860,000 Jews were dispeled from their homes and resettled, and 760,000 Arabs were dispeled, and placed in refugee camps paid by UN and the West, to be used to destroy the Jewish state. Thees camps have been used as a social organization.

Ekki borga til að halda vandræðunum áfram, heldur til að leysa málið strax.

Do not pay for status co, only pay for solutions,  

relief right now.

Palestine

Palestine under Brithish mandate

(Undir stjórn Bretlands.)

1923 – 1948

Jordan 89,342 sq km + Ísrael 20,770 sq km =

Palestine 110,112 sq km

(+Judea/Samaria 5860 sq km and Gasa 360 sq km, then 116,332 sq km)

klikka fyrir stærri mynd

1

000

Palestine,

Jordan,

Arabs, islam

(Undir stjórn Araba)

Arabs got ca. 77% of Palestine

89,342 sq km

klikka fyrir stærri mynd

2

000

Palestine

Israel

Jews, Christians, Arabs

(Undir stjórn Ísrael)

Ísrael got ca. 17.9 % (23 %) of Palestine

total: 20,770 sq km (sq km (+ Judea/Samaria 5860 sq km and Gasa 360 sq km then 26,990 sq km)The World Factbook

klikka fyrir stærri mynd

3

000

Egilsstaðir, 15.05.2018 Jónas Gunnlaugsson

000

4

Reynt að átta sig á skiptingu á því landi,

sem var kallað Palestína 1920 og var þá

116.332 ferkílómetrar

klikka fyrir stærri mynd

 

 

Velt vöngum um samþykkt Alþingis, um að búa til nýtt Palestínuríki, til viðbótar við Jórdaníu.

 -

Enginn segir neitt þótt búið sé að reka flesta Gyðinga frá þeim ríkjum sem Arabar ráða.

-

Verið er að hrekja Gyðinga frá Evrópu.

-

Ættum við að samþykkja stofnun á ríki fyrir Kúrda sem eru 10 til 20 miljónir,

(í dag eru þeir taldir, 35 miljónir, en þjóðirnar reyndu að falsa töluna)

og búa í Tyrklandi, Íran, Írak og Sýrlandi.

-

Hvernig væri að samþykkja frjálst Tíbet.

-

Það eru víst minnihlutar út um alla jörð, við verðum að vera samkvæmir í réttlætinu.

-

Við ætlum alls ekki að níðast á Gyðingum, eins og við höfum gert í árhundruð, og gerum enn.

-

Munum allar víturnar á Ísrael frá Mannréttindastofnun Sameinuðu þjóðanna.

-

Þá voru oft í forsvari hjá Mannréttindastofnuninni einræðisherrar,

sem þegnarnir eru að reyna að losna við í dag.

-

Það eru greinilega einhver sveitarfélög á Íslandi sem gætu verið sjálfstæð ríki,

aðeins þyrfti að flytja inn fleira fólk.

 -

Þá gæti eitthvert ríki, eða reyndar einhver þorp sem hefðu 300.000 íbúa,

samþykkt að til dæmis Fljótsdalshérað skildi vera sjálfstætt ríki.

 -

Sala á Grímsstöðum gæti verið fyrsta skrefið.

 

***

Flatarmál Ísraels án Júdeu og Samaríu, (vesturbakkans) er 20.770 ferkílómetrar.

 

Það er tvisvar (2,3) sinnum stærra en sveitarfélagið Fljótsdalshérað.

sem er 8.884 ferkílómetrar.

 

****

 

Flatarmál Ísraels með Júdeu og Samaríu, (vesturbakkans) er 26.630 ferkílómetrar.

 

Það er þrisvar (2,99) sinnum stærra en sveitarfélagið Fljótsdalshérað,

sem er 8.884 ferkílómetrar.

***

Ef við hugsum okkur Fljótsdalshérað allt,

sveitarfélögin Fljótsdalshreppur 1525 ferkílómetrar

 

og Fljótsdalshérað 8.884 ferkílómetrar,

þá er Fljótsdalshéraðið allt 10.409 ferkílómetrar.

-

Þarna er reynt að auðvelda okkur að skilja hvað Ísrael er lítið land,

hvort sem er með eða án Júdeu og Samaríu (vesturbakkans)

-

Það er ef til vill ekki rétt að gera grín að alvarlegu máli,

sem er þannig vaxið að við sjáum ekki lausn.

meira

Eg. 30.11.2011 jg

 

http://www.herad.is/y04/1/2011-11-09-The-Balfour-Declaration.htm

http://www.ismennt.is/not/jonasg/jg/jg06/abraham6.html

http://www.ismennt.is/not/jonasg/jg/jg06/israel6.html

http://www.ismennt.is/not/jonasg/jg/jg06/israel-27022009.html

http://www.herad.is/y04/1/2011-10-07-vesturbakkinn-judea-samaria.htm

 

000

Júðarnir í Ísrael

-

Gyðingarnir, Júðarnir fengu nafn af heimalandinu, Júdeu og Samaríu,

sem nú eru stundum kallaðar vesturbakkinn.

 -

Alþingi Íslendinga samþykkti að stofna þarna Palestínuríki númer 2,.

-

Ef af því verður eru aðeins um 10 mílur þvert í gegn um mitt Ísrael,

og af mörgum talið óverjandi í ófriði.

 -

Áður var búið að stofna Jórdaníu Múslimaríki á 76,8% af landi í Palestínu.

 -

Málin hafa þróast þannig að Júðarnir hafa verið að mestu reknir

frá þeim löndum sem Múslímar stjórna.

 -

Þá virðist mega búast við að fátt verði um Júða í Júdeu.

 -

Í dag eru Júðarnir, Gyðingarnir 17% af íbúum Júdeu og Samaríu.

-

Nú eru þeir kallaðir landtökumenn, settlers,

jafnvel þótt þorpum þeirra og ættingjum hafi verið eytt

þegar Jórdanir tóku Júdeu og Samaríu, "vesturbakkann" 1948.

-

Að sjálfsögðu lentu báðir aðilar í þessum hörmungum.

 -

Jórdanir réðu Júdeu og Samaríu, vesturbakkanum frá 1948 til 1967,

og afmáðu þá mikið af ummerkjum um Júðabyggðirnar.

 -

Þarna hafa Júðarnir og margar aðrar þjóðir hrakist fram og til baka,

í gegnum aldirnar.

-

Hvað er til ráða?

