna eterinn, en nna er hann kallaur spa.

Vi ekkjum a essir gmlu, a vi trum allskonar vitleysu sem ungir menn, en reynslan hefur kennt okkur a endurskoa hlutina,vegna nrrar ekkingar og ns skilnings.

14

Fjra athugasemd.

gti DoctorE

Haft eftir Einstein, tti a vera aeins meira,

til a styja essa lyktum:

a virist sem Albert Einstein segi eins og Nikola Tesla a allt komi fr kjarnanum,

the Core, eins og Nikola Tesla sagi.

Vi erum vanir a nota orin,

fr heilgum anda, og fr Gui.

000

Innsi hugans er heilg gfa en hinn rkvsi hugur er tryggur jnn.

Vi hfum skapa jflag sem heirar jninn en hefur gleymt gfunni.

Albert Einstein

000

Innsi er eina raunverulega vermti.

Albert Einstein

000

a er engin rkrn lei til a komast a essum grundvallarlgmlum.

Innsi er eina leiin og v til hjlpar tilfinning um regluna sem liggur a baki ess sem sst.

Albert Einstein, skur kennilegur elisfringur (1879 - 1955)

000

g tri innsi og innblstur ...

Stundum er g sannfrur um a g hafi rtt fyrir mr tt g viti ekki hvers vegna.

Albert Einstein

000

egar Albert Einstein var spurur hvernig tilfinning a vri

a vera snjallastur allra heiminum svarai hann:

"g veit a ekki, verur a spyrja Nikola Tesla."

Albert Einstein

000

Greind enga mguleika egar uppfinningar eru annars vegar.

Hugurinn arf a taka undir sig stkk

maur getur kalla a innsi ea eitthva anna

og fst niurstaa n ess a maur viti hvernig ea hvers vegna. -

Albert Einstein

000

Egilsstair, 20.06.2017 Jnas Gunnlaugsson

Gangi ykkur allt haginn.

Egilsstair, 12.06.2017 Jnas Gunnlaugsson


Nsta sa

Innskrning

Ath. Vinsamlegast kveiki Javascript til a hefja innskrningu.

Hafu samband