Bloggfærslur mánaðarins, nóvember 2020
000 Endursagt.
Hér er CNN í beinni, sýnir það sem er kallað kosninga svindl, (Vote Fraud)
Demokratinn upp um 560 atkvæði og republikaninn niður um 560 atkvæði, í BEINNI útsendingu.
Ef aðeins er bætt við demokratann, þá getur mikil kjörsókn farið að valda grunsemdum.
Slóðin hér er á mínútunni þegar svindlið á sér stað.
https://youtu.be/dDU1kc3iK80?t=262
000
The Single Most Egregious Real-Time Example of Electronic Vote Fraud that Occurred Live on CNN! (Video)
Bloggar | Breytt s.d. kl. 21:06 | Slóð | Facebook | Athugasemdir (0)
Kosningasvik embættismanna.
8.11.2020 | 09:10
HOW OFFICIAL ELECTION FRAUD WORKS
November 6, 2020 in News, Video by RBN Staff
Source: BrasscheckTV
THE SAN FRANCISCO CASE
ITS DIRTIER THAN YOU CAN IMAGINE
Yes, official election fraud.
There is such a thing and in some big cities (and small places too), its as American as Apple Pie.
In this audio, we get into the details
OTHER GREAT MOMENTS IN US ELECTION FRAUD (REPUBLICANS DO IT TOO.)
How Hilary stole the 2016 primary
Karl Roves election fraud mechanic dies in a private plane crash
NOTE:
SF Gate has taken down 95% of the links from our research, but they left this story up. (Maybe theyll take this page down too. Cant have any loose ends lying around.)
Click here for: The DeBartolo-Brown Stadium/Mall Deal story
Click here to support Brasscheck
PDF from WhiteHouse.gov:
Bloggar | Breytt s.d. kl. 09:34 | Slóð | Facebook | Athugasemdir (0)
Hvað er hér á ferðinni? - EXTREMELY IMPORTANT - TRUMP PLANNED THIS WHOLE THING HE WON THE ELECTION!!!
7.11.2020 | 03:19
EXTREMELY IMPORTANT TRUMP PLANNED THIS WHOLE THING HE WON THE ELECTION!!! (Video)
Bloggar | Breytt s.d. kl. 15:31 | Slóð | Facebook | Athugasemdir (0)
The spray, which attacks the virus directly, contains a lipopeptide, a cholesterol particle linked to a chain of amino acids, the building blocks of proteins. This particular lipopeptide exactly matches a stretch of amino acids in the spike protein of the virus, which the pathogen uses to attach to a human airway or lung cell.
Before a virus can inject its RNA into a cell, the spike must effectively unzip, exposing two chains of amino acids, in order to fuse to the cell wall.
000
A nasal spray prevented Covid-19 infection in ferrets, a study finds.
Donald G. McNeil Jr. 5 hrs ago
A nasal spray prevented Covid-19 infection in ferrets, a study finds.
A nasal spray that blocks the absorption of the coronavirus completely protected ferrets it was tested on, according to a small study released Thursday by an international team of scientists. The study, which was limited to animals and has not yet been peer-reviewed, was assessed by several health experts at the request of The New York Times.
© Peter Kovalev\TASS, via Getty Images Ferrets are used by scientists studying flu, SARS and other respiratory diseases because the animals can catch viruses through the nose much like humans do.
If the spray, which the scientists described as nontoxic and stable, is proved to work in humans, it could provide a new way to fight the pandemic, with a daily spritz up the nose acting like a vaccine.
“Having something new that works against the coronavirus is exciting,” said Dr. Arturo Casadevall, the chairman of immunology at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, who was not involved in the study. “I could imagine this being part of the arsenal.”
The work has been underway for months by scientists from Columbia University Medical Center in New York, Erasmus Medical Center in the Netherlands, Cornell University and the University of Campania in Italy. The study was funded by the National Institutes of Health and the Columbia University Medical Center.
The spray, which attacks the virus directly, contains a lipopeptide, a cholesterol particle linked to a chain of amino acids, the building blocks of proteins. This particular lipopeptide exactly matches a stretch of amino acids in the spike protein of the virus, which the pathogen uses to attach to a human airway or lung cell.
Before a virus can inject its RNA into a cell, the spike must effectively unzip, exposing two chains of amino acids, in order to fuse to the cell wall. As the spike zips back up to complete the process, the lipopeptide in the spray inserts itself, latching on to one of the spike’s amino acid chains and preventing the virus from attaching.
“It is like you are zipping a zipper but you put another zipper inside, so the two sides cannot meet,” said Matteo Porotto, a microbiologist at Columbia University and one of the paper’s authors.
The work was described in a paper posted to the preprint server bioRxiv Thursday morning, and has been submitted to the journal Science for peer review.
Ferrets are used by scientists studying flu, SARS and other respiratory diseases because they can catch viruses through the nose much as humans do, although they also infect each other by contact with feces or by scratching and biting.
The protective spray attaches to cells in the nose and lungs and lasts about 24 hours, Dr. Anne Moscona, a pediatrician and microbiologist at Columbia and co-author of the study.
“If it works this well in humans,” she said, “you could sleep in a bed with someone infected or be with your infected kids and still be safe.”
Microsoft may earn an Affiliate Commission if you purchase something through recommended links in this article.
Egilsstaðir, 06.11.2020 Jónas Gunnlaugsson
Jónas Gunnlaugsson, 6.11.2020 kl. 23:40
Bloggar | Breytt s.d. kl. 02:25 | Slóð | Facebook | Athugasemdir (0)
Hér átti ég stutta íslenska þýðingu
000
I woke up convinced that God had given me a winning strategy, and a week later I had to try it on my first two patients and for every patient its working.
Its what Japan stumbled on it and Taiwan stumbled on it, an inhaled steroid. Theyre using a different one that Im using. The one Im using I think is better, inhaled budesonide with a nebulizer treatment.
Im also giving an antibiotic that will cover walking pneumonia, and other pneumonia thats called clarithromycin, and I also give zinc because that interferes with virus multiplication but the silver bullet is inhaled steroids, and the reason I use inhaled instead of IV, is because if you give a steroid IV or as a shot in the muscle that goes total body through the bloodstream, or as pills that goes total body, every time youre turning down the immune system, the ability to fight infection.
000
COVID-19 CURE PROTOCOL: Transcript of Dr. Richard Bartletts Bombshell Interview
TRANSCRIPT IS NOT EXACTLY WORD FOR WORD
Dr. Richard Bartlett | ACWT Interview 7.2.20
Debbie Georgatos [DG]: True story. Last night I moderated a panel speaking at a political event. Afterwards I met a doctor here in Midland, Texas who has been working with COVID19 patients, coronavirus patients. The article is at our website https://americacanwetalk.org/dr-richard-bartlett-shares-covid-information/
Joining us in our studio is Dr. Richard Bartlett who believes he found the silver bullet for COVID19. Can we start by telling our listeners about your medical background?
Richard Bartlett: 00:57 01:49 medical background, author, does medical missions in other countries.
01:51 mins DR: We already have an answer for this, and to put things in perspective in Taiwan theres over 25 million people stacked on top of each other. If they did social distancing theyd be out in the ocean floating around. During the whole pandemic, in Taiwan only seven people died. You can stack seven people in a minivan, so the next time your viewers see a minivan think thats how many people died in a country of 24 million people.
Im gonna tell you why thats the situation. Its the situation also in Japan, 121million people in Japan and they had less than 1,000 people die during the whole pandemic. In Singapore only 12 people died during the whole pandemic.
Iceland, well thats not possible according to what were being told in mainstream media but thats reality. Anyone can look it up. You can even look at the Johns Hopkins COVID website and youll see those numbers. Theyre hidden there but Im pointing them out because the people in Texas need to hear good news. In Dallas they need to hear good news, and I have good news.
DG: Youre gonna tell us eventually what theyre doing in these other countries.
DR: Theyre doing what Im doing, which is not hydroxychloroquine although that works. What theyre doing is an inhaled steroid. My silver bullet is inhaled budesonide, the brand name originally was Pulmicort. Now its generic, its super cheap about $200 for the total treatment if you pay cash. With insurance many of my patients are not even having to pay for it.
