Bloggfrslur mnaarins, febrar 2014

slensku vogunarsjirnir

slensku vogunarsjirnir

Mundu n a me KREPPUFLTTUNNI,

fyrst me VERBLGU, og san me VERHJNUN

ni fjrmlakerfi miklu af eignum flksins slandi.

oooo

Miki af essum eignum var bi til me v a papprast,

a er a selja verbrf fram og til baka,

en skapai engar vrur ea jnustu.

oooo

Eignirnar eru fastar krnum fjrmlastofnunum.

N sjum vi hvern fulltrann af rum, heimta a krnan veri leist r hftum.

oooo

a ltur t eins og vi hfum ntt peninga fyrirtkjanna okkar

til a kaupa eignir fjrmlastofnana slandi.

a ltur t eins og vi hfum teki ln til a kaupa eignir fjrmlastofnana slandi.

a ltur t eins og vi sum komnir spreng me, a greia af essum lntkum.

oooo

Forustumenn hinum msu greinum skla fjlmilunum,

og fara fram a rki flti sr a hjlpa okkur vogunarsja slendingum

a komast brott af landinu me afraksturinn af KREPPUFLTTUNNI

a er fyrst me verblgu og san me verhjnun.

oooo

Er leyfilegt a nota ori RN um ager sem hvorki gerandi ea olandi skilur?

Oooo

Vi erum eins og krakkar sandkassa, sem urfa gslu,

svo a vi skum ekki hvert anna.

Oooo

A sjlfsgu viljum vi hjlpa llum a komast t r essum vandrum.

En,, til a byrja me skulum vi rannsaka kreppuflttuna,

hvernig hn ni eignum flksins og fyrirtkjanna.

Oooo

Einnig rannskum vi hvernig eignirnar skiptu um eigendur,

trlega fr tlendum eigendum, til okkar slendinga.

oooo

N urfa allir a f asto fr rkinu til a endurheimta eignir snar.

oooo

Fyrst koma eir sem misstu eignir egar fjrmlastofnanir,

ltu eignirnar hverfa me KREPPUFLTTUNNI,

a er fyrst me verblgu, og san verhjnun.

Oooo

Og n dag er komi a eim a f hjlp fr rkinu,

sem n sitja uppi me eignirnar,

og miklar skuldir vegna kaupanna.

oooo

etta er efni grnleik, farsa.

Oooo

a eru a koma kosningar, og n skiljum vi flttuna

oooo

Eina ri er a lta nefndir skoa flttuna,

og greia san r henni.

A rum kosti sitjum vi uppi me skmmina.

a er ekki gott kosningum nstu ra.

Skoa betur seinna

Egilsstair, 26.02.2014 Jnas Gunnlaugsson


Indnesar fria "sktu," a manta ray.

Indnesar fria sktu.

a manta ray

Ferajnustan verur til ess a vi frium dralfi,

til a sna a feramnnum.

arna eru Indnesar a fria, vngja, flug sktu, (a manta ray),

sem er allt a 8 metrar milli vng bara enda.

eir telja a hn skapi allt a 1 miljn $ dollara yfir lftma sinn,

sem er allt a 50 r.

Ef skatan, (a manta ray), er veidd, leggur skatan sig 40 til 500 dollara.

A sjlfsgu hyggjum vi a okkar dralfi.

Hef ekki hugmynd um hvaa nafn essi skata hefur slensku.

Egilsstair, 22.02.2014 Jnas Gunnlaugsson

http://news.msn.com/world/indonesia-hopes-to-cash-in-on-manta-ray-tourism?app=1

Conservationists point to simple economics as an incentive. According to a study published last year in the online journal PLoS One,

a manta ray is worth up to $1 million (1.0000.000 US$) over the course

of its long lifetime,

thanks to tourists willing to pay generously for a chance to swim with the curious creatures that glide gracefully through the water by flapping their wide wings, almost as if flying.

They are worth only $40 to $500 dead.

Government officials were "so surprised that the tourism value is very high. That's a very powerful argument," said Tiene Gunawan, marine program director at Conservation International Indonesia.