 -

Þessar þjóðir gætu saman verið í forustu í veröldinni.

 -

http://www.ismennt.is/not/jonasg/jg/jg06/israel6.html

http://www.herad.is/y04/1/2011-11-30-palestina-1920-2011.htm

(spurning um ártal á þessu hér)

Egilsstaðir, 08.02.2012 Jónas Gunnlaugsson

000

 

Egilsstaðir, 15.05.2018 Jónas Gunnlaugsson

 

 

 

Áróðursdeildir okkar efnistrúarfólksins kenna, að það sem er ósatt, sé satt, og við teljum það sannleika. Þannig getur og gerir púkinn í okkur haldið okkur sjálfum í fjósinu, og arðrænt fólkið. Hvernig væri að ganga út í ljósið og litina.

Þegar flestir fjölmiðlar, og flestir skólar, endurtaka alltaf sömu fullyrðingarnar, sannar eða ósannar, fara þá fullyrðingarnar upp í sameignlega vitið, og dreifast til allra manna, þegar fjöldinn sem meðtekur boðskapinn nær markhópnum, samanber 100 apa kenningin?*

Er þá hugsanlegt að þegar einhver hefur tök á fjölmiðlum veraldar, nægi þeim aðila að halda áfram og segja alltaf samhangandi falsfréttir?

Ef sami aðili getur haft áhrif á skólakennsluna, þá er hægt að kenna aðeins um þrívíðan, tíma heim, sem er sýndar heimur, en ekki alheimurinn, með sínum fjölvíða raunsannari veruleika heimi.

Ef einn hagsmunahópur, hefur alla hugmyndafræðsluna í sínum höndum, þá ræður hann hugmyndaheimi fólksins.

Þá sýnist að þær hugmyndir, þótt ósannar væru, myndu fara upp í eitthvað vitundasvæði, sem við myndum kalla alheims óvitið, það sem ekki er sannleikur.

Ekki er ólíklegt að við þurfum að læra að greina á milli þess sanna og þess ósanna.

Það sanna kemur frá sannleiksandanum í okkur, og það sem er ósatt, kemur þá frá því sem er ekki satt, í okkur.

Þarna er ég að bera saman kjarnann, the core, sem Nikola Tesla talar um, og þegar Jesú talar um heilagan Anda og Guð, við fjölmiðlaáróðurinn.

Fjölmiðla áróðurinn skapar ósanna heimsmynd, og reynir að koma í veg fyrir að við höfum skýra sýn til sannleikans.

Þess vegna sagði Jesú að, „ sannleikurinn mun gjöra yður frjálsa.“ — Jóhannes 8:32

000

 

Við færðum Kristnina, fjölvídda heiminn út úr skólunum.

Æskilegt er að þeir sem kenna í skólunum, hafi góða menntun, og kenni eftir allmennt viðurkenndum kennslu aðferðum.

000

slóðir

Allar smáeindirnar í efninu, eru aðeins orkusúpa, en um leið og við leikendurnir í holograminu horfum á súpuna, skynjum við eterinn, súpuna sem efni. Myndin sem við lifum í holograminu er aðeins til í hugskoti okkar.

25.2.2016 | 02:33

000

Stunda hugleiðslu og bæn þá getum við tengt okkur við alheimsvitið. Er Nikola Tesla að segja það?

5.2.2016 | 11:54

000

The secret order.

5.1.2013 | 12:16

000

*The Hundredth Monkey

www.worldtrans.org/pos/monkey.html

The Hundredth Monkey

by Ken Keyes, jr.

The Japanese monkey, Macaca fuscata, had been observed in the wild for a period of over 30 years.

In 1952, on the island of Koshima, scientists were providing monkeys with sweet potatoes dropped in the sand. The monkeys liked the taste of the raw sweet potatoes, but they found the dirt unpleasant.

An 18-month-old female named Imo found she could solve the problem by washing the potatoes in a nearby stream. She taught this trick to her mother. Her playmates also learned this new way and they taught their mothers too.

This cultural innovation was gradually picked up by various monkeys before the eyes of the scientists.

Between 1952 and 1958 all the young monkeys learned to wash the sandy sweet potatoes to make them more palatable.

Only the adults who imitated their children learned this social improvement. Other adults kept eating the dirty sweet potatoes.

Then something startling took place. In the autumn of 1958, a certain number of Koshima monkeys were washing sweet potatoes -- the exact number is not known.

Let us suppose that when the sun rose one morning there were 99 monkeys on Koshima Island who had learned to wash their sweet potatoes.

Let's further suppose that later that morning, the hundredth monkey learned to wash potatoes.

THEN IT HAPPENED!

By that evening almost everyone in the tribe was washing sweet potatoes before eating them.

The added energy of this hundredth monkey somehow created an ideological breakthrough!

But notice.

A most surprising thing observed by these scientists was that the habit of washing sweet potatoes then jumped over the sea --

Colonies of monkeys on other islands and the mainland troop of monkeys at Takasakiyama began washing their sweet potatoes.

Thus, when a certain critical number achieves an awareness, this new awareness may be communicated from mind to mind.

Although the exact number may vary, this Hundredth Monkey Phenomenon means that when only a limited number of people know of a new way, it may remain the conscious property of these people.

But there is a point at which if only one more person tunes-in to a new awareness, a field is strengthened so that this awareness is picked up by almost everyone!

(from the book "The Hundredth Monkey" by Ken Keyes, jr. The book is not copyrighted and the material may be reproduced in whole or in part. You can look at the whole book also.)

Egilsstaðir, 12.05.2018 Jónas Gunnlaugsson

“Mr. Barker, is your American system of banking, (1879) in your judgment, adapted to the needs of Russia?” Emperor Alexander II, [Americans] will do what is more vital in the shaping of the destinies of a nation. They will understand.

Barker’s greatest hope, as he says at the conclusion, is that his countrymen (the people in US, jg) will finally comprehend the motivation of their great friend in their hour of need.

He writes that “if they will give due thought to the words of the Emperor Alexander II, [Americans] will do what is more vital in the shaping of the destinies of a nation. They will understand.”

And today, before they can understand, they will have to remember. Therefore we take this opportunity to cast belated light on these great events.