You use a nebulizer machine. Its an asthma medicine thats a respiratory anti-inflammatory for COVID, which is a respiratory inflammatory disease, and it works. 100% of my patients are alive. Ive been treating this since March. It takes five minutes to do a breathing treatment. You plug the machine in the wall, you put the premix, pre-measured medicine from the pharmacy into the little reservoir, you push the on button, and breathe it during five minutes. No mask. You use a little mouth piece that you hold in front of you and breathe for five minutes. Patients tell me they feel better during the first treatment. Their chest pain goes away, their shortness of breath goes away, their fever breaks.
Testimonials 04:46 06:34 mins
Lets talk about what COVID is. Its a respiratory virus that goes into the lungs, binds to ace receptors in the lungs and that triggers the release of inflammatory chemicals we call a cytokine storm thats a fancy word for inflammatory chemicals and enzymes that are released in the total body. So with COVID we have a killer thats never been around before. It is killing some people if theyre not treated, and so for 50% of the people they get it and dont even know they had it but for the 20% that are at risk there are treatments. We already have an answer.
Taiwan, 24 million people dont need to wait for a vaccine. They dont have a problem that you should vaccinate 24 million people for.
They only had seven die during the whole pandemic.
TESTIMONIALS
08:23 mins DR. This medicine has been out for over 20 years. Theres lots of research on it. Its safe. Big Pharma is not going to make a dime off it, nobody is going to make any money. Its $200 for the total treatment versus experimental, antiviral, hospitalization, and be a part of an experiment that costs over $3,100 just for the medicine. Then you pay at $15,000 at least to be in hospital during that time, unless you go to ICU and pay $30 or $40 thousand on top of being sick.
DG: So this is the medication you prescribed before COVID ever came along, for asthma?
DR: Yes, for asthma prevention. Theres 25 million people in America who have asthma and so this medicine is used routinely for over 20 years
to prevent asthma attacks. Its the first-line, preventive measure to protect people from having an asthma attack, is an inhaled steroid. Thats what theyre doing in Japan. Thats what theyre doing in Taiwan. Thats what theyre doing in Singapore.
DG: Even healthy people over there?
09:28 mins DR: Yes, with COVID theyre treating with inhaled steroids if they get COVID. So, for the 50% of the people who are gonna get it and never have symptoms they dont need medicine, they certainly dont need a vaccine, but for the 20% who are at risk of death if they dont get treated, we have an answer.
What we need to do is early testing, early treatment. We need to detect it early. America has the best health care system. We do early detection and early treatment for cancer, for heart disease, for stroke, for all kinds of infections but this is crazy that were doing what Communist China is doing, and were parroting that through the World Health Organization.
The World Health Organization is praising what China did, and so Italy follows suit, and look at Italy, over 30,000 people died in Italy so far
versus seven in a country where people are stacked on top of each other, 24 million, and so Im telling you they came upon the same solution that I came upon independently.
I started treating this in March and it works.
DG: I know youve used it before, so when you realized that COVID 19 was having such a disastrous thing in America did you need someone else to advise you so try this?
PROTOCOL USED BY DR. RICHARD BARTLETT
DR: In March, I was working a 48 hour shift in the emergency room, and I was distraught. Im a Christian and I was praying throughout that 48 hour shift. Id see patient after patient. I was thinking God, what am I gonna do if someone comes in here with COVID and theyre dying? Theyre gonna trust me to do the right thing for them and I dont have an answer. I laid down for a catnap between patients. I woke up convinced that God had given me a winning strategy, and a week later I had to try it on my first two patients and for every patient its working.
Its what Japan stumbled on it and Taiwan stumbled on it, an inhaled steroid. Theyre using a different one that Im using. The one Im using I think is better, inhaled budesonide with a nebulizer treatment.
Im also giving an antibiotic that will cover walking pneumonia, and other pneumonia thats called clarithromycin, and I also give zinc because that interferes with virus multiplication but the silver bullet is inhaled steroids, and the reason I use inhaled instead of IV, is because if you give a steroid IV or as a shot in the muscle that goes total body through the bloodstream, or as pills that goes total body, every time youre turning down the immune system, the ability to fight infection.
Every time youre dialing down the ability to heal but if you use it as a targeted source; one of my sons is a firefighter. If they shoot the fire extinguisher at the source of the fire, at the base of the fire, and all the flames go out.
This is like targeting the source of the inflammatory chemicals at the source, and all the fiery flames of inflammation are put out with the nebulizer treatment. The reason Im using a nebulizer is, if you use an inhaler 90 percent of the medicine never gets to where you need it. Research shows that but a nebulizer works.
DG: Theres great pushing in this country to just hold off, stay home, wait for the vaccine. When you discover something like this, what do you do as a doctor, when you discover a new treatment? How do you let other doctors know, how do you let the government know?
13:14 mins DR: Im doing everything I can thats why I stayed here an extra day, so I could be on the news with you, so we can let the good people of Dallas know we have solutions to this problem already. Last Friday I got a call from Ted Cruzs office. He heard about it. His chief of staff and another member called me and we had a 30-minute call.
Ive written a paper about this. We cite 51 articles that are tried and true from established journals, well well-recognized journals supporting what were doing. We sent the unpublished paper to Senator Cruzs office. So he is responsible for the information he has now, and now everybody knows he has it.
Also, I understand that President Trump will also have my unpublished paper. Were of course going to publish it but why wait six months till it gets published?
14:29 mins DR: This inhaled budesonide against COVID is currently being studied by the NIH now.
Their study will be over in October but its set up for failure at the start.
Let me tell you how. Early detection and early treatment are common sense, are the American healthcare system.
What were getting is what Communist China has forced on the whole world; dont wait until youre a breath away from death, wait until the house has burned two-thirds down and then seek help. This is what the CDCs telling us to do, and every authority is telling us, dont seek help if youve got mild to moderate symptoms, wait till you have severe symptoms.
I get calls from people who go to the ER because they feel bad, and theyre sent home with a positive test saying take Tylenol and tough it out at home. That is the standard of care being put out, thats a terrible plan for any health care problem especially one that can kill you, and for 20% of the people this is a killer. We dont know who that 20% is but if they have symptoms we have something we can do about it.
Bloggar | Breytt 28.11.2020 kl. 23:57 | Slóð | Facebook | Athugasemdir (0)
DR: We had a pandemic in 2009.
It was the H1N1 and you know what? THE FLU STRAIN GOING AROUND NOW IS H1N1.
Our patients who have the flu have H1N1.
Were not focused on that at all.
Its not as big a deal as they thought it was.
I just saw an article where Anthony Faucis warning we might have a new pandemic coming of H1N1 from China.
That strain is already here.
Theres a lot of misinformation, a lot of things blown out of proportion, and Im here to tell you the good news. Look at those countries, look at my results. I believe Dr. Lozano is doing the right thing as well.
000
All of that works against the re-election of President Trump.
000
slóð
Dr. Richard Bartlett | ACWT Interview PART 2 TRANSCRIPT
Bloggar | Breytt 7.11.2020 kl. 02:10 | Slóð | Facebook | Athugasemdir (0)
TRANSCRIPT OF THE MOST IMPORTANT VIDEO ON THE INTERNET TODAY!
Video and transcript: Crimes Against Humanity
Video already removed by YouTube:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kr04gHbP5MQ&feature=youtu.be
OPINION
BY REINER FUELLMICH
Originally posted at Global Research
The German Corona Investigative Committee has taken testimony from a large number of international scientists and experts since July 10, 2020.