Hi heilaga prestaflag

Hi heilaga andlega prestaflag.

Hi heilaga andlega prestaflag, eru eir einu sem gtu strt junum

til betri framtar.

N skulum vi muna a 3 miljarar af ftkasta flkinu jrinni

orsakar aeins 7% af loftmengun ,

en hlfur miljarur, af rkasta flkinu jrinni

losar 50% af allri loftmengun jrinni.

sl

a er ng til

a sem gera arf er ekki svo flki.

1

Fra okkur t r lfkejunni ar sem vi erum staddir dag,

og fara fremst lfkejuna, og bora korn, rtur, vexti, runga.

2

Htta a bora kjt.

er hgt a minnka rktarland 10 sinnum.

2

Htta a ba til etanl r korni.

Sagt er a 40% af kornuppskeru USA fari a framleia etanl.

Margir telja a a fari meiri orka til a ba til etanli, en s orka sem etanli skilar.

Etanli USA er framleitt me rkisstyrkjum.

Fyrir nokkrum rum var tali a 90.000 manns hefu framfri sitt af etanl framleislu.

Ef fer inn Google, raa hagsmunaailar ar inn lofgjrum um etanl framleisluna.

er sagt a essi og hin hliarframleislan (rkisstyrkurinn?) geri etanlframleisluna hagkvma.

arf a leita langt aftur leitarlistann til a f yfirsn.

Ethanol

3

Orkan

Semja um a hagsmunaailar sem framleia jarefnaeldsneyti,

hjlpi til vi a strminnka mengun vi notkun

kolum, olu og kjarnorkuverum.

Skoa me hagsmunaailum kola, olu og kjarnorkuinainum,

hvernig hgt er a nta msar orkulindir, svo sem r sem Nikola Tesla

sndi okkur liinni ld.

Mguleikarnir eru miklu fleiri.

Munum a verldinni er ekkert nema orka, verldin er orka.

Munum a

FAIRINN, og MURIN

spila orkupani og skapa

ALHEIMINN

Stundum segjum vi a au prjni sokk og a a s alheimurinn.

a verur a tba kennsluefni mia vi roska nemandans.

Vi urfum a yfirvinna hrslu hagsmunaaila (fjrfesta) orkuinainum

vi a eignir og tkni eirra veri relt, a er verlaus.

arna ti verldinni er fullt af flki sem er tilbi a leggja njar brautir

fyrir lfi, eins og mar Geirson myndi ora a.

Skoa sar.

Aal vandamli er a yfirvinna tta hagsmunaaila, fjrfestanna.

Egilsstair, 20.02.2014 Jnas Gunnlaugsson

http://jonasg-eg.blog.is/blog/jonasg-eg/entry/1226098/


a eru engin hft krnunni

a eru engin hft krnunni

oooo

a eru a koma kosningar,

htun?

Nei, stareynd.

oooo

Ef kynnir llum KREPPUFLTTUNA er ekki lengur hgt

a blekkja af okkur vxt erfiisins,

a er eignirnar og jnustuna.

oooo

getur keypt flestar tlendar vrur slandi,

og ferast um verldina fyrir launin n greidd krnum.

oooo

Hvers vegna eru fjlmilarnir sem er strt af fjrmlafyrirtkjunum,

stanslaust a skrifa um j hftum?

oooo

a skyldi ekki vera, rnsfengurinn,

a er eignir flksins landinu,

sem fjrmlastofnanirnar nu

me KREPPUFLTTUNNI,

fyrst me VERBLGU og san VERHJNUN.

oooo

Fjrmlafyrirtkin vilja reka loka hnykkinn KREPPUFLTTUNA

og koma rnsfengnum t r landinu.

oooo

Kreppuflttan, endurteki

mynning - Eignirnar frar r fasteigninni yfir tluna sem bankinn skrifai tlvuna hj sr.

oooo

Flki landinu arf a fylgjast vel me v hvort stjrnvld,

lta rannsaka KREPPUFLTTUNA,

annig a a veri llum ljst hvernig fjrmlafyrirtki,

hirti flestar eignir flksins.

