Quebec reports record COVID cases, Ontario adds measures to LTC
John Madden, Hall of Fame coach and broadcaster, dies at 85
Dipali Roy couldn't afford to eat.
© Damian Dovarganes/AP A homeless person sleeps on a bench in downtown Los Angeles, Wednesday, Dec. 15, 2021. (AP Photo/Damian Dovarganes)She and her husband, Pradip Roy, were garment workers in Bangladesh when the Covid-19 pandemic hit last spring, leading to mass layoffs at their factory.
Like millions of people around the world, both lost their jobs in the capital city of Dhaka, where they had worked for years making pants, shirts and jackets. And like countless other migrants, they were forced to move home to the countryside to cut down on expenses.
© BRAC Dipali and Pradip Roy were pushed into poverty last year after the pandemic hit Bangladesh, leading to layoffs at their garment factory.The World Bank estimates that 97 million people across the globe fell into poverty due to the pandemic in 2020, living on less than $2 a day.
There has been little improvement since. "Globally, the increase in poverty that occurred in 2020 due to Covid still lingers, and the Covid-induced poor in 2021 continues to be 97 million people," economists at the World Bank said in a blog post earlier this year. They noted, however, that overall poverty should go down this year.
© BRAC Dipali and Pradip Roy were forced to move home to their village in Bangladesh last year to help cut down on expenses."We barely had enough to return home," Dipali Roy said in an interview in Bengali from the family's home, a corrugated metal shack in a village in northern Bangladesh.
As the couple looked for new ways to earn a living, they struggled to adjust. They tried to find a loan to start a small business, but at first no one was able or willing to help. Some local nonprofit organizations asked for collateral, which they didn't have.
Hoping to land a job in agriculture, Pradip Roy approached some farmers. But he was dismissed as a "Dhaka man," who wouldn't be able to cope in harsh weather conditions, recounted his wife.
Above all, "food was the biggest problem," said 20-year-old Dipali Roy, who was pregnant at the time and sometimes could only have one meal a day through a public rationing program. "I didn't know what to do ... We would just have to sit and wait when they would bring food."
2020 led to a historic setback in the fight against global poverty, with the number of the world's poorest rising for the first time in over 20 years, according to the World Bank.
Carolina Sánchez-Páramo, global director of poverty and equity at the World Bank, likened the pandemic to a natural disaster that would quickly spread beyond its epicenter in East Asia.
"We knew the tsunami was coming," she told CNN Business.
"The question was not if this [economic shock] was going to reach the other developing regions, but when."
Rising inequality
Even as tens of millions of people were being pushed into destitution, the ultra-rich became wealthier. Last year, billionaires enjoyed the highest boost to their share of wealth on record, according to the World Inequality Lab.
And while it took just nine months for the world's 1,000 richest people to reclaim their fortunes during the pandemic, it could be more than a decade before the least fortunate recover, according to Oxfam International's annual inequality report, released in January.
Shameran Abed, executive director of BRAC International, a nonprofit that works to alleviate poverty across Asia and Africa, pointed to the widening wealth gap, saying that "the world's three richest people" could likely wipe out ultra poverty on Earth.
"It's not their responsibility alone," he added. "But I'm just saying that generally there's enough resources [to tackle the problem]."
Recently, the top 1% has been under pressure to pitch in on humanitarian issues.
Video: Why Santas are in short supply this year (CNN Money)
In November, the director of the United Nations' World Food Programme called on billionaires including the world's two richest men, Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk, to "step up now, on a one-time basis."
In an interview with CNN's Becky Anderson, David Beasley said that giving $6 billion, or about 2% of Musk's net worth, could help solve world hunger.
"[It's] $6 billion to help 42 million people that are literally going to die if we don't reach them. It's not complicated," he added.
The call-out got a direct response from Musk, who later said on Twitter that if the organization could lay out "exactly how" the funding would solve the issue, he would "sell Tesla stock right now and do it."
The Tesla CEO did not publicly respond when the UN released a plan in November.
What's needed now
Abed, who recently worked with members of parliament in the United Kingdom to declare an "emergency" on the issue, argues that "poverty is a policy choice."