Their conclusions are the following:
- The corona crisis must be renamed the Corona Scandal
- It is:
- The biggest tort case ever
- The greatest crime against humanity ever committed
- Those responsible must be:
- Criminally prosecuted for crimes against humanity
- Sued for civil damages
- Deaths
- There is no excess mortality in any country
- Corona virus mortality equals seasonal flu
- 94% of deaths in Bergamo were caused by transferring sick patients to nursing homes where they infected old people with weak immune systems
- Doctors and hospitals worldwide were paid to declare deceased victims of Covid-19
- Autopsies showed:
- Fatalities almost all caused by serious pre-existing conditions
- Almost all deaths were very old people
- Sweden (no lockdown) and Britain (strict lockdown) have comparable disease and mortality statistics
- US states with and without lockdowns have comparable disease and mortality statistics
- Health
- Hospitals remain empty and some face bankruptcy
- Populations have T-cell immunity from previous influenza waves
- Herd immunity needs only 15-25% population infection and is already achieved
- Only when a person has symptoms can an infection be contagious
- Tests:
- Many scientists call this a PCR-test pandemic, not a corona pandemic
- Very healthy and non-infectious people may test positive
- Likelihood of false-positives is 89-94% or near certainty
- Prof. Drosten developed his PCR test from an old SARS virus without ever having seen the real Wuhan virus from China
- The PCR test is not based on scientific facts with respect to infections
- PCR tests are useless for the detection of infections
- A positive PCR test does not mean an infection is present or that an intact virus has been found
- Amplification of samples over 35 cycles is unreliable but WHO recommended 45 cycles
- Illegality:
- The German government locked down, imposed social-distancing/ mask-wearing on the basis of a single opinion
- The lockdown was imposed when the virus was already retreating
- The lockdowns were based on non-existent infections
- Former president of the German federal constitutional court doubted the constitutionality of the corona measures
- Former UK supreme court judge Lord Sumption concluded there was no factual basis for panic and no legal basis for corona measures
- German RKI (CDC equivalent) recommended no autopsies be performed
- Corona measures have no sufficient factual or legal basis, are unconstitutional and must be repealed immediately
- No serious scientist gives any validity to the infamous Neil Fergusons false computer models warning of millions of deaths
- Mainstream media completely failed to report the true facts of the so-called pandemic
- Democracy is in danger of being replaced by fascist totalitarian models
- Drosten (of PCR test), Tedros of WHO, and others have committed crimes against humanity as defined in the International Criminal Code
- Politicians can avoid going down with the charlatans and criminals by starting the long overdue public scientific discussion
- Conspiracy:
- Politicians and mainstream media deliberately drove populations to panic
- Children were calculatedly made to feel responsible for the painful tortured death of their parents and grandparents if they do not follow Corona rules
- The hopeless PCR test is used to create fear and not to diagnose
- There can be no talk of a second wave
- Injury and damage:
- Evidence of gigantic health and economic damage to populations
- Anti-corona measures have:
- Killed innumerable people
- Destroyed countless companies and individuals worldwide
- Children are being taken away from their parents
- Children are traumatized en masse
- Bankruptcies are expected in small- and medium-sized businesses
- Redress:
- A class action lawsuit must be filed in the USA or Canada, with all affected parties worldwide having the opportunity to join
- Companies and self-employed people must be compensated for damages
Full Transcript
Hello. I am Reiner Fuellmich and I have been admitted to the Bar in Germany and in California for 26 years. I have been practicing law primarily as a trial lawyer against fraudulent corporations such as Deutsche Bank, formerly one of the worlds largest and most respected banks, today one of the most toxic criminal organizations in the world; VW, one of the worlds largest and most respected car manufacturers, today notorious for its giant diesel fraud; and Kuehne and Nagel, the worlds largest shipping company. Were suing them in a multi-million-dollar bribery case.
Im also one of four members of the German Corona Investigative Committee. Since July 10, 2020, this Committee has been listening to a large number of international scientists and experts testimony to find answers to questions about the corona crisis, which more and more people worldwide are asking. All the above-mentioned cases of corruption and fraud committed by the German corporations pale in comparison in view of the extent of the damage that the corona crisis has caused and continues to cause.
This corona crisis, according to all we know today, must be renamed a Corona Scandal and those responsible for it must be criminally prosecuted and sued for civil damages. On a political level, everything must be done to make sure that no one will ever again be in a position of such power as to be able to defraud humanity or to attempt to manipulate us with their corrupt agendas. And for this reason I will now explain to you how and where an international network of lawyers will argue this biggest tort case ever, the corona fraud scandal, which has meanwhile unfolded into probably the greatest crime against humanity ever committed.
Crimes against humanity were first defined in connection with the Nuremberg trials after World War II, that is, when they dealt with the main war criminals of the Third Reich. Crimes against humanity are today regulated in section 7 of the International Criminal Code. The three major questions to be answered in the context of a judicial approach to the corona scandal are:
- Is there a corona pandemic or is there only a PCR-test pandemic? Specifically, does a positive PCR-test result mean that the person tested is infected with Covid-19, or does it mean absolutely nothing in connection with the Covid-19 infection?
- Do the so-called anti-corona measures, such as the lockdown, mandatory face masks, social distancing, and quarantine regulations, serve to protect the worlds population from corona, or do these measures serve only to make people panic so that they believe without asking any questions that their lives are in danger, so that in the end the pharmaceutical and tech industries can generate huge profits from the sale of PCR tests, antigen and antibody tests and vaccines, as well as the harvesting of our genetic fingerprints?
- Is it true that the German government was massively lobbied, more so than any other country, by the chief protagonists of this so-called corona pandemic, Mr. Drosten, virologist at charity hospital in Berlin; Mr. Wieler, veterinarian and head of the German equivalent of the CDC, the RKI; and Mr. Tedros, Head of the World Health Organization or WHO; because Germany is known as a particularly disciplined country and was therefore to become a role model for the rest of the world for its strict and, of course, successful adherence to the corona measures?
Answers to these three questions are urgently needed because the allegedly new and highly dangerous coronavirus has not caused any excess mortality anywhere in the world, and certainly not here in Germany. But the anti-corona measures, whose only basis are the PCR-test results, which are in turn all based on the German Drosten test, have, in the meantime, caused the loss of innumerable human lives and have destroyed the economic existence of countless companies and individuals worldwide. In Australia, for example, people are thrown into prison if they do not wear a mask or do not wear it properly, as deemed by the authorities. In the Philippines, people who do not wear a mask or do not wear it properly, in this sense, are getting shot in the head.
Let me first give you a summary of the facts as they present themselves today. The most important thing in a lawsuit is to establish the facts that is, to find out what actually happened. That is because the application of the law always depends on the facts at issue. If I want to prosecute someone for fraud, I cannot do that by presenting the facts of a car accident. So what happened here regarding the alleged corona pandemic?
The facts laid out below are, to a large extent, the result of the work of the Corona Investigative Committee. This Committee was founded on July 10, 2020 by four lawyers in order to determine, through hearing expert testimony of international scientists and other experts:
- How dangerous is the virus really?
- What is the significance of a positive PCR test?
- What collateral damage has been caused by the corona measures, both with respect to the world populations health, and with respect to the worlds economy?
Let me start with a little bit of background information. What happened in May 2019 and then in early 2020? And what happened 12 years earlier with the swine flu, which many of you may have forgotten about? In May 2019, the stronger of the two parties which govern Germany in a grand coalition, the CDU, held a Congress on Global Health, apparently at the instigation of important players from the pharmaceutical industry and the tech industry. At this Congress, the usual suspects, you might say, gave their speeches. Angela Merkel was there, and the German Secretary of Health, Jens Spahn. But, some other people, whom one would not necessarily expect to be present at such a gathering, were also there: Professor Drosten, virologist from the Charite hospital in Berlin; Professor Wieler, veterinarian and Head of the RKI, the German equivalent of the CDC; as well as Mr. Tedros, philosopher and Head of the World Health Organization (WHO). They all gave speeches there. Also present and giving speeches were the chief lobbyists of the worlds two largest health funds, namely the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the Wellcome Trust. Less than a year later, these very people called the shots in the proclamation of the worldwide corona pandemic, made sure that mass PCR tests were used to prove mass infections with Covid-19 all over the world, and are now pushing for vaccines to be invented and sold worldwide.
These infections, or rather the positive test results that the PCR tests delivered, in turn became the justification for worldwide lockdowns, social distancing and mandatory face masks. It is important to note at this point that the definition of a pandemic was changed 12 years earlier. Until then, a pandemic was considered to be a disease that spread worldwide and which led to many serious illnesses and deaths. Suddenly, and for reasons never explained, it was supposed to be a worldwide disease only. Many serious illnesses and many deaths were not required any more to announce a pandemic. Due to this change, the WHO, which is closely intertwined with the global pharmaceutical industry, was able to declare the swine flu pandemic in 2009, with the result that vaccines were produced and sold worldwide on the basis of contracts that have been kept secret until today.