oooo

egar loki er vi a rannsaka KREPPUFLTTUNA og kynna niurstuna vel,

getum vi teki vitrnar kvaranir um framhaldi.

oooo

A er fyrst me verblgu og san verhjnun,

eru eignir flksins ltnar hverfa

oooo

Fjrmlafyrirtkin lnau ekkert til uppbyggingar landinu,

en au hldu FJRMLABKHALDI.

oooo

Peningur er bkhald.

oooo

ert skyldugur til a hugsa, til ess varstu skapaur.

Hr a koma broskall.

oooo = slir blogginu mnu.

Egilsstair, 20.02.2014 Jnas Gunnlaugsson


Vertrygg, vertrygg eru bi vertrygg

Vertrygg, vertrygg eru bi vertrygg

Vertrygg og vertrygg vertrygging

Einhver sagi a vextir vru 4,2% og verblga 4,2% og vildi lta a sem 8,4% vexti.

arna eru 4,2% vextir og svo hefur krnan rrna um 4,2%,

a er allt lni hefur rrna um 4,2% og er lni v hkka krnum, um 4,2%,

til a lni haldi vergildi snu.

Peningakerfi er haft svo flki a fstir skilja a.

N tbum vi ntt peningakerfi, a er ntt peningabkhald.

Peningar eru bkhald.

Egilsstair, 15.02.2014 Jnas Gunnlaugsson

10 bloggfrslur fundust

Vertrygg og vertrygg vertrygging

Jnas Gunnlaugsson | 16. febrar 2013

Vertrygg og vertrygg vertrygging - Setti etta bloggi hj mari Geirssyni. http://omargeirsson.blog.is/blog/omargeirsson/entry/1283215/ - g s ekki betur en a svokllu vertrygg ln su vertrygg lkan htt og a sem vi kllum

Sjurinn sem var "0"

Jnas Gunnlaugsson | 16. febrar 2013

Sjurinn sem var "0" Setti etta bloggi hj mari Geirssyni. http://omargeirsson.blog.is/blog/omargeirsson/entry/1283215/ Mr snist a bi vertrygg ln og vertrygg ln, su vertrygg, og bi (jafn slm.)**** eins, en vertrygga lni

Tmur sjur + ein setning

Jnas Gunnlaugsson | 28. september 2013

Tmur sjur + ein setning Tmur sjur Hr btti g inn einni setningu. Vi notum til dmis 1%, 2%, 3%, 4%, ea 5% greislu til a eignast bina, a getur veri breytilegt Einhver sagi: tlar Sigmundur Dav ekki a n einhverja peninga fr

balnasjur, 18.10.2013

Jnas Gunnlaugsson | 18. oktber 2013

balnasjur, 18.10.2013 N er enn fari a ra um barmlasj. Sjir sem jin notar eiga ekki a vera ffa svokallara fjrfesta. Trlega hefur Alingi og rkistjrn fyrir hnd Alingis sett sjnum reglur sem sjurinn vinnur eftir. Me

Kostnaur vi hsnisln.

Jnas Gunnlaugsson | 27. janar 2014

Kostnaur vi hsnisln. Vertrygg ea vertrygg ln. http://jonasg-egi.blog.is/blog/jonasg-egi/entry/1283247/ Vi hugsum etta mjg vel, og gefum srfringum, og almenningi tma til a kynna sr efni. a er a koma betri sn fjrmlin. ur


a er ng til

a er ng til,

ef leitar lausna.

endurteki

Hr er g a hugsa um a lta ig lesa greinina

og endursegja svo efni rfum orum

sem gtu auki skilning okkar

sem eru aeins tregari.