— Webster Griffin Tarpley, Ph.D.

http://tarpley.net/2013/09/23/american-banker-wharton-barkers-first-person-account-confirms-russian-tsar-alexander-ii-was-ready-for-war-with-britain-and-france-in-1862-1863-to-defend-lincoln-and-the-union-americans-will-und/

The Secret of Russia’s Friendship

By Wharton Barker

[Mr. Barker was the Presidential nominee in 1900 of the Anti-Fusion Populists, and for many years baa been one of Pennsylvania’s most famous sons. In connection with the following article it is only necessary to recall that he was the American representative of Baring Brothers, the London bankers, and in 1878 the financial agent in the United States of the Russian Government and entrusted with the building of four cruisers for its navy; that he was made Knight of St. Stanislaus by Alexander II, and later was called to Russia to advise in regard to the development of the coal mines north of Azov.- —EDITOR. ]

THE oldest, the most changeless, the most apparent, and yet the least comprehended policy, is the policy of Russia. Russian friendship for the United States, a marvel of history, has remained—still remains—the mystery of diplomacy. Accepted because it is the conspicuous fact, its solution has been abandoned, while its endurance has been most amazingly presumed upon. How long the rough awakening would have been delayed, were it the policy of any Government other than immutable Russia, Manchuria and the “open door.” of China would long since have disclosed. But Russia’s statecraft is not of the months or of the years; it is of the ages. It is not of monarchs, but of a dynasty; and it is less the policy of the dynasty than it is the need of a people and of a land.

To only one American, I believe, has the secret of Russian friendship for this country ever been explained. The explanation was made by the Emperor, Alexander II, fully, carefully, and with so much explicitness that its purpose was not to be misunderstood. I have refrained from the performance of the duty, which was imposed upon me by the conferring of the Emperor’s confidence, for nearly twenty-five years, until now; the time had not come when the events which he divined might be considered imminent, and the hour for the disclosure had not unmistakably arrived. The time, I believe, is at hand; and I make public, in complete detail, all the pregnant considerations of policy which were entrusted to my discretion, together with such intimate details of His Majesty’s reflections upon the condition of his Empire and upon the future domestic condition of the United States as will evidence the profound, the unerring premises of foreknowledge whereon the policy of Russia toward the United States has been based. I do so with a full appreciation of the grave consequences which may and, indeed, should attend a disclosure of such immediate and far reaching importance.

On Sunday morning, August 17th, 1879, I was breakfast guest of the Grand Duke Constantine at his Pavlovski Palace. The talk, enduring for two hours at the table and in the library, covered many small subjects of public and private interest; but nothing of real and permanent value was said. Had I not enjoyed intimate and confidential relations with many persons high in official and social rank at St. Petersburg, the invitation of the Grand Duke would have made a deep impression upon me; but, as I had been his guest several times before, and had been, as well, the guest of many others at the Court of Alexander II, I thought the morning’s entertainment was no more significant than any other social compliment.

I was in Russia that year upon invitation of the Grand Duke Constantine and Prince Sergius Dolgorouki, for conference with them and with the Ministers of Finance, Ways of Communication and Public Domain, as to large and important railroads, coal, iron and steel enterprises about to be undertaken in the South of Russia. During the preceding year I was financial agent in America of the Russian Government, and, with Captain Semetschkin, directed the building of the cruisers “Europe,” “Asia,” “Africa” and “Zabiaca,” for Captains Grippenburg, Avalon, Alexieff and Loman, at Cramp’s shipyard. These captains, and many of the subordinate officers, were superior men. Semetschkin and Loman are dead; Grippenburg is now a retired Rear-Admiral; Avalon is now Vice-Admiral and Chief of Staff of the Russian Navy, and Alexieff is Viceroy of the Asiatic provinces of the Far East.

I was about to take my leave of the Grand Duke, when my host said:

“Wait a few minutes and you will see I called you here this morning for a purpose.”

Soon the lodge bell was rung; and the Grand Duke, summoning me to a window opening on the courtyard, said:

“You will now understand why you are here. The Emperor is coming; he wishes to talk with you in a somewhat informal way—a way in which he could not talk if you were presented to him at formal audience by the United States Minister. I will present you to His Majesty in about half an hour.”

The Grand Duke left me at the window and went to meet his brother at the door step. With no escort of servants, no body guard of armed men, the Emperor, mounted on a brown horse, came into the yard. He had not come alone from Tzarskoe, Selo. He was followed by a one-horse phaeton, in which were two ladies—the Empress of Russia and the Queen of Greece, daughters of the Grand Duke Constantine. There was no pomp, no display—nothing to mark the distinction of the little party of great people who had driven through the park that summer morning. It was really a unique and most interesting beginning to an important interview.

A brief description of the room in which this portentous talk with the Emperor, Alexander II, took place, will increase the interest of the interview, for it marks the Oriental mind, to be found only in Russia and in China. The Oriental loves the beautiful, more, I believe, than does the Italian. He waits with patience the opportunity that brings about the accomplishment of his plans and hopes; and he knows, better than the men of the Western world, how to absorb and use individual men as well as nations.

The audience room in the Pavlovski Palace was in dimensions about sixty by forty feet; the ceiling was fully twenty feet high; large windows on each side overlooked the terrace and afforded a view of the park. The other side and both ends, decorated with large mirrors, were finished in white paint and gold. The furniture was gold, with rich tapestry covering. The floor was rather cold, for there were no rugs. Such were the normal conditions the architect and the artist had produced; but, for the interview, the Grand Duke added a beautiful bank of rose bushes, in full bloom—tea roses all. About one-quarter of the space was filled with roses in pots from the greenhouses, the blooms forming a crescent in one corner of the room.

In front of the bank of roses the Emperor received me, on his right hand the Grand Duke Constantine, on his left hand the Empress and the Grand Duchess. To one side and, of course, apart from the Imperial group, stood my friend Semetschkin.

On entering, I was presented, without any formality or delay, to the Emperor by the Grand Duke, as “Mr. Barker, your Majesty’s American banker.”

The Emperor’s first remark was incisively inquiring:

“Mr. Barker, is your American system of banking, in your judgment, adapted to the needs of Russia?”