These vaccines proved to be completely unnecessary because the swine flu eventually turned out to be a mild flu, and never became the horrific plague that the pharmaceutical industry and its affiliated universities kept announcing it would turn into, with millions of deaths certain to happen if people didnt get vaccinated. These vaccines also led to serious health problems. About 700 children in Europe fell incurably ill with narcolepsy and are now forever severely disabled. The vaccines bought with millions of taxpayers money had to be destroyed with even more taxpayers money. Already then, during the swine flu, the German virologist Drosten was one of those who stirred up panic in the population, repeating over and over again that the swine flu would claim many hundreds of thousands, even millions of deaths all over the world. In the end, it was mainly thanks to Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg and his efforts as a member of the German Bundestag, and also a member of the Council of Europe, that this hoax was brought to an end before it would lead to even more serious consequences.
Fast forward to March of 2020, when the German Bundestag announced an Epidemic Situation of National Importance, which is the German equivalent of a pandemic in March of 2020 and, based on this, the lockdown with the suspension of all essential constitutional rights for an unforeseeable time, there was only one single opinion on which the Federal Government in Germany based its decision. In an outrageous violation of the universally accepted principle audiatur et altera pars, which means that one must also hear the other side, the only person they listened to was Mr. Drosten.
That is the very person whose horrific, panic-inducing prognoses had proved to be catastrophically false 12 years earlier. We know this because a whistleblower named David Sieber, a member of the Green Party, told us about it. He did so first on August 29, 2020 in Berlin, in the context of an event at which Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. also took part, and at which both men gave speeches. And he did so afterwards in one of the sessions of our Corona Committee.
The reason he did this is that he had become increasingly sceptical about the official narrative propagated by politicians and the mainstream media. He had therefore undertaken an effort to find out about other scientists opinions and had found them on the Internet. There, he realized that there were a number of highly renowned scientists who held a completely different opinion, which contradicted the horrific prognoses of Mr. Drosten. They assumed and still do assume that there was no disease that went beyond the gravity of the seasonal flu, that the population had already acquired cross- or T-cell immunity against this allegedly new virus, and that there was therefore no reason for any special measures, and certainly not for vaccinations.
These scientists include Professor John Ioannidis of Stanford University in California, a specialist in statistics and epidemiology, as well as public health, and at the same time the most quoted scientist in the world; Professor Michael Levitt, Nobel prize-winner for chemistry and also a biophysicist at Stanford University; the German professors Kary Mölling, Sucharit Bhakti, Klud Wittkowski, as well as Stefan Homburg; and now many, many more scientists and doctors worldwide, including Dr. Mike Yeadon. Dr. Mike Yeadon is the former Vice-President and Scientific Director of Pfizer, one of the largest pharmaceutical companies in the world. I will talk some more about him a little later.
At the end of March, beginning of April of 2020, Mr. Sieber turned to the leadership of his Green Party with the knowledge he had accumulated, and suggested that they present these other scientific opinions to the public and explain that, contrary to Mr. Drostens doomsday prophecies, there was no reason for the public to panic. Incidentally, Lord Sumption, who served as a judge at the British supreme court from 2012 to 2018, had done the very same thing at the very same time and had come to the very same conclusion: that there was no factual basis for panic and no legal basis for the corona measures. Likewise, the former President of the German federal constitutional court expressed albeit more cautiously serious doubts that the corona measures were constitutional. But instead of taking note of these other opinions and discussing them with David Sieber, the Green Party leadership declared that Mr. Drostens panic messages were good enough for the Green Party. Remember, theyre not a member of the ruling coalition; theyre the opposition. Still, that was enough for them, just as it had been good enough for the Federal Government as a basis for its lockdown decision, they said. They subsequently, the Green Party leadership called David Sieber a conspiracy theorist, without ever having considered the content of his information, and then stripped him of his mandates.
Now lets take a look at the current actual situation regarding the viruss danger, the complete uselessness of PCR tests for the detection of infections, and the lockdowns based on non-existent infections. In the meantime, we know that the health care systems were never in danger of becoming overwhelmed by Covid-19. On the contrary, many hospitals remain empty to this day and some are now facing bankruptcy. The hospital ship Comfort, which anchored in New York at the time, and could have accommodated a thousand patients, never accommodated more than some 20 patients. Nowhere was there any excess mortality. Studies carried out by Professor Ioannidis and others have shown that the mortality of corona is equivalent to that of the seasonal flu. Even the pictures from Bergamo and New York that were used to demonstrate to the world that panic was in order proved to be deliberately misleading.
Then, the so-called Panic Paper was leaked, which was written by the German Department of the Interior. Its classified content shows beyond a shadow of a doubt that, in fact, the population was deliberately driven to panic by politicians and mainstream media. The accompanying irresponsible statements of the Head of the RKI remember the [German] CDC Mr. Wieler, who repeatedly and excitedly announced that the corona measures must be followed unconditionally by the population without them asking any question, shows that that he followed the script verbatim. In his public statements, he kept announcing that the situation was very grave and threatening, although the figures compiled by his own Institute proved the exact opposite.
Among other things, the Panic Paper calls for children to be made to feel responsible and I quote for the painful tortured death of their parents and grandparents if they do not follow the corona rules, that is, if they do not wash their hands constantly and dont stay away from their grandparents. A word of clarification: in Bergamo, the vast majority of deaths, 94% to be exact, turned out to be the result not of Covid-19, but rather the consequence of the government deciding to transfer sick patients, sick with probably the cold or seasonal flu, from hospitals to nursing homes in order to make room at the hospitals for all the Covid patients, who ultimately never arrived. There, at the nursing homes, they then infected old people with a severely weakened immune system, usually as a result of pre-existing medical conditions. In addition, a flu vaccination, which had previously been administered, had further weakened the immune systems of the people in the nursing homes. In New York, only some, but by far not all hospitals were overwhelmed. Many people, most of whom were again elderly and had serious pre-existing medical conditions, and most of whom, had it not been for the panic-mongering, would have just stayed at home to recover, raced to the hospitals. There, many of them fell victim to healthcare-associated infections (or nosocomial infections) on the one hand, and incidents of malpractice on the other hand, for example, by being put on a respirator rather than receiving oxygen through an oxygen mask. Again, to clarify: Covid-19, this is the current state of affairs, is a dangerous disease, just like the seasonal flu is a dangerous disease. And of course, Covid-19, just like the seasonal flu, may sometimes take a severe clinical course and will sometimes kill patients.
However, as autopsies have shown, which were carried out in Germany in particular, by the forensic scientist Professor Klaus Püschel in Hamburg, the fatalities he examined had almost all been caused by serious pre-existing conditions, and almost all of the people who had died at the very at a very old age, just like in Italy, meaning they had lived beyond their average life expectancy.
In this context, the following should also be mentioned: the German RKI that is, again the equivalent of the CDC had initially, strangely enough, recommended that no autopsies be performed. And there are numerous credible reports that doctors and hospitals worldwide had been paid money for declaring a deceased person a victim of Covid-19 rather than writing down the true cause of death on the death certificate, for example a heart attack or a gunshot wound. Without the autopsies, we would never know that the overwhelming majority of the alleged Covid-19 victims had died of completely different diseases, but not of Covid-19. The assertion that the lockdown was necessary because there were so many different infections with SARS-COV-2, and because the healthcare systems would be overwhelmed is wrong for three reasons, as we have learned from the hearings we conducted with the Corona Committee, and from other data that has become available in the meantime:
A. The lockdown was imposed when the virus was already retreating. By the time the lockdown was imposed, the alleged infection rates were already dropping again.
B. Theres already protection from the virus because of cross- or T-cell immunity. Apart from the above mentioned lockdown being imposed when the infection rates were already dropping, there is also cross- or T-cell immunity in the general population against the corona viruses contained in every flu or influenza wave. This is true, even if this time around, a slightly different strain of the coronavirus was at work. And that is because the bodys own immune system remembers every virus it has ever battled in the past, and from this experience, it also recognizes a supposedly new, but still similar, strain of the virus from the corona family. Incidentally, thats how the PCR test for the detection of an infection was invented by now infamous Professor Drosten.
At the beginning of January of 2020, based on this very basic knowledge, Mr. Drosten developed his PCR test, which supposedly detects an infection with SARS-COV-2, without ever having seen the real Wuhan virus from China, only having learned from social media reports that there was something going on in Wuhan, he started tinkering on his computer with what would become his corona PCR test. For this, he used an old SARS virus, hoping it would be sufficiently similar to the allegedly new strain of the coronavirus found in Wuhan. Then, he sent the result of his computer tinkering to China to determine whether the victims of the alleged new coronavirus tested positive. They did.