Hr eru Socialistar a reyna a skilja

a gar lausnir eru til,

aeins a nota andan, hugsa, leita lausna.

a er algjr arfi a fkka flkinu um nokkra miljara.

http://www.ipegateway.com/?p=364

http://www.isj.org.uk/index.php4?id=671&issue=127<---- thiss one fails

if some address fails usegoogle.com to find it, for example: Dispelling the Malthus myth

Dispelling the Malthus myth

In the 200 years since the Reverend Thomas Malthus first penned his tract An Essay on the Principle of Population the question of the carrying capacity of the planet has repeatedly appeared. Most recently, mainstream debates around how to solve the question of climate change have boiled down to the simplistic argument that there are too many people.

The idea that a growing population means a greater pressure on natural resources, which eventually exceeds planetary capacity, is a simple common sense one. It is also wrong. Since Malthuss time, those who have followed in his footsteps have used such arguments to justify the worlds unequal distribution of wealth and argue against the possibility of social reform.

oooo

Niurstur fyrir maltus

5 bloggfrslur fundust

Buckminster R Fuller, Synergy, Maltus.

Jnas Gunnlaugsson | 3. ma 2012

Buckminster R Fuller, Synergy , Maltus . http://www.herad.is/y04/1/2012-04-22-You-should-read-Buckminster-04.htm You the inteligent people of the world should read Buckminster R. Fuller and teach us , in few easy to understand words . ***** Synergy View

oooo

USA, sna athygli, vera vibinn

Jnas Gunnlaugsson | 5. aprl 2013

USA Hver er a ginna USA til a fra varnarmtt og athygli til Austur Asu. Hvar er veikur punktur hj r USA? Athyglin arf a vera algild. Einhver sagi nlgt Austur Tmor, ekki veit g a. Kemur gnin r vntri tt? a er engin nausyn a fkka

oooo

Verum fulltrar gngta, lausna.

Jnas Gunnlaugsson | 21. aprl 2013

Verum fulltrar gngta, lausna. Do more with less Buckminster R Fuller Hlustai Silfur Egils a hluta dag. ar var tala um &#8220;hin miklu vandri&#8221;,takmrk (hag) vaxtarins, var mr hugsa til &#8220;hinna miklu vandra&#8221; um

Oooo

http://www.ipegateway.com/?p=364

http://www.isj.org.uk/index.php4?id=671&issue=127

Dispelling the Malthus myth

Issue: 127
Posted: 25 June 10

Martin Empson

Fred Pearce,Peoplequake:Mass Migration,Ageing Nations and the Coming Population Crash(Eden Project Books,2010), 12.99

In the 200 years since the Reverend Thomas Malthus first penned his tractAn Essay on the Principle of Populationthe question of the carrying capacity of the planet has repeatedly appeared. Most recently, mainstream debates around how to solve the question of climate change have boiled down to the simplistic argument that there are too many people. James Lovelock for instance argues that we are treating the planet so badly that we are likely to require a population crash to about one billion people before the world can again live within its ecological means. The Optimum Population Trust, who support research into lower optimum population sizes and campaign for a lower population in the UK, claim that human consumption of renewable resources is already overshooting Earths capacity to provide.

This argument fits perfectly with Malthuss own beliefs. It would have been recognised by writers such as Paul Ehrlich who spent the 1960s warning the world that its rapidly growing population would soon exceed the planets ability to provide. It is a recipe that ends up blaming the poorest people for the worlds problems.

The idea that a growing population means a greater pressure on natural resources, which eventually exceeds planetary capacity, is a simple common sense one. It is also wrong. Since Malthuss time, those who have followed in his footsteps have used such arguments to justify the worlds unequal distribution of wealth and argue against the possibility of social reform. Racism and scapegoating have flowed from the theory and have lead to forced sterilisation programmes, abortion and anti-immigrant legislation. The resurgence of these debates in the context of environmental crisis is a distraction from discussions about the political and economic changes required to tackle global warming.

It is in this context that Fred Pearces latest book is such an important contribution. Pearce turns just about every perceived wisdom about population on its head. From the publication of his first writings, Malthus ideas rapidly made it into the mainstream. Eugenicists tacked on their ideas of racial superiority to Malthusian concerns and the resultant poisonous mix made the perfect ideology to justify colonialism and empire. Malthus himself had become the first professor of political economy, teaching a generation of future administrators of empire about the perils of overpopulation and the pointlessness of charity. Charles Trevelyan, who oversaw the Irish Potato famine for the British government, was a student of Malthus.