There was then, for a few minutes, a general talk on economic and financial questions that satisfied me the Emperor had been a student of those questions, as, later, I was sure he had given much attention to the great questions that pressed upon his own country and upon other countries as well. He spoke at some length of the plans of his Minister of Finance—comprehensive plans, plans which later, in 1890, played a very important part in European affairs. He spoke of the liberation of his serfs; of his efforts to educate them: of how and why those efforts had largely failed. He referred with earnestness to the conditions he met in the course of discussions with the land owners; of how he went through the provinces, appealing to the conciliatory spirit and the devotion of his nobility, reprimanding those who hung back, reminding them that reforms come better from above than from below. He even disclosed frankly the manner in which he had packed the Imperial Commission with men devoted to the principles of emancipation. The Commission declared for the immediate abolition of serfdom and urged the most effectual measures to prevent the re-establishment of the seignorial authority under other forms; and it decided, also, that the peasant should become a proprietor on the payment of an indemnity. It is important to remember that the manifesto of March 3d, 1861, declared these fundamental principles. The peasants were to be invested with all the rights of free cultivators of the soil. In consideration of certain quit-rents, they were to obtain full enjoyment of their enclosures and also a quantity of arable land. More than nine acres of land were given to every male peasant. The Government made loans, so that the peasants could immediately liberate themselves from their lords, yet remain debtors to the state. More than one half the land was thus taken from the lord and given to the peasant. It should not be forgotten that the Russian peasants owe their liberty to the firm will of the Emperor, and to the generous efforts of his brother, the Grand Duke Constantine.

“I did more for the Russian serf,” observed the Emperor, “in giving him land as well as personal liberty, than America did for the Negro slave set free by the proclamation of President Lincoln.’ I am at a loss to understand how you Americans could have been so blind as to leave the Negro slave without tools to work out his salvation. In giving him personal liberty, you gave him an obligation to perform to the state which he must be unable to fulfill. Without property of any kind he cannot educate himself and his children. I believe the time must come when many will question the manner of American emancipation of the Negro slaves in 1863. The vote, in the hands of an ignorant man, without either property or self respect, will be used to the damage of the people at large; for the rich man, without honor or any kind of patriotism, will purchase it, and with it swamp the rights of a free people.”

All this makes clear the keen appreciation the Emperor Alexander had of what he had done for his serfs—and of what Americans had done for the Negro slaves. The hopes and dreams of the Emperor Alexander, and of the great men who helped him free the Russian serfs, and the hopes and expectations of Lincoln, Garrison and the thousands of Americans who gave their lives and fortunes to the cause of negro emancipation, have not been realized. But the fears of Alexander have been realized. The Emperor was right in thinking the solution of the Negro slave question would debauch our people and bring serious trouble to America. But, as I reflect upon what he said regarding the clash of classes in Russia and in other European countries, and upon the same conflict in America between the ” House of Have ” and the ” House of Have Not,” I am led to wonder at the grasp of the great man I talked with so long ago at St. Petersburg. Even more prescient was his forecast of the American industrial conditions of to-day.

“Your great industrial development,” he continued, “has built up very large fortunes in few hands; and the conditions such fortunes produce must bring on a class conflict that cannot fail to make a test of the stability of your institutions. The men who have those fortunes know only the law of greed; they have no respect for the rights of others; and they will surely make an effort to use the strong arm of government to enslave the people. They will use the public franchises you grant in so liberal, so dangerous a way, to tax the people. These men of large fortunes will organize into groups to increase their power, and their aggressions will as surely drive the body of your people to the enactment of laws which may be most hurtful to the general prosperity. I see a great conflict must soon come in America between the few who have vast fortunes and the many reduced to a kind of industrial slavery.”

If conditions in America in 1879 brought such reflections to a Russian Emperor, what must be the reflections of Europeans of to-day, who are as serious, as earnest and as capable as Alexander II? If the Emperor had dismissed me after these remarks, I could never forget the 1879 August Sunday at Pavlovski; but I was to hear a chapter of world history that should be put in permanent form by me; for I do not believe the chapter was ever spoken or written for another by Alexander. Without knowledge of this chapter, many very great events cannot be understood. Of those present at this remarkable interview, only the Emperor and I spoke. Of course, and I believe, fortunately, my part in the conversation was small. The circumstances under which the interview proceeded moved Alexander to speak in earnest, aggressive, but sad tones. It was apparent to me that he had lived for a long time in intellectual loneliness; that he scarcely knew what fair and open criticism of his acts was; that he believed those about him and near to him did not, and probably could not, appreciate the major purposes and acts of his life— that he believed he must always act for himself and for Russia; that the responsibility of the Russian Empire rested upon him alone, and not upon him and his Ministers and Council of State.

“In the autumn of 1862,” observed the Emperor, “the Governments of France and Great Britain proposed to Russia, in a formal, but not in an official way, the joint recognition by European Powers of the independence of the Confederate States of America. My immediate answer was: ‘I will not co-operate in such action; and I will not acquiesce. On the contrary, I shall accept the recognition of the independence of the Confederate States by France and Great Britain as a casus belli for Russia. And, in order that the Governments of France and Great Britain may understand that this is no idle threat, I will send a Pacific fleet to San Francisco and an Atlantic fleet to New York.’ Sealed orders to both Admirals were given.”

After a pause, he proceeded: “My fleets arrived at the American ports; there was no recognition of the independence of the Confederate States by Great Britain and France. The American rebellion was put down, and the great American Republic continues.

“All this I did because of love for my own dear Russia, rather than for love of the American Republic. I acted thus because I understood that Russia would have a more serious task to perform if the American Republic, with advanced industrial development, were broken up and Great Britain should be left in control of most branches of modern industrial development.

“In 1864 I was silent as to what the course of Russia would be, should Great Britain and France support Denmark in the war waged upon her by Prussia and Austria over the Schleswig-Holstein question. The result was that France did nothing; and Great Britain, although anxious to preserve the territorial integrity of Denmark, confined her efforts, as in the case of Poland shortly before, to the limit of mere diplomatic intervention. The plans of Bismarck were advanced— Schleswig-Holstein became a German province.

“In 1866, when Bismarck sought, together with Prussia, Hanover, Hessen-Cassel, Nassau and Frankfurt, to establish the North German Confederation and to exclude Austria from the German Confederation, I was silent as to what the action of Russia would be should France support Austria in the pending war. Because of this silence, France hesitated to act until it was too late, and the dreams and ambitions of Bismarck were realized. My purpose was the establishment of a European balance of power that would be a menace to Great Britain.”