And that was enough for the World Health Organization to sound the pandemic alarm and to recommend the worldwide use of the Drosten PCR test for the detection of infections with the virus now called SARS-COV-2. Drostens opinion and advice was this must be emphasized once again the only source for the German government when it announced the lockdown as well as the rules for social distancing and the mandatory wearing of masks. And this must also be emphasized once again Germany apparently became the center of especially massive lobbying by the pharmaceutical and tech industry because the world, with reference to the allegedly disciplined Germans, should do as the Germans do in order to survive the pandemic.
C. And this is the most important part of our fact-finding: the PCR test is being used on the basis of false statements, NOT based on scientific facts with respect to infections. In the meantime, we have learned that these PCR tests, contrary to the assertions of Messrs. Drosten, Wieler and the WHO, do NOT give any indication of an infection with any virus, let alone an infection with SARS-COV-2. Not only are PCR tests expressly not approved for diagnostic purposes, as is correctly noted on leaflets coming with these tests, and as the inventor of the PCR test, Kary Mullis, has repeatedly emphasized. Instead, theyre simply incapable of diagnosing any disease. That is: contrary to the assertions of Drosten, Wieler and the WHO, which they have been making since the proclamation of the pandemic, a positive PCR-test result does not mean that an infection is present. If someone tests positive, it does NOT mean that theyre infected with anything, let alone with the contagious SARS-COV-2 virus.
Even the United States CDC, even this institution agrees with this, and I quote directly from page 38 of one of its publications on the coronavirus and the PCR tests, dated July 13, 2020. First bullet point says:
Detection of viral RNA may not indicate the presence of infectious virus or that 2019 nCOV [novel coronavirus] is the causative agent for clinical symptoms.
Second bullet point says:
The performance of this test has not been established for monitoring treatment of 2019 nCOV infection. Third bullet point says: This test cannot rule out diseases caused by other bacterial or viral pathogens.
It is still not clear whether there has ever been a scientifically correct isolation of the Wuhan virus, so that nobody knows exactly what were looking for when we test, especially since this virus, just like the flu viruses, mutates quickly. The PCR swabs take one or two sequences of a molecule that are invisible to the human eye and therefore need to be amplified in many cycles to make it visible. Everything over 35 cycles is as reported by the New York Times and others considered completely unreliable and scientifically unjustifiable. However, the Drosten test, as well as the WHO-recommended tests that followed his example, are set to 45 cycles. Can that be because of the desire to produce as many positive results as possible and thereby provide the basis for the false assumption that a large number of infections have been detected?
The test cannot distinguish inactive and reproductive matter. That means that a positive result may happen because the test detects, for example, a piece of debris, a fragment of a molecule, which may signal nothing else than that the immune system of the person tested won a battle with a common cold in the past. Even Drosten himself declared in an interview with a German business magazine in 2014, at that time concerning the alleged detection of an infection with the MERS virus, allegedly with the help of the PCR test, that these PCR tests are so highly sensitive that even very healthy and non-infectious people may test positive. At that time, he also became very much aware of the powerful role of a panic and fear-mongering media, as youll see at the end of the following quote. He said then, in this interview: If, for example, such a pathogen scurries over the nasal mucosa of a nurse for a day or so without her getting sick or noticing anything, then shes suddenly a MERS case. This could also explain the explosion of case numbers in Saudi Arabia. In addition, the media there have made this into an incredible sensation.
Has he forgotten this? Or is he deliberately concealing this in the corona context because corona is a very lucrative business opportunity for the pharmaceutical industry as a whole? And for Mr. Alford Lund, his co-author in many studies and also a PCR-test producer. In my view, it is completely implausible that he forgot in 2020 what he knew about the PCR tests and told the business magazine in 2014.
In short, this test cannot detect any infection, contrary to all false claims stating that it can. An infection, a so-called hot infection, requires that the virus, or rather a fragment of a molecule which may be a virus, is not just found somewhere, for example, in the throat of a person without causing any damage that would be a cold infection. Rather, a hot infection requires that the virus penetrates into the cells, replicates there and causes symptoms such as headaches or a sore throat. Only then is a person really infected in the sense of a hot infection, because only then is a person contagious, that is, able to infect others. Until then, it is completely harmless for both the host and all other people that the host comes into contact with.
Once again, this means that positive test results, contrary to all other claims by Drosten, Wieler, or the WHO, mean nothing with respect to infections, as even the CDC knows, as quoted above.
Meanwhile, a number of highly respected scientists worldwide assume that there has never been a corona pandemic, but only a PCR-test pandemic. This is the conclusion reached by many German scientists, such as professors Bhakti, Reiss, Mölling, Hockertz, Walach and many others, including the above-mentioned Professor John Ioannidis, and the Nobel laureate, Professor Michael Levitt from Stanford University.
The most recent such opinion is that of the aforementioned Dr. Mike Yeadon, a former Vice-President and Chief Science Officer at Pfizer, who held this position for 16 years. He and his co-authors, all well-known scientists, published a scientific paper in September of 2020 and he wrote a corresponding magazine article on September 20, 2020. Among other things, he and they state and I quote:
Were basing our government policy, our economic policy, and the policy of restricting fundamental rights, presumably on completely wrong data and assumptions about the coronavirus. If it werent for the test results that are constantly reported in the media, the pandemic would be over because nothing really happened. Of course, there are some serious individual cases of illness, but there are also some in every flu epidemic. There was a real wave of disease in March and April, but since then, everything has gone back to normal. Only the positive results rise and sink wildly again and again, depending on how many tests are carried out. But the real cases of illnesses are over. There can be no talk of a second wave. The allegedly new strain of the coronavirus is
Dr. Yeadon continues
only new in that it is a new type of the long-known corona virus. There are at least four coronaviruses that are endemic and cause some of the common colds we experience, especially in winter. They all have a striking sequence similarity to the coronavirus, and because the human immune system recognizes the similarity to the virus that has now allegedly been newly discovered, a T-cell immunity has long existed in this respect. 30 per cent of the population had this before the allegedly new virus even appeared. Therefore, it is sufficient for the so-called herd immunity that 15 to 25 per cent of the population are infected with the allegedly new coronavirus to stop the further spread of the virus. And this has long been the case.
Regarding the all-important PCR tests, Yeadon writes, in a piece called Lies, Damned Lies and Health Statistics: The Deadly Danger of False Positives, dated September 20, 2020, and I quote
The likelihood of an apparently positive case being a false positive is between 89 to 94 per cent, or near certainty.
Dr. Yeadon, in agreement with the professors of immunology Kamera from Germany, Kappel from the Netherlands, and Cahill from Ireland, as well as the microbiologist Dr. Arve from Austria, all of whom testified before the German Corona Committee, explicitly points out that a positive test does not mean that an intact virus has been found.
The authors explain that what the PCR test actually measures is and I quote:
Simply the presence of partial RNA sequences present in the intact virus, which could be a piece of dead virus, which cannot make the subject sick, and cannot be transmitted, and cannot make anyone else sick.
Because of the complete unsuitability of the test for the detection of infectious diseases tested positive in goats, sheep, papayas and even chicken wings Oxford Professor Carl Heneghan, Director of the Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, writes that the Covid virus would never disappear if this test practice were to be continued, but would always be falsely detected in much of what is tested. Lockdowns, as Yeadon and his colleagues found out, do not work. Sweden, with its laissez-faire approach, and Great Britain, with its strict lockdown, for example, have completely comparable disease and mortality statistics. The same was found by US scientists concerning the different US states. It makes no difference to the incidence of disease whether a state implements a lockdown or not.
With regard to the now infamous Imperial College of Londons Professor Neil Ferguson and his completely false computer models warning of millions of deaths, he says that and I quote: No serious scientist gives any validity to Fergusons model. He points out with thinly veiled contempt again I quote:
Its important that you know, most scientists dont accept that it that is, Fergusons model was even faintly right. But the government is still wedded to the model. Ferguson predicted 40 thousand corona deaths in Sweden by May and 100 thousand by June, but it remained at 5,800 which, according to the Swedish authorities, is equivalent to a mild flu. If the PCR tests had not been used as a diagnostic tool for corona infections, there would not be a pandemic and there would be no lockdowns, but everything would have been perceived as just a medium or light wave of influenza, these scientists conclude. Dr. Yeadon in his piece, Lies, Damned Lies and Health Statistics: The Deadly Danger of False Positives, writes: This test is fatally flawed and must immediately be withdrawn and never used again in this setting, unless shown to be fixed. And, towards the end of that article, I have explained how a hopelessly performing diagnostic test has been, and continues to be used, not for diagnosis of disease, but it seems solely to create fear.