The same ideas were at the back of Winston Churchills mind when he called for the sterilisation of the feeble-minded. Between the First and Second World Wars 60,000 imbeciles, epileptics and feeble-minded were compulsorily sterilised in the US, there were tens of thousands of further victims in countries as diverse as Sweden and Japan. The logic was taken to its brutal extreme by the Nazis, who sterilised half a million people, though as Pearce points out, their policies were widely admired.

In the post war period, Malthusian ideas were very much part of the ruling ideology of the Cold War. In the early 1950s, the Rockefeller Foundation was set up to ensure that industrial development was held back from countries like India until they had dealt with their population problem. Senior figures in United Nations organisations and Western governments believed that aid shouldnt be given to overpopulated countries, such as Japan, until they had reduced the numbers living there.

But for leading figures in the US administration at this time, concerns about overpopulation were not driven by a desire to improve the lives of the worlds poorest. Rather they saw the issue as a strategic threat to US dominance. One government report concluded that hungry people without enough land to grow food were likely to be seduced by dreams of land reform. Such dreams could lead to revolution, and something had to be done. In addition to the introduction of population control programmes, groups like the Rockefeller Foundation funded research into crop improvementsthe green revolution.

One of the problems for Malthuss followers, is that time and again their predictions havent come true. Todays population of Britain is far in excess of what was possible, according to Malthus. Billions of people did not starve to death in the developing world as Ehrlich had promised in the 1970s. The simple reason for this is the development of new and improved ways of producing food. The introduction of improved varieties of wheat, rice and maize massively increased the amount of food that was grown. In the 30 years from 1963, food output outstripped population growth by 36 percent in Asia as a whole, writes Pearce. In this light, he continues, the green revolution and population control were both part of a fix to preserve the capitalist status quo.

Changes in farming brought other consequencesthe risks of relying on a few crop varieties, the environmental problems caused by increased use of water as well as the consequences of over-reliance on pesticides. The green revolution hasnt led to an end to hungerthough
millions of people who might have starved to death can get food to eat. As Pearce points out, those who starve today do so because they cant afford to eat, rather than a shortage of food.

But for Pearce there is another unintended consequence. Because the green revolution allowed greater crop yields, less people were needed to farm the land. This led to smaller families and falling fertility levels in Asia. Pearce argues that falling fertility and crashing population are likely to be the real population problem for the 21st century. In many parts of Europe we are already experiencing a major population crisis. If fertility rates stay the same in countries like Italy and German native populations will fall by over 80 percent by the end of the century. Currently Europe is producing about 6 million babies a year. Thats 2 million less than needed to maintain the population. The population of Russia is dropping by half a million every year.

Increasingly, richer countries will be relying on immigration from the developing world to keep society running. But the developing world is also having fewer children. On current trends, world population is likely to start falling within a generation for the first time since the Black Death. The reasons for this are complex. Pearce highlights a number of factorsimproved access to contraception, for instance. He also notes how, when access to education improves, women tend to have fewer children. But he also makes the point that when there is access to decent healthcare and childcare, women are able to make the decision to have children.

An ageing, shrinking population brings its own problems. Already in France and Japan there are only two taxpaying workers to support each pensioner. In Italy the figure is as low as 1.3. Many economies will increasingly rely on migrants to work, flying in the face of the anti-immigrant rhetoric we currently are experiencing. But the conclusion that Pearce comes to is a positive one. Although from an environmental point of view, he doesnt believe we should stop worrying. Population is not the key factor in environmental destruction. What is important is the distribution of wealth.

The poorest three billion or so people on the planet (roughly 45 percent in total) are currently responsible for only 7 percent of emissions, while the richest 7 percent (about half a billion people) are responsible for 50 percent of emissions. Thus an increase in the population of the poorest areas of the world, despite what we are told by some environmentalists, will make little impact on climate change. The big question is how we change society in the richer world.