The Emperor again paused for a moment, to see, I think, what effect he was making upon me. I remained silent and expectant. He spoke once more, and said: “To complete German unity, and to enable German manufacturers to strike at British industrial and commercial supremacy, it was plain the plan of Bismarck, for despoiling France of Alsace and Lorraine, must not be hindered. Therefore when, in 1870, the French-German war opened, I let it be understood that assistance to France from Austria or Great Britain would be followed by Russian support of Germany. Therefore, the war was fought out between France and Germany; and the German Empire was established and proclaimed. My support of Germany in these three wars was because my Russia would profit.

“When the French people had paid the indemnity to Germany, and the Republic of France grew strong, there was alarm at Berlin; and Bismarck would have sought quarrel with France but for my attitude. The French-Russian understanding has preserved peace in Europe. The course of Russia is clear and her destiny can be fulfilled. Russia stands for peace.”

In conclusion, the Emperor said:

“I have believed these acts were great acts, because they were right. But they are not appreciated as righteous acts by those near me; and those far off and outside of Russia look upon me as selfish.”

The Emperor and the Imperial party left the room; the audience was over. I went back to St. Petersburg almost immediately after their departure.

The following day, August i8th, 1879, I was guest of honor on a steam yacht, one of three in line near the Nicholas Bridge. The Emperor and his staff were on the largest one; the Grand Duke Constantine and the Naval Staff on the second; and Captain and Madame Semetschkin and I on the third. In tow of the Imperial yacht was a small boat, the men holding oars at rest, ready to cut the tow line, drop oars into the water, and pull wherever directed, should any accident befall the Imperial yacht. The gunwales of the boat were covered with purple and gold cloth, to add to the magnificence of the pageant. The day was cloudy; there was no movement of pleasure boats on the Neva; there was no incident of special interest until we came to Kronstadt, seventeen miles distant from St. Petersburg.

The harbor of Kronstadt was an impressive picture. The Russian Baltic Squadron was drawn up in double line. The place of honor between those lines was occupied by the small United States cruiser ” Enterprise.” Immediately upon the arrival of the yacht fleet, the Emperor opened the review. As he went from one ship to another, the crews manned the yards, the bands played, and guns were fired, in his honor. But the day was still cloudy.

When the Emperor had gone on board all his own ships, the climax came. He went to the tiny “Enterprise.” As he was received on the quarter deck, at a signal gun from the Imperial yacht the American flag was run to the masthead of all the Russian war ships at Kronstadt, and a gun salute was fired from all the ships together, in honor of our country and our flag. As the smoke rolled away the clouds broke, and the bright sun shone upon the American flag with a new and splendid glory.

Russia had not forgotten properly to honor the flag Russian fleets had upheld at New York and San Francisco in 1863; and those American citizens who were at Kronstadt on that day appreciated what Russian friendship for America had been, and then was.

Americans cannot forget either the Russell-Palmerston-Louis Napoleon proposal, or the Alexander answer of 1862-1863. They remember that they owe almost as much to Russian action in 1863 as they do to French action in 1778. But if they will give due thought to the words of the Emperor Alexander II, they will do what is more vital in the shaping of the destinies of a nation. They will understand.

 Egilsstaðir, 12.05.2018  Jónas Gunnlaugsson

 

SYKURSÝKI - “We have to amputate your legs. Today. Íslensk einföld endursögn á grunni greinarinnar. Þegar sá sem hefur sykursíki 2, fer í magastyttingu, þá hverfur sykur síking 2, næstum samdægurs.

7.6.2017 | 23:12

SYKURSÝKI - “We have to amputate your legs. Today. Íslensk einföld endursögn á grunni greinarinnar.

Hér er umræðan, og sölumennska.

Við hugsum, hvað er rétt, og hvað er rangt.

Þetta er aðeins einfölduð íslensk endursögn.

Fá sérfræðinga til að skoða málin.

***

Þegar sá sem hefur sykursíki 2, fer í magastyttingu, þá hverfur sykur síking 2, næstum samdægurs.

Þetta hefur skeð um veröld alla í áratugi.

Maga aðgerðin hefur ekkert að gera með sykur síkina.

Flestir sykur síkis 2 sjúklingarnir þurfa þá minna af lyfjum, eða engin.

Í ára raðir hefur engin getað gefið skýringu á þessu.

Eitthvað, breytti insúlín stöðinni hjá sjúklingum með sykursíki 2.

Taylor einsetti sér að finna út, hver ástæðan væri.

Það var vitað að sjúklingar með sykur síki 2 höfðu fitu (deposits)

lag umhverfis briskirtilinn, og héldu menn, að fitulagið

kæmi vegna sykursíkinnar.

Taylor áttaði sig á að fitulagið umhverfis brisið er aðal orsökin fyrir sjúkdómnum, sykursíki 2.

Brisið býr til insúlínið og heldur glúkósa magninu réttu.

Fitan þrýstir á og leitar inn í brisið, og gerir það að einhverju leiti óstarfshæft, og þá framleiðir það ekki nóg insúlín.

Loksins, árið 2012 fann Taylor lausnina.

Allir sem fara í magastyttingu, eru settir í sérstakt mataræði.

Þetta mataræði eyðir fitunni í og við brisið, og þá fór brisið að vinna rétt.

Taylor útbjó sérstakt mataræði og þá fór fitan við og í brisinu, og sykursíkin 2.

Hér er sagt að, every single person was able to stop taking their medication, allir gátu hætt að taka lyfin sín.

Because that’s what diabetes medication and insulin shots are: “bandaid fixes” that only treat the symptoms...

Gömlu sykursíkis lyfin og insúlínið, virkuðu aðeins á sjúkdómseinkennin.

***

Þetta er aðeins einfölduð íslensk endursögn.

Fá sérfræðinga til að skoða málin.

000

“We have to amputate your legs. Today.”

Best er  að skoða slóðina hér neðan við

http://diabetesdestroyer.com/sp-lfslv1/?aff_id=232610&subid=2337955443&subid2=394&l=n&key=

klikka á mynd, þá verður hún stærri

000

 

00

Þetta er aðeins einfölduð endursögn.

Fá sérfræðinga til að skoða málin.

***

Þegar sá sem hefur sykursíki 2, fer í magastyttingu, þá hverfur sykur síking 2, næstum samdægurs.

Þetta hefur skeð um veröld alla í áratugi.

Maga aðgerðin hefur ekkert að gera með sykur síkina.

Flestir sykur síkis 2 sjúklingarnir þurfa þá minna af lyfjum, eða engin.

Í ára raðir hefur engin getað gefið skýringu á þessu.