"We have the know-how to pull large amounts of people out of poverty," said the nonprofit leader, whose team helped the Roys with a loan that the couple said got them back on their feet.
"There's plenty of evidence of what works, what doesn't work."
Experts say the first task is to concentrate on vaccinations.
"We need to make sure that everybody has access to vaccines or some sort of treatment for the pandemic, because till you manage to control the health shock, it's very hard to think about economic recovery right?" said Sánchez-Páramo. "That's almost like a necessary condition for anything else to happen."
Vaccine inequality has become a major issue as many of the world's richest countries hoard shots, buying up enough doses to vaccinate their populations several times over and failing to deliver on their promises to share them with the developing world.
And as governments continue to rebuild, they should also focus on reactivating economic activity that would generate employment, such as in the service sector, according to Sánchez-Páramo.
Over the past two years, governments around the world have rolled out stimulus packages to help prop up their respective economies.
Sánchez-Páramo noted that while many have since come under "fiscal pressure" over how much they spent, it was important not to roll back safety net programs too quickly.
"They [should] wait for employment to recover before they withdraw income support from some of these more vulnerable households," she said.
"Because if we consolidate and roll back the support too quickly, we may actually see a second wave of increases in poverty because the employment is not yet there."
Glimmers of hope
Back in Bangladesh, the Roys are having better days.
After securing a loan of 40,000 taka ($466), the couple purchased a van and a goat to support themselves, they said.
Pradip Roy now works as driver with his van, ferrying passengers for the equivalent of about $6 a day. He said the family has no plans to return to the city, and is now saving up to buy a cow and some agricultural land.
While the two have technically climbed out of poverty, the hardships of the coronavirus crisis have made their mark.
Dipali Roy, who described the pangs of hunger while she was pregnant as "the most painful" time of her life, said "if I think back to, or remember those times, my heart bursts with tears."
"But now we are having very good days," she added, saying that she had regained hope for the future, and dreams that their six-month-old son will go on to get a master's degree.
Still, they have a reminder for the international community: do not forget those still left behind.
"There are a lot of people like us who fell to the bottom," said Pradip Roy. "So if you stand beside them they can also rise back up like us, slowly."
— Esha Mitra in New Delhi and Ivana Kottasová in London contributed to this report.
RSS
Atugasemd.
Varnaðarorð Dr. Robert´s Malone, sjálfs uppfinningamannsins að mRNA-tækninni sem gena-bóluefnin eru byggð á, eru hrollvekjandi. Eigi að síður eiga þau afar brýnt erindi við foreldra barna á þessum viðsjárverðu tímum. Hann kemur hér fram fyrir hönd hvorki meira né minna en 15 þúsund lækna og lýðheilsuvísindamanna um allan heim, sem undirritað hafa yfirlýsingu þess efnis að heilbrigð börn ættu alls ekki að vera bólusett gegn COVID. Enda hættan margfalt meiri á að þau veikist alvarlega af sprautunni heldur en af COVID þar sem hættan er hverfandi. Það er best fyrir þau og fjölskyldur þeirra að þau myndi náttúrulegt og þar með varanlegt ónæmi.
Þessi virti vísindamaður útskýrir með skýrum hætti hvernig þessi gena-bóluefni geta valdið óafturkræfum skaða á líffærum barnanna og hafa þegar gert.
Þessi áhrifamiklu varnaðarorð ættu að auðvelda foreldrum að taka upplýsta ákvörðun varðandi velferð barna sinna. Þessi varnaðarorð eiga tvímælalaust líka erindi við nýskipaðan heilbrigðísráðherra Willum Þór, sem margir binda miklar vonir við, ekki síst eftir að hann lýsti því yfir að endanleg ákvörðun (ráðerra) að bólusetja 5-11 ára börnin, yrði alltaf val, útfrá því að tryggja þeirra vernd (sjá vísi 9. des. s.l.).
Eftirfarandi linkur vísar á varnaðarorð Dr. Robert´s Malone bæði í mynd, máli og riti:
https://thecovidworld.com/before-your-child-is-injected-watch-dr-robert-malones-statement-on-child-covid-vaccinations/