Fredrick Engels summed up Malthuss ideas simply: The earth is perennially overpopulated, whence poverty, misery, distress and immorality must prevail; that it is the lot, the eternal destiny of mankind, to exist in too great numbers, and therefore in diverse classes, of which some are rich, educated, and moral, and others more or less poor, distressed, ignorant and immoral.

For Marx and Engels, arguments of overpopulation hid a wider issue. They were a fig leaf covering racist ideas that justified the way that the world was. Today questions of population are still distorted by myths and lies. And they still serve to hide from us the wider question of how we must transform our own societies to save the planet and its people. It is for these reasons that Fred Pearce has done socialists engaged in the environmental movement, as well as those defending migrants and fighting racism, a tremendous service with this book.


Erum vi a lra?

Sett blogg: Gumundur sgeirsson

http://bofs.blog.is/blog/bofs/entry/1355484/

Slir

Mr snist a vi sum allir a vakna.

Einar Karl skrifai allvel um essi ml.

Gagnslaus samanburur

Vi verum a muna a verblgu rrnar krnan

og er ver minni me hverju rinu.

a er a lni lkkar a vergildi hverju ri.

Allur samanburur verur a vera fastvergildiskrnu.

Til dmis krnunni sem lni var teki.

eir sem veita lninog eir sem taka lnin skilja etta ekki.

essi hringavitleysa gengur ekki lengur.

g var a reyna a skra etta hr.

Kostnaur vi hsnisln.

Lra a peningur er bkhald.

Alingi verur a breyta eim reglum sem a setti balnasji.

balnasjur a lna fr SJI "0"me 0,5% umssluvxtum.

N breytum vi llum lnum annig

a balnasjur lnar beint fr SJI 0

me 0,5% umssluvxtum,

vertryggt launum.

Egilsstair, 14.02.2014 Jnas Gunnlaugsson

www.herad.is


Gu sraels er gur, og vill bjarga r. Auskili

Gu sraels.

Auskili

Gu sraels er gur, og vill bjarga r.

a eru gerir nar sem koma veg fyrir a a s hgt.

lesa hr

Jhannesarguspjall, Kafli 14, vers 6

oooo

http://tru.is/postilla/2006/06/ertu-i-godu-sambandi-vid-gud

Jn sgeir Sigurvinsson

Vi getum fundi svari me v a draga lyktun af vibrgum Jes vi v, a vera kallaur Gi meistari, v hann sagi: Hv kallar mig gan? Enginn er gur nema Gu einn. Ef Jess fellir ann dm um sjlfan sig a hann s ekki gur, gefur auga lei a enginn er ngilega gur ea rttltur til a eiga hjlpri Gus skili. Me rum orum: Maurinn getur ekkert gert af eigin rammleik, sem er ngu gott til a vega upp mti llum eim rangltu hugsunum, orum og gjrum, sem hann gerir sig sekan um lfsleiinni.

Hver getur ori hlpinn? Jess svarar: Fyrir mnnum eru engin r til essa, en fyrir Gui. Gu megnar allt. Hr erum vi algjrlega upp n og miskunn Gus komin.

oooo

Egilsstair, 12.02.2014 Jnas Gunnlaugsson


Nu eignum heimilanna og fyrirtkjanna me klkjum?

Sett blogg hj: Gumundur sgeirsson

http://bofs.blog.is/blog/bofs/entry/1354288/#comment3494168

Frleg umfjllun.

Hva arf a segja etta oft til a flki vakni?

ttir a kryfja til mergjar Kreppuflttuna hans Tnasar Jefferssonar.

Fyrst skipulg verblga og san verhjnun.

annig var eign heimilana og fyrirtkjanna ltin hverfa.

tk fjrmlafyrirtki eignirnar, og endurmat r.

sgu fjrmlafyrirtkina au hefu grtt miljara.

etta er svo einfalt a allir geta skili a.