Eitthvað, breytti insúlín stöðinni hjá sjúklingum með sykursíki 2.

Taylor einsetti sér að finna út, hver ástæðan væri.

Það var vitað að sjúklingar með sykur síki 2 höfðu fitu (deposits) lag umhverfis briskirtilinn,

og héldu menn, að fitulagið kæmi vegna sykursíkinnar.

Taylor áttaði sig á að fitulagið umhverfis brisið er aðal orsökin fyrir sjúkdómnum, sykursíki 2.

Brisið býr til insúlínið og heldur glúkósa magninu réttu.

Fitan þrýstir á og leitar inn í brisið, og gerir það að einhverju leiti óstarfshæft, og þá framleiðir það ekki nóg insúlín.

Loksins, árið 2012 fann Taylor lausnina.

Allir sem fara í magastyttingu, eru settir í sérstakt mataræði.

Þetta mataræði eyðir fitunni í og við brisið, og þá fór brisið að vinna rétt.

Taylor útbjó sérstakt mataræði og þá fór fitan við og í brisinu, og sykursíkin 2.

Hér er sagt að, every single person was able to stop taking their medication, allir gátu hætt að taka lyfin sín.

Because that’s what diabetes medication and insulin shots are: “bandaid fixes” that only treat the symptoms...

Gömlu sykursíkis lyfin og insúlínið, virkuðu aðeins á sjúkdómseinkennin.

***

Þetta er aðeins einfölduð endursögn.

Fá sérfræðinga til að skoða málin.

1

 

0

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

 

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

http://diabetesdestroyer.com/sp-lfslv1/?aff_id=232610&subid=2337955443&subid2=394&l=n&key=

“We have to amputate your legs. Today.”

Egilsstaðir, 07.06.2017   Jónas Gunnlaugsson

Þegar ég tala um trú, sið, hjá Jesú, þá er ég að tala um hugmyndir sjáendanna, sem Jesú hafði lært um í ritunum, og hjá prestunum. Stjórnsýslan hefur á flestum tímum verið hrædd við sjáendur, og reynt að berja hugmyndir þeirra niður.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dimension_(mathematics_and_physics)

 

Sett á blogg:  Jónas Gunnlaugsson

https://jonasg-eg.blog.is/blog/jonasg-eg/entry/2215499/

Já, ég vil segja þetta rétt hjá þér Bjarne Örn Hansen, að þjóðin er siðurinn, trúin.

Þá getum við sagt að fjölmenning sé engin þjóð.

Þegar ég tala um trú, sið, hjá Jesú, þá er ég að tala um hugmyndir sjáendanna, sem Jesú hafði lært um í ritunum, og hjá prestunum.

Einnig voru einhverjir sjáendur, á æviskeiði Jesú, það er þeir sem höfðu smá innsýn í fleiri en þrjár víddir og tíma.

Þær reglur sem þeir settu sem höfðu litla sýn til fleiri vídda, köllum við þá stjórnsýslu reglur, til aðgreiningar frá því sem kom frá sjáendunum.

Stjórnsýslan hefur á flestum tímum verið hrædd við sjáendur, og reynt að berja hugmyndir þeirra niður.

Páll var að berja niður hugmyndir sjáendanna, þegar honum snerist hugur og þá fór hann að vinna að málefnunum með innsýn til fleiri heima, eða vídda.

Heimsk stjórnsýsla, hefur alltaf verið til, þegar við þessir sem eru fastir í þrívíddinni og tímanum, höfum stýrt málefnunum.

Einn siður, ein lög, en þau lög verða að vera „góð,“ og vel hugsuð.

Gangi þér allt í haginn.

000 

slóð

Two teams ... US / Europe ... have shown the existence of a fourth spatial dimension ...we can, theoretically at least, turn a two-dimensional system into a four-dimensional one.

Jónas Gunnlaugsson | 7. janúar 2018

Put simply, as we perceive it, 3D objects cast 2D shadows, so it follows that 4D objects would cast 3D shadows, even if we can't actually see the 4D object itself. The 4th dimension, but not as we know it: Scientists bend rules to catch glimpse of

slóð

1. Dimension - Wikipedia

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dimension_(mathematics_and_physics)

Ten dimensions are used to describe string theory, eleven dimensions can describe supergravity and M-theory, ... of the kind that string theory is intended to provide.

 slóð

The 12 Dimensions of Creation - bibliotecapleyades.net

http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/ciencia/ciencia_dimensiones01.htm

The Twelve Dimensions of Creation ... When I finally discovered the twelve dimensions of Creation, ... The next 3 dimensions are Energy Dimension 9 is etheric, ...

slóð

Nikola Tesla var einn af þeim, sem fluttu þjóðunum blessun og leystu fólkið úr ánauð þekkingarleysisins? Þekkingin skapar allsnæktir. Nústaðreyndatrúin stóð á móti Jesú og Nikola Tesla. Við skulum færa Jesú og Tesla aftur inn í skólanna.

20.12.2017 | 18:24

Egilsstaðir, 05.05.2018 Jónas Gunnlaugsson

 

Það vantaði ekki samstöðuna hjá flokkunum, þegar þeir ráku Vísindin, Kristnina, Fjölvíða heiminn út úr skólunum. Þarna kenndum við sýndarveröldina, eins og hún væri alheimurinn.

Að hluta sett á blogg: Sveinn R. Pálsson

https://svennip.blog.is/blog/svennip/entry/2215426/

Það vantaði ekki samstöðuna hjá flokkunum, þegar þeir ráku Vísindin, Kristnina, Fjölvíða heiminn út úr skólunum.

Þá skildi aðeins kenna þrívíðan tíma heim, sem er blekking.

Þarna kenndum við sýndarveröldina, eins og hún væri alheimurinn.

Þetta vissu Indverjar fyrir þúsundum ára, Jesú vissi þetta, og Nú á okkar tímum, kenndi Nikola Tesla þetta sama.

Það er full samstaða um sexið og sykurinn, og um að trúa á þrívíðan tíma heim, sem við vitum að er sýndarveröld.

Nú breytum við frá þessum misskilningi, og færum Kristnina sem Jesú boðaði og Nikola Tesla rökstuddi aftur inn í skólana.

Þroskum sjáandann í okkur til að við skilju meira í raunheimum.

Þingmenn á Alþingi, eiga ekki að leika skrifstofu menn hjá stjórnsýslunni.