Now lets take a look at the current actual situation regarding the severe damage caused by the lockdowns and other measures. Another detailed paper, written by a German official in the Department of the Interior, who is responsible for risk assessment and the protection of the population against risks, was leaked recently. It is now called the False Alarm paper. This paper comes to the conclusion that there was that there was and is no sufficient evidence for serious health risks for the population as claimed by Drosten, Wieler and the WHO, but the author says theres very much evidence of the corona measures causing gigantic health and economic damage to the population, which he then describes in detail in this paper. This, he concludes, will lead to very high claims for damages, which the government will be held responsible for. This has now become reality, but the papers author was suspended.
More and more scientists, but also lawyers, recognize that, as a result of the deliberate panic-mongering, and the corona measures enabled by this panic, democracy is in great danger of being replaced by fascist totalitarian models. As I already mentioned above, in Australia, people who do not wear the masks, which more and more studies show, are hazardous to health, or who allegedly do not wear them correctly, are arrested, handcuffed and thrown into jail. In the Philippines, they run the risk of getting shot, but even in Germany and in other previously civilized countries, children are taken away from their parents if they do not comply with quarantine regulations, distance regulations, and mask-wearing regulations. According to psychologists and psychotherapists who testified before the Corona Committee, children are traumatized en masse, with the worst psychological consequences yet to be expected in the medium- and long-term. In Germany alone, to bankruptcies are expected in the fall to strike small- and medium-sized businesses, which form the backbone of the economy. This will result in incalculable tax losses and incalculably high and long-term social security money transfers for among other things unemployment benefits.
Since, in the meantime, pretty much everybody is beginning to understand the full devastating impact of the completely unfounded corona measures, I will refrain from detailing this any further.
Let me now give you a summary of the legal consequences. The most difficult part of a lawyers work is always to establish the true facts, not the application of the legal rules to these facts. Unfortunately, a German lawyer does not learn this at law school but his Anglo-American counterparts do get the necessary training for this at their law schools. And probably for this reason, but also because of the much more pronounced independence of the Anglo-American judiciary, the Anglo-American law of evidence is much more effective in practice than the German one. A court of law can only decide a legal dispute correctly if it has previously determined the facts correctly, which is not possible without looking at all the evidence. And thats why the law of evidence is so important. On the basis of the facts summarized above, in particular those established with the help of the work of the German Corona Committee, the legal evaluation is actually simple. It is simple for all civilized legal systems, regardless of whether these legal systems are based on civil law, which follows the Roman law more closely, or whether they are based on Anglo-American common law, which is only loosely connected to Roman law.
Lets first take a look at the unconstitutionality of the measures. A number of German law professors, including professors Kingreen, Morswig, Jungbluth and Vosgerau have stated, either in written expert opinions or in interviews, in line with the serious doubts expressed by the former president of the federal constitutional court with respect to the constitutionality of the corona measures, that these measures the corona measures are without a sufficient factual basis, and also without a sufficient legal basis, and are therefore unconstitutional and must be repealed immediately. Very recently, a judge, Thorsten Schleif is his name, declared publicly that the German judiciary, just like the general public, has been so panic-stricken that it was no longer able to administer justice properly. He says that the courts of law and I quote have all too quickly waved through coercive measures which, for millions of people all over Germany, represent massive suspensions of their constitutional rights. He points out that German citizens again I quote are currently experiencing the most serious encroachment on their constitutional rights since the founding of the federal republic of Germany in 1949. In order to contain the corona pandemic, federal and state governments have intervened, he says, massively, and in part threatening the very existence of the country as it is guaranteed by the constitutional rights of the people.
What about fraud, intentional infliction of damage and crimes against humanity?
Based on the rules of criminal law, asserting false facts concerning the PCR tests or intentional misrepresentation, as it was committed by Messrs. Drosten, Wieler and WHO, as well as the WHO, can only be assessed as fraud. Based on the rules of civil tort law, this translates into intentional infliction of damage. The German professor of civil law, Martin Schwab, supports this finding in public interviews. In a comprehensive legal opinion of around 180 pages, he has familiarized himself with the subject matter like no other legal scholar has done thus far and, in particular, has provided a detailed account of the complete failure of the mainstream media to report on the true facts of this so-called pandemic. Messrs. Drosten, Wieler and Tedros of the WHO all knew, based on their own expertise or the expertise of their institutions, that the PCR tests cannot provide any information about infections, but asserted over and over again to the general public that they can, with their counterparts all over the world repeating this. And they all knew and accepted that, on the basis of their recommendations, the governments of the world would decide on lockdowns, the rules for social distancing, and mandatory wearing of masks, the latter representing a very serious health hazard, as more and more independent studies and expert statements show. Under the rules of civil tort law, all those who have been harmed by these PCR-test-induced lockdowns are entitled to receive full compensation for their losses. In particular, there is a duty to compensate that is, a duty to pay damages for the loss of profits suffered by companies and self-employed employed persons as a result of the lockdown and other measures.
In the meantime, however, the anti-corona measures have caused, and continue to cause, such devastating damage to the world populations health and economy that the crimes committed by Messrs. Drosten, Wieler and the WHO must be legally qualified as actual crimes against humanity, as defined in section 7 of the International Criminal Code.
How can we do something? What can we do? Well, the class action is the best route to compensatory damages and to political consequences. The so-called class action lawsuit is based on English law and exists today in the USA and in Canada. It enables a court of law to allow a complaint for damages to be tried as a class action lawsuit at the request of a plaintiff if:
- As a result of a damage-inducing event
- A large number of people suffer the same type of damage.
Phrased differently, a judge can allow a class-action lawsuit to go forward if common questions of law and fact make up the vital component of the lawsuit. Here, the common questions of law and fact revolve around the worldwide PCR-test-based lockdowns and its consequences. Just like the VW diesel passenger cars were functioning products, but they were defective due to a so-called defeat device because they didnt comply with the emissions standards, so too the PCR tests which are perfectly good products in other settings are defective products when it comes to the diagnosis of infections. Now, if an American or Canadian company or an American or Canadian individual decides to sue these persons in the United States or Canada for damages, then the court called upon to resolve this dispute may, upon request, allow this complaint to be tried as a class action lawsuit.
If this happens, all affected parties worldwide will be informed about this through publications in the mainstream media and will thus have the opportunity to join this class action within a certain period of time, to be determined by the court. It should be emphasized that nobody must join the class action, but every injured party can join the class.
The advantage of the class action is that only one trial is needed, namely to try the complaint of a representative plaintiff who is affected in a manner typical of everyone else in the class. This is, firstly, cheaper, and secondly, faster than hundreds of thousands or more individual lawsuits. And thirdly, it imposes less of a burden on the courts. Fourthly, as a rule it allows a much more precise examination of the accusations than would be possible in the context of hundreds of thousands, or more likely in this corona setting, even millions of individual lawsuits.
In particular, the well-established and proven Anglo-American law of evidence, with its pre-trial discovery, is applicable. This requires that all evidence relevant for the determination of the lawsuit is put on the table. In contrast to the typical situation in German lawsuits with structural imbalance, that is, lawsuits involving on the one hand a consumer, and on the other hand a powerful corporation, the withholding or even destruction of evidence is not without consequence; rather the party withholding or even destroying evidence loses the case under these evidence rules.
Here in Germany, a group of tort lawyers have banded together to help their clients with recovery of damages. They have provided all relevant information and forms for German plaintiffs to both estimate how much damage they have suffered and join the group or class of plaintiffs who will later join the class action when it goes forward either in Canada or the US. Initially, this group of lawyers had considered to also collect and manage the claims for damages of other, non-German plaintiffs, but this proved to be unmanageable.
However, through an international lawyers network, which is growing larger by the day, the German group of attorneys provides to all of their colleagues in all other countries, free of charge, all relevant information, including expert opinions and testimonies of experts showing that the PCR tests cannot detect infections. And they also provide them with all relevant information as to how they can prepare and bundle the claims for damages of their clients so that, they too, can assert their clients claims for damages, either in their home countrys courts of law, or within the framework of the class action, as explained above.