Er a lglegt a n eignum heimila og fyrirtkja me klkjum?

http://jonasg-egi.blog.is/blog/jonasg-egi/entry/1243291/

http://jonasg-egi.blog.is/blog/jonasg-egi/entry/1229691/

A sjlfsgu eiga fjrmlastofnanir a skila llu til baka, til flksins.

www.herad.is

http://jonasg-egi.blog.is/blog/jonasg-egi/

Egilsstair, 10.02.2014 Jnas Gunnlaugsson


Allah og srael

Forvitnilegt

Eru Sntar a reyna a nlgast Gyinga?

Nafni Allah var hugsanlega nota af Gyingum, Kristnum,?

dgum Krists.

Allah, s sem er allt.

http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/177182#.UvbOek9oF9A

arna er mikil gerjun.

Hr er sm endursgn.

arna er haft eftir Sheikh Ahmad Adwan,

ar sem hann vitnar Kraninn

a Allah hafi thluta srael til Gyinganna fram a dmsdegi.

(Sura 5 Verse 21),

og a Gyingar su erfingjar a srael

(Sura 26 Verse 59)

Hann segir vi sem rangfra Kraninn:

hvaan fengu i nafni Palestina..

egar Allah hefur egar gefi v nafni LANDI HELGA

og nafna landi til sraels "barna"

fram a Dmsdegi

a er hvergi tala um Palestnu Kraninum.

i krefjist ess a srael s ekki til,

og a telst rs Kraninn, Gyinganna og srael.

Vegna essa mun ykkur mistakast,

og Allah mun leia ykkur villu og aumkja ykkur,

Allah sjlfur mun verja Gyingana, avarar Adwan.

Egilsstair, 09.02.2014 Jnas Gunnlaugsson

http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/177182#.UvbOek9oF9A

Allah has promised Israel to the Jews -- so saysSheikh Ahmad Adwan, a Muslim scholar living in Jordan, who declared on his Facebook page recently that "Palestine" doesn't exist.

BloggerElder of Ziyontranslated Arab news sources that this Saturday reported on Adwan's statements, in which he quotes the Koran saying Allah assigned Israel to the Jews until the Day of Judgement (Sura 5 Verse 21), and that Jews are the inheritors of Israel (Sura 26 Verse 59).

"I say to those who distort...the Koran: from where did you bring the name Palestine, you liars, you accursed, when Allah has already named it 'The Holy Land' and bequeathed it to the Children of Israel until the Day of Judgment," argued Adwan. "There is no such thing as 'Palestine' in the Koran."

"Your demand for the Land of Israel is a falsehood and it constitutes an attack on the Koran, on the Jews and their land. Therefore you wont succeed, and Allah will fail you and humiliate you, because Allah is the one who will protect them (i.e. the Jews)," warns Adwan.

The sheikh had more harsh words for the "Palestinians," calling them "the killers of children, the elderly and women" in using them as human shields in order to falsely accuse the Jews of targeting them. He reports having seen the same tactic used by "Palestinians" against the Jordanian army in the 1970s.

"This is their habit and custom, their viciousness, their having hearts of stones towards their children, and their lying to public opinion, in order to get its support," declared Adwan.

Adwan has previously said his support for the Jewish people "comes from my acknowledgment of their sovereignty on their land and my belief in the Koran, which told us and emphasized this in many places, like His (Allahs) saying Oh People (i.e the Children of Israel), enter the Holy Land which Allah has assigned unto you'" (Sura 5, Verse 21).

The Jews are a peaceful people according to Adwan, who says "if they are attacked, they defend themselves while causing as little damage to the attackers as possible. It is an honor for them that Allah has chosen them over the worlds meaning over the people and the Jinns (spiritual creatures) until the Day of Judgment. ...When Allah chose them, He didnt do so out of politeness, and He wasnt unjust other peoples, it is just that they (the Jews) deserved this.

Video (mostly in Hebrew) fromOrot TVshows Adwan's 2012 visit to Tzfat, where he met with the city's ChiefRabbi Shmuel Eliyahuand expressed his support for Israel:


Nsta sa

Innskrning

Ath. Vinsamlegast kveiki Javascript til a hefja innskrningu.

Hafu samband