Heilir og sælir, bið ykkur vel að lifa.

slóð

Kennedy byrjaði að færa peningaprentunina, til ríkisins, og galt fyrir það með lífi sínu. Trump, stefnir að því að færa peningaprentunina, aftur til ríkisins. Sigmundur Davíð Gunnlaugsson, stefndi að því að færa peningaprentunina, aftur til ríkisins.

20.12.2016 | 14:58

Svo kom Regan, og þá kom já ráðherra með hjólbörurnar fullar af skjölum.

Regan, horfði á skjalabunkann hugsi, hann hafði aldrei verið mikill skrifstofumaður.

 Þegar Regan fór í framboð til forseta, var mikið talað um að hann væri bara leikari, og ekki mjög slyngur í skjölunum.

Regan bað já ráðherra að fjarlægja börurnar og skjölin, hann kynni ekkert að fara með skjöl.

Regan taldi að starfsfólkið í ráðuneytinu væri mun betur til þess fallið að pappírast.

Regan þakkaði já ráðherra vel fyrir, þegar börurnar voru farnar.

Regan varð virtur forseti.

Egilsstaðir, 26.04.2018 Jónas Gunnlaugsson

Þessi deila Palestínumanna og Ísraela er hörmung. Við biðjum fyrir þeim öllum. Saman gætum við allir fært þjóðirnar inn í fyrirheitna landið.

 

Þessi deila Palestínumanna og Ísraela er hörmung.

Við biðjum fyrir þeim öllum.

Þegar 5 Arabaríki réðust inn í Ísrael 1948 þá hröktust Gyðingar frá Arabaríkjunum og til Ísrael, og Arabar flýðu til Arabaríkjanna. 

Sagt var að 860.000 Gyðingar hafi flúið frá Arabaríkjunum og þeim var komið fyrir í Ísrael og öðrum löndum.

Sagt var að 540.000 til 720.000 Palestínumenn hafi flúið frá Ísrael til Arabaríkjanna, Vestur bakkans, þá Jórdanía, til Gaza, þá í Egiptalandi, og fleiri ríkja og var þeim komið fyrir í flóttamannabúðum.

Þarna kom strax sá afgerandi munur að Ísrael kom flóttamönnunum fyrir í Ísrael, en Arabalöndin héldu Flóttamönnunum frá Palestínu í flóttamanna búðunum.

 

Stofnuð var sérstök deild hjá Sameinuðu þjóðunum, UNRWA, til að halda vandamálinu við, en ekki til að leysa það.

000

 Slóð

Israel, 29.01.2009. endurtekið

 

31.7.2014 | 23:24

Heldur þú virkilega að þetta séu allt flóttamenn, þessar búðir hafa verið notaðar sem félagsmálastofnun fyrir þjóðirnar í kring og Vesturlönd og Sameinuðu þjóðirnar hafa borgað brúsann.

Einhversstaðar hafði ég lesið að Arafat væri fæddur í Egyptalandi. 

000

slóð

Ísrael 27.01.2009,

16.3.2012 | 18:24 

Velt vöngum um,

hvar okkur hefur mistekist

Egilsstaðir, 25.04.2018  Jónas Gunnlaugsson

 

 

 

Dæmdur fyrir að skjóta piltinn til bana

Við þurfum að færa okkur út úr lífkeðjunni og rækta í okkur matinn fremst í keðjunni, heildarorð, grasið og þörungana. Nú er byrjað að framleiða allskonar dýraafurðir, beint úr frumunum, sem lifa þá í fæðu umhverfi, og verða afurðirnar þá ódýrari.

Sett á blog: Jón Valur Jensson

https://jvj.blog.is/blog/jvj/entry/2215317/

Við eigum að stjórna okkur sjálfir, eins og JVJ, segir.

Þakka ykkur öllum fyrir kennsluna. Það er gaman að það verður minni nauðsyn á að lifa á veiðum, eða dýra afurðum.

Það er mjög dýrt að framleiða fyrst 20 til 30 manna korn mat og gefa svo dýrunum kornið og fá mat fyrir 1 mann.

Við þurfum að færa okkur út úr lífkeðjunni og rækta í okkur matinn fremst í keðjunni, heildarorð, grasið og þörungana.

Nú er byrjað að framleiða allskonar dýraafurðir, beint úr frumunum, sem lifa þá í fæðu umhverfi, og verða afurðirnar þá trúlega mun ódýrari.

Framleiðendur segja, þetta er ekta lifandi vefur, kjöt, fiskur.

Við nögum hræið, náinn, þetta er gamli tíminn.

Hvort þetta sé náttúruvænna en verksmiðju dýra búskapur, veit ég ekki.

en þrælahald á dýrum, meðbræðrum, er ekki framtíðin.

Við sjálfir hættum að vera húsdýr í fjósinu hjá púkanum í okkur.

Við hlíðum púkanum best, þegar við höfum einhver vandræði falin, þá getur púkinn hótað að birta í fjölmiðlunum sínum, mistökin okkar.

Falin mistök, þá góður í að halda okkur fólkinu ómenntuðu og þjónandi úrelta kerfinu.

Við breytum þessu öllu, fáum skynjun í fleiri víddum, og leitum í ljósið og litina.

Lifið heilir.

Egilsstaðir, 24.04.2018 Jónas Gunnlaugsson

Muslims Rape, Steal, and Murder for 1350 years. Why are we afraid to discuss Islam? - Vaknaðu Amerika, áður en þú veist af verður það of seinnt. Vaknaðu vegan barnana þinna. Láttu ekki þrælka þig.

Muslims Rape, Steal, and Murder for 1350 years. Why are we afraid to discuss Islam?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yi-A1bb-omg

Vaknaðu Amerika, áður en þú veist af verður það of seinnt.

Vaknaðu vegan barnana þinna. Láttu ekki þrælka þig.

Wake up America. Soon, you will not be allowed to awaken.

Do it for your children.

Þú sem hefur getuna til að lesa og hlusta á þá sem eru að kenna okkur, átt að dreifa því til okkar hinna.

Published on Jan 22, 2017

Excerpts Taken from "Why We Are Afraid, A 1400 Year Secret, by Dr. Bill Warner." Credit to Dr. Bill Warner. He's not a historian, he's a truth teller. There is a dangerous Muslim problem in the United States and Europe. Sadly, many people are unaware. Adults know what is on TV,

they know what sports are on, but they are oblivious to the Muslim invasion! Soon, they will have no choice but to face it. SHARE these videos.  Please subscribe, I will have a Strong channel with diverse and meaningful content for people to learn. I do not ask for money, and I have nothing to sell you.