These scandalous corona facts, gathered mostly by the Corona Committee and summarized above, are the very same facts that will soon be proven to be true either in one court of law, or in many courts of law all over the world.
These are the facts that will pull the masks off the faces of all those responsible for these crimes. To the politicians who believe those corrupt people, these facts are hereby offered as a lifeline that can help you readjust your course of action, and start the long overdue public scientific discussion, and not go down with those charlatans and criminals.
Thank you.
Video Reference:
___
https://alachuachronicle.com/video-and-transcript-crimes-against-humanity/
Bloggar | Breytt s.d. kl. 22:27 | Slóð | Facebook | Athugasemdir (1)
A Monetary System for the New Millennium
by Roger Langrick
http://www.worldtrans.org/whole/monetarysystem.html
The Debt Engine is a phrase to describe unrelenting, forever increasing private and government debt. The need to stay ahead of escalating debt fuels practically everything we do; it forces us out of bed in the morning to go to jobs that most of us despise. Corporations make all their decisions around first how to service their snowballing debt, and secondly around profit. Governments spend all their time worrying about how to meet their social agendas while at the same time service the increasing debt load of deficit spending.
As a motivating force, the Debt Engine now exceeds all others in the insane dash of the planet towards self destruction. Universal unrepayable debt creates a social environment in which certain types of behavior flourish and inhibits or destroys any tendency towards long term concerns and nourishment.
Unrepayable Debt is different than the everyday debt of normal life. Unrepayable Debt is an actual built in flaw of our present monetary system: The Fractional Reserve System. It benefits no-one except those intimately connected with the banking industry and in spite of its devastating repercussions, it is a flaw that can be fixed.
Everyone has some ideas about money, who controls it, where it comes from and how it operates. Some say the government prints it; others say hard work makes money, while others would guess that it's something to do with gold. They might also picture it as a vast pile with everyone competing for as much as they can get. Bankers sometimes inflame our passions by claiming that the government has grabbed all the money and there is none left for private industry.
It's all poppycock. Our money supply isn't created by the government; a brilliant idea doesn't make money and neither does hard work (unless you happen to be in the counterfeiting business.) Our money is a national accounting system of who owes what to whom, and it is a system that is owned and operated by the private banking industry.
There is no such thing as a static heap of money created by hard work and business cunning. Money flicks in and out of existence as credit and debit balances; the money supply swells and contracts continuously as loans are created and then destroyed. Money is simply a bookkeeping system; a man created device.
The man who invented the monetary system which we use today was a Scotsman, John Law, who lived during the 18th. century. He invented a new type of money to replace the old one of specie (the use of coins). In doing so he created the mechanism to finance the industrial revolution, and ultimately our modern technological world.
Much has been made of the astounding inventions of that era but what is often forgotten is that most of them would have never have seen the light of day without John Law and his invention: the Fractional Reserve Money System. Without it, there would have been no railroads, no Nissans or G.M.'s, nor would there have been any super highways to drive them on. There would have been no space shuttle, no Love Canal, no drift net fishing, no heart transplants and no Cruise missiles.
What John Law did with his invention of a new money system was enable the Industrial Revolution, with all of its good and bad aspects, to take place. Without him, the Revolution would have fizzled and died and with it, our technological world.
Here was the problem which John Law solved. In the early 1700's the newly industrializing nations of the world were in a perpetual state of economic crisis because their coinage system of money could not keep up with demand. Governments tried everything to increase the money supply. One trick was to make new coins much smaller than the old thereby getting more per ounce, but it was a stop gap measure at best.
To grasp the magnitude of the problem, try to imagine building just one modern skyscraper using only gold coins as finance. The industrialists of the Industrial Revolution were faced with a similar problem; how to build their factories, mills and railroads using only scarce gold coins.
John Law's solution was to create a national paper money supply; banknotes that would be officially recognized as "real money". The advantages were obvious. Paper money could be expanded indefinitely and was much cheaper than specie to make. To get and keep initial public confidence, Law suggested a fraction of gold be always kept on hand for the few people who wanted to redeem their notes.
Through a process of trial and error it was found that specie could support about ten times its value in paper money. That is, a bank which held $10 in gold could safely print and loan out about $100 in paper money. The gold held in reserve was obviously a mere fraction of the banknotes which it supported and so the system became known as the Fractional Reserve System. The private banking industry was chartered by government to create the new money supply of paper notes. Until earlier in this century, banks literally printed their own supply against their own gold reserves with their name on each note, and lent them out to the public and government. Now the federal government has taken on the printing job but the notes are still drawn on private banks.
In the 1930's the convertibility of bank notes was dropped but the Fractional Reserve System is alive and well today, albeit in a more sophisticated form. Cheques or credit cards have largely replaced paper money but the principle remains the same; the banking industry creates the money which government and society then borrows.
John Law's method of money creation is still the dynamo that powers our present world. By replacing specie with a simple national accounting system of credit and debit, he made money infinitely more flexible, able to be contracted or expanded to meet any situation.
However, using the Fractional Reserve System has not been a universally happy experience. It has a built in mechanical flaw that always keeps total national and private debt ahead of the money available to repay it. In fact the more a nation expands, the more it automatically goes into debt to the system over and above the money that it borrows.
To explain, imagine the first bank which prints and lends out $100. For its efforts it asks for the borrower to return $110 in one year; that is it asks for 10% interest. Unwittingly, or maybe wittingly, the bank has created a mathematically impossible situation. The only way in which the borrower can return 110 of the bank's notes is if the bank prints, and lends, $10 more...at 10% interest.
When presented with this scenario, there is often a tendency to think :"Ah, but the borrower can always make the extra $10 somewhere else, through hard work or a deal overseas." However, although we frequently inter change the two sayings, earning money is not the same as making it. Earnings are simply a transfer of money from on ownership to another and neither increase nor decrease the total money in existence. Making money actually does increase the nation's money supply but no-one can do that but the banking industry itself as laid down in its charter from the federal government.
The result of creating 100 and demanding 110 in return, is that the collective borrowers of a nation are forever chasing a phantom which can never be caught; the mythical $10 that were never created. The debt in fact is unrepayable. Each time $100 is created for the nation, the nation's overall indebtedness to the system is increased by $110.
The only solution at present is increased borrowing to cover the principle plus the interest of what has been borrowed. The business or government that cannot expand its borrowing every year is seized by its increasing debt load and dragged under.
Many economists are not unmindful of the problem but pass it off as irrelevant. They say that if the marketplace economy keeps expanding, thereby fuelling an increase in the total money supply, there is no problem with meeting interest payments on an increasing debt load. But under such circumstances, economic expansion is not a luxury but an imperative to stay ahead.
In John Law's day, the need to continuously expand to meet growing debt repayments was seen as a minor problem of no consequence. Today however we all know the planet cannot sustain unlimited growth. Even so, we are stuck with a monetary system that demands continuous expansion or face the chaos of total economic collapse.
The consequences of the Debt Engine are everywhere. Political and business leaders are sacrificing the planet to stay ahead of bankruptcy. Technology is not being used to create a sane and sustainable lifestyle for us all but is being channeled into the most narrow band of activity: the market place activity of "making" money. Just as governments are forced into ignoring vital social and environmental questions in their efforts to balance the books, so many corporations are putting to one side such things as resource depletion and the destruction of the ecosystem in their frantic efforts to remain economically alive.
But the situation is not completely bleak. Just as John Law found a way around the impasse of coinage, so there are solutions for the problem of unrepayable debt. Obviously the first thing to do is make sure that the ratio of credit to debt is always the same. Under the Fractional Reserve System, $100 credit is created and $110 debt is demanded in return; that is, there is always more debt than credit. This equation should be $100 credit equals $100 debt.
The mechanics of how to achieve this were proposed over one hundred and fifty years ago. It was proposed that the nation's money be created by two agencies: the banking industry and government.
????
Instead of taxes, government would be empowered to create money for its own expenses up to the balance the debt shortfall. Thus, if the banking industry created $100 in a year, the government would create $10 which it would use for its own expenses. Abraham Lincoln used this successfully when he created $500 million of "greenbacks" to fight the Civil War.