I want to share the truth with my fellow men and women who have the Courage to hear it. 

 

klikka til að fá stærri mynd

We have never got anything from Islam but war and hell.

 

Horfðu á vídeóið, lærðu um sögu vesturlanda, heimssöguna, þá skilur þú baráttuna í dag.

Kristnin er undir staða vestrænnar menningar. Meira

Skoða betur

Egilsstaðir, 19.04.2017 Jónas Gunnlaugsson

 

BBC interviews British Admiral Lord West who says it's clear Assad didn't use chemical weapons because that would be an idiot move for him & no proof. BBC host then tells West to stop exposing the lies because it will help Russian disinformation!

 I would say look we gotta wait until there is another attack by Assad s forces I have was particularly they have a helicopter overhead or something like that and they are dropping barrel bombs and we must set off some chlorine because we will get the next attack from the Allies * look at the bottom, athuga neðst

BBC presenter declares ‘info war against Russia’ after ex-navy chief questions Syria ‘evidence’

Published time: 18 Apr, 2018 15:15 Edited time: 19 Apr, 2018 09:37

https://www.rt.com/uk/424508-bbc-information-war-west-syria/

Get short URL

Britain's Admiral Lord West. © Neil Hall / Reuters

During a live interview, a BBC news presenter declared “we’re in an information war with Russia” after a former Royal Navy chief questioned the “extraordinary” claims surrounding an alleged chemical attack in Syria.

Former Navy Admiral Lord West’s questioning of the mainstream narrative surrounding the alleged chemical weapons attack in the town of Douma led the BBC’s Annita McVeigh to suggest that truthfully stating his position and posing questions risked “muddying the waters” in an ongoing “information war with Russia.”

https://youtu.be/foj29LIXpy4

HAAAAA!! BBC interviews British Admiral Lord West who says it's clear Assad didn't use chemical weapons because that would be an idiot move for him & no proof.

BBC host then tells West to stop exposing the lies because it will help Russian disinformation!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=foj29LIXpy4 …

Lord West had described how in his view the claim that Bashar Assad ordered the attack “doesn’t ring true,” asking “what benefit is there for his military?”

He went on to say “we know that in the past some of the Islamic groups have used chemicals, and of course there would be huge benefit in them labelling an attack as coming from Assad.”

Read more

How to become 'an Assad apologist'? Just question MSM rhetoric & welcome to the club

West went on to question the ‘evidence’ provided by groups like the White Helmets and the World Health Organization, both of which he described as “not neutral.”

The former First Sea Lord then described how in the past he had been put under pressure to support politically motivated narratives: “I had huge pressure put on me politically to try and say that our bombing campaign in Bosnia was achieving all sorts of things which it wasn’t. I was put under huge pressure, so I know the things that can happen.”

At that point the BBC’s McVeigh appeared to question whether he should actually be expressing his opinion truthfully, asking: “Given that we’re in an information war with Russia on so many fronts, do you think perhaps it’s inadvisable to be stating this so publicly given your position and profile, isn’t there a danger that you’re muddying the waters?”

West replied: “I think the answer is, if there’s a real concern, let’s face it, if [Assad] hasn’t done it then that is extremely bad news. If Assad hasn’t carried out the attack, I think it’s just worth making that clear. I think our government’s policy towards Assad has not been clever since 2013.”

In a response to RT, the corporation said: "It is the job of BBC presenters and reporters to ensure all angles within a debate are explored and challenged. That is exactly what happened in this interview."

Think your friends would be interested? Share this story!

000

Skjátextinn er hugsanlega gerður af vél

Las teksta á skjánum, frá mínútu   0,36 to 3:54            

Read text on screen from min,      0,36 to 3:54

´Skrifaði afrit, tvítók orð og villur, kann ekki eignarfalls kommu.

(min 0,36) president assad is in the process of winning this civil war and he was about to take over and occupy do him all that area he d had a long long hard slog slowly capturing that whole area of the city and there just before he goes in and takes it all over apparently he decides to have a chemical attack it just does not ring true it seems extraordinary because clearly he would know that there is likely be a response from the allies what what benefit is there for his military most of the rebel fighters this disparate group of Islamists withdrawn there are a few women and children left around what what benefit was there militarily in doing what he did I find that extraordinary (min 1:22) -whereas we know that in past the past some of the Islamic groups have used chemicals and of course there would be huge benefit in them labeling an attack as coming from Assad because they would guess quite rightly that there would be a response from the US as was last time and possibly from the UK and France is it fair to say though that you are looking at this from the point of from the point of view of strategy and tactics rather than any evidence absolutely although we do know that the reports that have came from there were from the white helmets who let us face it or not not neutrals you know they are very much on the side of the disparate groups are fighting Assad and also the World Health Organization doctors who are there and again those doctors are embedded in amongst the groups doing fantastic work I know but they are not they are not neutral and and I am just a little bit concerned because as we now move to the next phase in this war or if I were advising some of the Islamist groups many of whom are worse than – *I would say look we gotta wait until there is another attack by Assad s forces I have was particularly they have a helicopter overhead or something like that and they are dropping barrel bombs and we must set off some chlorine because we will get the next attack from the Allies and there is no doubt that if we believe he has done a chemical attack we should do that and those attacks will get bigger and it is the only way they have got actually of stopping the inevitable victory of Assad are you saying that there may by something faulty with the intelligence the proof that President mackerel has said he has with thee to quote the defense secretary here Gavin Williamson the significant body of intelligence which suggests the Assad regime is responsible for what happened in Douma are you suggesting there may be faulty intelligence behind all of this I think of it saying it suggests it did it I am not sure that is strong enough if they have got and I am not privy to this if they got really good intelligence let us say for example GCHQ or NSA intercepts og Syrian officers discussing an attack and saying yes let us use chlorine then okay fine and I have no difficulty with what was done none at all I think if if he has used chemical weapons it is absolutely right to do a rap across his knuckles to show him that the international community are not willing to put up with this and it is right to do (3:41mínúta) it but I just wonder you know we have had some bad experiences on intelligence when I was chief of Defense Intelligence I had a huge pressure put me politically to try and say that –stop (mínúta 3:54)

Egilsstaðir, 20.04.2018 Jónas Gunnlaugsson