A government which creates its own money supply becomes independent and the most important result of freeing government from its present debtor relationship to the banking industry would be to make it more able to respond to social pressures for reform. A financially independent government would be able to pursue long term agendas for the betterment of society. For instance, a twin source of money creation could not only rapidly reduce taxes, but create additional funding for other initiatives. A government having the same right of issue as is now monopolized by the banking industry could fund vital job creating initiatives such as environmental repair and sustainable technology on a scale that is hard to imagine.
America has the resources to lead the world into a sustainable future. But it needs a monetary system which will allow for its resources to be mobilized towards a greater destiny than marketplace superiority. Such a new monetary system with all of its potential would require a dramatic upgrading of society's consciousness and understanding of money. We have to move from a simplistic belief in money having an intrinsic value of its own and see it as a bookkeeping system of the real wealth of our nations. Ultimately our money is not dependent on gold in Fort Knox but on the human and natural resources which it represents.
The world has passed beyond an age of scarcity and the challenge of the new era is not about solving problems of want, but dealing with abundance and how to use it to create a sustainable future. Above all we need the visionaries able to point the way.
In my forthcoming book Superproduction I try to address the potential which is now in our grasp. With computerization, robotics, advances in genetics and food growing, we have the potential to turn the planet into a sustainable ecosystem capable of supporting all. We have the technology to genuinely contemplate colonizing the solar system.
This is not a time to be saddled with an 18th century money system designed around the endless rape of the planet. John Law enabled humanity to scrabble out of scarcity but now his system is antiquated. Philosophically it is based on the robber baron mentality and technically it is flawed with Unrepayable Debt. As such it is unable to respond either to the abundance which it created or the problems which it spawned.
The Debt Engine has distorted the potential of the Industrial Revolution and forced us into a narrow focus of marketplace ethic. A new monetary system with enough government control to ensure funding of vital issues could unlock the creative potential of the entire nation. By redirecting the focus of our national economy, a new monetary system would enable men and women who can think in terms of abundance not only for themselves but how also to use it for the benefit of the entire planet. I know John Law would approve.
Roger Langrick
963 Maple St. White Rock
B.C. Canada V4B4M4
(604) 531-1004
roger.langrick@dafbbs.com
000
Ég hafði minnt á þetta áður. Egilsstaðir, 06.01.2013 jg
Peningakerfið.
Nýta hvern einstakling, og nota náttúruauðlindir á þann máta,
að allt efni gangi í hring, og sé notað aftur og aftur.
Við höfum oft á undanförnum öldum, lent í miklum kreppum,
af því að það var skortur á peningum, til að greiða fólkinu fyrir vinnu,
til að framleiða vörurnar og síðan er fólkið neytendur sem kaupir vörur og þjónustu.
Þessi grein er mjög lærdómsrík.
Egilsstaðir, 06.01.2013 jg
Ég er að leita eftir leyfi til að kynna þessa grein, það kemur í ljós ef hún má vera hér áfram.
A Monetary System for the New Millennium
http://www.worldtrans.org/whole/monetarysystem.html
(I am trying to draw attention, highlight, for better learning jg)
by Roger Langrick
I did not dare to have the article here, I have not got the permission.
Egilsstaðir, 03.11.2020 Jónas Gunnlaugsson
Bloggar | Breytt s.d. kl. 23:28 | Slóð | Facebook | Athugasemdir (0)
Leita að veilum í fjöllunum
Leita að heitu vatni á öllu svæðinu
Flateyri, fólkið kom fyrir árhundruðum, skoðaði fjörðinn og allt umhverfið.
Hvar var hægt að taka sér bólfestu, hvar var besta skipalægið, hvar var best að draga bátana upp í skjól og til viðgerða?
Hvaðan var styst út á miðin? Allt miðaðist við tækni þeirra tíma.
Betra var að vera í skjóli fyrir norðan áttinni, og hafa sólina frá suðri þegar hún var hæst á lofti og þá sem mest af deginum.
Þegar þeir höfðu fundið þennan stað, þá tóku menn til hendinni og byggðu sér ból, á skriðunni sem kom úr giljunum í fjallinu, og hafði myndað skjól fyrir öldunni sem kom inn fjörðinn.
Svona gekk þetta í árana rás, byggt og búið, snjóflóðin eyddu öllu, jafnvel sáust lítil ummerki, eða engin.
Næsti hópur kom og kannaði aðstæður, og mat það á sama máta, eftir tækni möguleikum síns tíma.
000
Hvar hefðu þeir tekið sér bólfestu, ef þeir hefðu haft tæknina í dag?
Þá hefðu þeir ekki þurft að horfa til fjarlægðar á miðin, þeir hefu getað valið víðara svæði, þeir hefðu getað valið höfninni stað sem næst bygginga svæðinu eftir aðstæðum.
Einnig mætti keyra að höfninni og nota fjarmyndavéar.
Huga að sjávarflóðum, að öðru jöfnu, byggðin má vera tölvert yfir sjó.
Hvað gerum við nú, þegar við höfum getu til að greina verkefnið svo að við getum fundið bestu lausnina.
Ekki flana að neinu, gefa sér tíma til að hugsa.
Það eru byggingasvæðin, það er suðursólin, það er höfnin, það er ferðaþjónustan, það er vegir sem ekki eru á snjóflóðasvæði og þá í jarðgöngum, þá er auðveldara að leysa skólamálin og ferðaþjónustan verður öruggari og stöðugri.
Þetta kom upp í hugan, alltaf að hugsa, rannsaka og skoða vel það sem lengi skal standa.
Ný byggð gæti alltaf notast sem ferðaþjónusta og atvinnu vegur, fyrir þá sem verða vítt og breytt um landið sem nokkurskonar landvættir sem hafa eftirlit með landinu.
Hugsið ykkur fjölskyldurnar, sem gátu ekki valið bestu staðsetninguna yfir tíðina, en nú höfum við þekkinguna og getuna.
Hvað hefðu forfeðurnir og formæðurnar gert?
Svarið liggur í augum uppi.
Egilsstaðir, 18.01.2020 Jónas Gunnlaugsson
ATHUGASEMDIR
Áttu við að svarið sé Tenerife á veturna og Ísland á sumrin?
Eða kannski Alecante allt árið á bótunum syngjandi "ég er komin heim" í fjöldasöng landans með tárin í augunum?
Barnið tekur ástfóstri við heimahagann, þar sem það ólst upp, og eftir að hann hefur verið yfirgefinn mun heimahaginn aldrei þekkja það aftur.
Þess vegna sit t.d. ég við stofugluggann, bíð af mér veturinn, mæni á Snæfellið til að taka sólarhæðina og tel dagana til vors.
Í stað þess að taka þá upplýstu ákvörðun "þekkingar" tíðarandans að fara til Tene og þurfa þá ekki að óttast það að hálsbrotna á svellunum.
Magnús Sigurðsson, 18.1.2020 kl. 16:23
Er það fjörðurinn minn fagri, þar sem ég vel besta staðinn í firðinum mínum, til að horfa út um gluggann í því öryggi sem mannleg hugsun og bæn til Guðs míns getur skapað.
Við leitum þeirra lausna sem forfeður okkar þráðu, og nú eru þær í augsýn.
Fortíðin, nútíðin og framtíðin, eru þær allar í núinu? Flæðir á milli, eru þær allar til núna?
Getur nútíminn breytt fortíðinni? Ég held að svarið sé JÁ.
Við lifum í sýndar heimi, geislaskjá, sem Nikola Tesla talar um.
Ég sá að einhver var að boða á netinu, að nú væri hægt að sanna vísindalega að við lifðum í sýndar veröld.
000
You are a Simulation & Physics Can Prove It: George Smoot at TEDxSalford
Jónas Gunnlaugsson, 20.1.2020 kl. 22:51
Egilsstaðir, 02.11.2020 Jónas Gunnlaugsson
Geta ekki byggt vegna ofanflóðahættu | |
Tilkynna um óviðeigandi tengingu við frétt |
Bloggar | Breytt s.d. kl. 10:26 | Slóð | Facebook | Athugasemdir (0)
Bloggar | Breytt s.d. kl. 00:36 | Slóð | Facebook | Athugasemdir (0)
Leave a Reply
000
Egilsstaðir, 08.11.2020 Jónas Gunnlaugsson